Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Emergency Preparedness in Elderly Care in Sweden: A Study of Staff Perspectives

  • Carin Björngren Cuadra (a1)
Abstract
Objective

The aim was to investigate the interface between elderly care and emergency preparedness from the elderly care staff’s perspective.

Methods

A web-based questionnaire was sent to elderly care staff in 4 Swedish municipalities. The questions involved experiences of extraordinary events, education and exercises, and risk and vulnerability analyses, evaluations of main risks and emergency preparedness, and familiarity with preparedness plans. In total, 568 elderly care staff responded.

Results

Between 15% and 25% of the respondents claimed experiences of extraordinary events, exercises and education, and risk and vulnerability analyses. The same number claimed familiarity with the organization’s preparedness plan, whereas ~85% answered that they need more education and exercises. Emergency preparedness was evaluated as important. The experiences and risks referred to pertained to both official categories used within emergency preparedness and issues such as work conditions, seniors’ fall accidents.

Conclusion

Elderly care staff, though highly motivated, do not seem to be involved in emergency preparedness and are not targeted to a large extent when education and training are organized. A development of the interface between emergency preparedness and elderly care could require a clarification of the scope and context of emergency preparedness and of differing understandings of central concepts. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:86–93)

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence and reprint requests to Carin Björngren Cuadra, Associate Professor, Department of Social Work, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden (e-mail: carin.cuadra@mah.se).
References
Hide All
1. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap. Strategi för skydda av samhällsviktig verksamhet [Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Strategy for protection of critical infrastructure]. https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/27271.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2016.
2. Social Services Act (No. 453/2001).
3. Szebehely, M, Trydegård, G-B. Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition. Health Soc Care Community. 2012;20(3):300-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01046.x.
4. Socialstyrelsen. Vård i livets slutskede. Socialstyrelsens bedömning av utvecklingen i landsting och kommuner [The Board of Health and Welfare. Care in the End of Life. The Board’s Assessment of the Development in County Councils and Municipalities], Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm. 2006.
5. Socialstyrelsen. Krisberedskap inom socialtjänstens område [The Board of Health and Welfare. Crisis Preparedness in Social Services. A Guidance], Socialstyrelsen, Vägledning. Stockholm. 2009.
6. Act (No. 545/2006) on Measures to be taken by Municipalities and County Council in Preparedness for and during Extraordinary Incidents during Peacetime and Periods of Heightened Alert.
7. Lindberg, H, Sundelius, B. Whole-of-society disaster resilience: the Swedish way. In: Kamien DG, ed. Homeland Security Handbook. New York: The McGraw-Hill; 2012:12951319.
8. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap. Gemensamma grunder för samverkan och ledning vid samhällsstörningar [Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Common ground for cooperation and leadership in societal disturbances]; 2015. https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/27483.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2016.
9. Cuadra, CB. Disaster social work in Sweden: context, practice and challenges in an international perspective. The Nordic Welfare Watch – in Response to Crisis Working Paper, Reykjavik: The Nordic Council of Ministries, University of Iceland, Vol. 1. 2015.
10. Danielsson, E. Following routines: a challenge in cross-sectional collaboration. J Conting Crisis Manage. 2016;24(1):36-45.
11. Hasenfeld, Y. Human Service Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1983.
12. Webb, SA. Social Work in a Risk Society. Social and Political Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
13. Desai, AS. Disaster and social work responses. In: Dominelli L, ed. Revitalising Communities in a Globalising World. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007:261-275.
14. International Association of Schools of Social Work. Policy Document on Disaster Interventions for Consideration by IASSW Board: January 2010, Position Paper. http://www.iassw-aiets.org/sustainability-climate-change-disaster-intervention-committee/. Accessed May 10, 2016.
15. Enander, A., Hede, S., Lajksjö, O. 2014 Why worry? Motivation for crisis preparedness work among municipal leaders in Sweden. J Conting Crisis Mange. 23(1):1-10.
16. Sparf, J. Tillit i samhällsskyddets organisation. Om det sociala gränssnittet mellan kommuner och funktionshindrade i risk- och krishantering [Trust in civil protection and preparedness. On the social interface in risk and crisis management between disabled people and municipal organisation]. Mid University, Östersund; 2014.
17. Nieminen Kristofersson, T. Krisgrupper och spontant stöd. Om insatser efter branden I Göteborg 1998 [Crisis groups and spontaneous support. On interventions in the wake of the Gothenburg fire]. School of Social Work, Lund: Lund University; 2002.
18. Teasley, M, Moore, JA. Disaster recovery case management: social work and multicultural education. In: Gillespie DF, Danso K, eds. Disaster Concepts and Issues: A Guide for Social Work Education and Practice. Alexandria, VA: CSWE Press; 2010:214-254.
19. Thomas, RL, Healy, L. Be prepared: incorporating disaster content in an era of gloablization and climate change. In: Gillespie D, Danso K, eds. Disasters and Concepts and Issues. A Guide for Social Work Education and Practice. Alexandria, VA: CSWE-Press; 2010:89-110.
20. Gillespie, DF, Danso, K. eds. Disaster Concepts and Issues: A Guide for Social Work Education and Practice. Alexandria, VA: CSWE Press; 2010.
21. Soligman, HH, Rogge, ME. Ethical considerations in disaster services: a social work perspective. Electron J Soc Work. 2002;1(1):1-22.
22. Gutman, GM, Yon, Y. Elder abuse and neglect in disasters: types, prevalence and research gaps. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2014;10:38-47.
23. Eydal, GB, Ómarsdóttir, IL, Cuadra, CB, et al, Local social services in Nordic countries in times of disasters. Report for the Nordic Council of Ministers; Reykjavik; 2016.
24. Ethical Review Act (No. 460/2003).
25. Robson, C. Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner – Researchers. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2002.
26. Bryman, A. Social Research Methods, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
27. Socialstyrelsen. Socialstyrelsens risk- och sårbarhetsanalys 2014 [The Board of Health and Welfare Stockholm. Risk and vulnerability analysis 2014]. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm; 2015.
28. Sannerstedt, A. Implementering – hur politiska beslut genomförs i praktiken [Implementation – how political decisions are put into practice]. In: Rothstein B, ed. Politisk organisation. Förvaltningspolitikens grundproblem [Political Organisation. The Basic Problems of Political Management]. Stockholm: SNS Förlag; 2001:18-48.
29. Renn, O, Klinke, A, van Asselt, M. Coping with complexities, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: a synthesis. Ambio. 2011;40:231-246.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
  • ISSN: 1935-7893
  • EISSN: 1938-744X
  • URL: /core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 44 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 197 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 31st July 2017 - 18th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.