Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Factors Affecting Hospital-based Nurses' Willingness to Respond to a Radiation Emergency


Background: Despite increased government and public awareness of the threat of a radiological emergency resulting from a terrorist attack or industrial accident, limited emphasis has been placed on preparing the US health care workforce for such an event. The purpose of this study was to develop and apply a rapid survey to evaluate hospital-based nurses' baseline knowledge, self-assessed clinical competence, perception of personal safety, and willingness to respond in the event of a radiological emergency.

Methods: The study was conducted in 2 phases, the first targeting nursing units likely to respond in the event of a radiological emergency and the second focusing more generally on members of the New York State Emergency Nurses Association currently employed as hospital-based nurses.

Results: Among the 668 nurses surveyed, baseline knowledge was found to be inadequate. Although baseline knowledge, clinical competence, and perception of personal safety were all positively associated with willingness to respond, perception of safety appeared to be the primary determinant. Furthermore, baseline knowledge did not appear to be strongly associated with perception of personal safety.

Conclusions: Based on these results, the investigators recommend further clinical training to enhance preparedness and a more detailed exploration of the determinants of perceived personal safety. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008;2:224–229)

Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Tener Goodwin Veenema, University of Rochester School of Nursing, 601 Elmwood Ave, Box SON, Rochester, NY 14642(e-mail:
Hide All
3. TG Veenema , J Toke . When standards of care change in mass-casualty events. Am J Nurs. 2007; 107: 72A72F.

7. TG Veenema , PA Karam . Radiation: clinical responses to radiologic incidents and emergencies. Am J Nurs. 2003; 103: 3240.

8. S Shiralkar , A Rennie , M Snow , et alDoctors' knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ. 2003; 327: 371372.

10. JT Bushberg , LA Kroger , MB Hartman , et alNuclear/radiological terrorism: emergency department management of radiation casualties. J Emerg Med. 2007; 32: 7185.

13. MW Chaffee . Making the decision to report to work in a disaster: nurses may have conflicting obligations. Am J Nurs. 2006; 106: 5457.

14. C O'Boyle , C Robertson , M Secor-Turner . Nurses' beliefs about public health emergencies: fear of abandonment. Am J Infect Control. 2006; 34: 351357.

15. JM Converse , S Presser . Survey Questions: Handcrafting the Standardized Questionnaire. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications1986 .

19. R Baron , D Kenny . The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51: 11731182.

20. J Bennett . Mediator and moderator variables in nursing research: conceptual and statistical differences. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23: 415420.

21. CS Fullerton , RJ Ursano , J Reeves , et alPerceived safety in disaster workers following 9/11. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2006; 194: 6163.

22. C O'Boyle , C Robertson , M Secor-Turner . Public health emergencies: nurses' recommendations for effective actions. AAOHN J. 2006; 54: 347353.

24. K Qureshi , RR Gershon , MF Sherman , et alHealth care workers' ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. J Urban Health. 2005; 82: 378388.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
  • ISSN: 1935-7893
  • EISSN: 1938-744X
  • URL: /core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 167 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.