Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Assistive Technology and Older Adults in Disasters: Implications for Emergency Management

  • Mary Helen McSweeney-Feld (a1)
Abstract

This article identifies concepts, trends, and policy gaps in the availability and service delivery of assistive technology utilized by older adults in disasters, as well as implications for emergency management planning and shelter administration. Definitions of types of assistive technology, as well as views of older adults using technology as at-risk individuals for emergency management service provision, are provided. An overview of peer-reviewed articles and gray literature is conducted, focusing on publications from 2001 to the present in the United States. Analytical frameworks used by emergency management organizations as well as regulations such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and recent court decisions on emergency shelter accessibility in disasters are reviewed. Research on the use of assistive technology by older adults during disasters is a neglected issue. The current and potential benefits of defining standards for provision and use of assistive technology for older adults during disasters has received limited recognition in emergency management planning. Older adults with disabilities utilize assistive technology to maintain their independence and dignity, and communities as well as emergency services managers need to become more aware of the needs and preferences of these older adults in their planning processes and drills as well as in service delivery during actual events. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:135–139)

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Assistive Technology and Older Adults in Disasters: Implications for Emergency Management
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Assistive Technology and Older Adults in Disasters: Implications for Emergency Management
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Assistive Technology and Older Adults in Disasters: Implications for Emergency Management
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence and reprint requests to Mary Helen McSweeney-Feld, PhD, Department of Interprofessional Health Studies, Linthicum Hall 121D, Towson University, 8000 York Road, Towson, MD (e-mail: mmcsweeneyfeld@towson.edu).
References
Hide All
1. He, W, Larsen, LJ. Older Americans with a Disability: 2008-2012. American Community Survey Reports ACS-29. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2014.
2. United Nations. World Population Prospects The 2015 Revision: Key Findings and Advance Tables. New York, NY: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations; 2015.
3. Ivanoff, SD, Sonn, U. Changes in the use of assistive devices among 90-year old persons. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17:246-251. doi: 10.1007/BF03324604
4. Garcon, L, Khasnabis, C, Walker, L, et al. Medical and assistive health technology: meeting the needs of aging populations. Gerontologist. 2016;56(S2):S293-302. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw005
5. Federal Emergency Management Association. IS-368: Including People with Disabilities and Others with Access and Functional Needs in Disaster Operations. https://training.fema.gov/is/courseoverview.aspx?code=is-368. Published 2016. Accessed October 25, 2016.
6. Fed Regist. 2014;79(20):4840.
7. Fernandez, LS, Byard, D, Lin, CC, et al. Frail elderly as disaster victims: emergency management strategies. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2002;17(2):67-74.
8. Tomita, MR, Mann, WC, Fraas, LF, et al. Predictors of the use of assistive devices that address physical impairments among community-based frail elders. J Appl Gerontol. 2004;23(2):141-155. doi: 10.1177/0733464804265606
9. US Department of Labor, ADA Facts. https://www.dol.gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/faqs/ADAfaqs.htm. Accessed August 17, 2016.
10. 28 CFR § 35.130(d) (the “integration mandate”).
11. McDermott, S, Martin, K, Gardner, JD. Disaster response for people with disability. Disabil Health J. 2016;9:183-185.
12. Fed Regist. 1991;56(60):4121.
13. American Speech and Hearing Association. . Augmentive and Alternate Communication (AAC). www.asha.org. Published 2013. Accessed May 13, 2016.
14. Banerjee, M, Tanchak, T. Emergency Preparedness Strategies for Persons with Complex Communication Needs. Rockville, MD: The American Speech Language Hearing Association; 2016.
15. Parette, P, Scherer, M. Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2004;39:217-226.
16. Kailes, JI. Emergency Power Planning for People Who Use Electricity and Battery Dependent Assistive Technology and Medical Devices. www.jik.com. Published 2009. Accessed May 13, 2016.
17. Kailes, JI, Enders, A. Moving beyond “special needs”: a function based framework for emergency management and planning. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2007;17(4):230-237.
18. Norwood, F. Promising Practices for Evacuating People with Disabilities. Washington, DC: Inclusion Research Institute; 2011.
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Identifying Vulnerable Older Adults and Legal Options for Increasing Their Protection during All-Hazards Emergencies: A Cross-Sector Guide for States and Communities. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.
20. Wu, PF, Preece, J, Shneiderman, B, et al, Community Response Grids for Older Adults: Motivations, Usability, and Sociability. Presented at The American Conference on Information Systems; 2007.
21. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Emergency Preparedness Checklist for Healthcare Facilities. Washington, DC: CMS; 2013.
22. Calahan, C, Renne, J. Safeguarding independent living: emergency evacuation of the elderly and disabled. InTransition. 2007;7–12:29-31. http://www.intransitionmag.org/spring_2007/v14spring/evacuating_elderly_disabled.pdf. Accessed October 25, 2016.
23. Christensen, KM, Blair, ME, Holt, JM. The built environment, evacuations, and individuals with disabilities. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2007;17(4):249-254.
24. US Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section. Americans with Disabilities Act: ADA Checklist for Emergency Shelters 2007.
25. US Department of Justice ADA requirements: Service Animals. http:www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm. Accessed May 13, 2016.
26. Communities Actively Living Independently & Free v. City of Los Angeles, No. CV 09-0287 CBM RZX, 2011 WL 4595993, (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011).
27. Brooklyn Center for Independence of Disabled v. Bloomberg, 980 F. Supp 2nd 588, 626 (SDNY, 2013).
28. Rutkow, L, Taylor, H, Gable, L. Emergency preparedness and response for disabled individuals: implications of recent litigation. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(S1):91-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12226.
29. Weibgen, AA. The right to be rescued: disability justice in an age of disaster. Yale Law J. 2015;124(7):2202-2679.
30. Cefalu, CA, ed. Disaster Preparedness for Seniors: A Comprehensive Guide for Healthcare Professionals. New York, NY: Springer Publishing; 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0665-9.
31. Al-Rousan, TM, Rubenstein, LM, Wallace, RB. Preparedness for natural disasters among older adults: a nationwide survey. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(3):506-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301559.
32. US Department of Education. Emergency Management Research and People with Disabilities: A Resource Guide. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/guide-emergency-management-pwd.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed October 25, 2016.
33. Anderson, WL, Wiener, JM. The impact of assistive technologies on formal and informal home care. Gerontologist. 2015;55:422-433. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt165
34. Reeder, B, Meyer, E, Lazar, A, et al. Framing the evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(7):565-579. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.03.007.
35. Ivey, SL, Tseng, W, Dahrouge, D, et al. Assessment of state and territorial-level preparedness capacity for serving deaf and hard of hearing populations in disasters. Public Health Rep. 2014;129(2):148-155.
36. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary of Preparedness and Response. HHS Concept of Operations for ESF-8. US DHHS website. http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/mscc/handbook/chapter7/Pages/hhsconcept.aspx. Last updated February 14, 2012. Accessed October 25, 2016.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
  • ISSN: 1935-7893
  • EISSN: 1938-744X
  • URL: /core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 109 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 310 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st November 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.