Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Measuring Individual Disaster Recovery: A Socioecological Framework

  • David M. Abramson, Tasha Stehling-Ariza, Yoon Soo Park, Lauren Walsh and Derrin Culp...
Abstract

Background: Disaster recovery is a complex phenomenon. Too often, recovery is measured in singular fashion, such as quantifying rebuilt infrastructure or lifelines, without taking in to account the affected population's individual and community recovery. A comprehensive framework is needed that encompasses a much broader and far-reaching construct with multiple underlying dimensions and numerous causal pathways; without the consideration of a comprehensive framework that investigates relationships between these factors, an accurate measurement of recovery may not be valid. This study proposes a model that encapsulates these ideas into a single framework, the Socio-Ecological Model of Recovery.

Methods: Using confirmatory factor analysis, an operational measure of recovery was developed and validated using the five measures of housing stability, economic stability, physical health, mental health, and social role adaptation. The data were drawn from a sample of displaced households following Hurricane Katrina. Measures of psychological strength, risk, disaster exposure, neighborhood contextual effects, and formal and informal help were modeled to examine their direct and indirect effects on recovery using a structural equation model.

Findings: All five elements of the recovery measure were positively correlated with a latent measure of recovery, although mental health and social role adaptation displayed the strongest associations. An individual's psychological strength had the greatest association with positive recovery, followed by having a household income greater than $20 000 and having informal social support. Those factors most strongly associated with an absence of recovery included the time displaced since the hurricane, being disabled, and living in a community with substantial social disorder.

Discussion: The socio-ecological framework provides a robust means for measuring recovery, and for testing those factors associated with the presence or absence of recovery.

(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2010;4:S46-S54)

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr David Abramson, National Center for Disaster Preparedness, Columbia University, 215 W 125th St, Suite 303, New York, NY 10027 (e-mail: dma3@columbia.edu).
References
Hide All
1.Cutter, SL, Boruff, BJ, Shirley, WL.Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q. 2003;84:242261.
2.Green, B, Solomon, S.The mental health impact of natural and technological disasters. In: Hobfoll JFaS, ed. Traumatic Stress: From Theory to Practice. New York: Plenum; 1995:163-180.
3.Benight, CC, Bandura, A.Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42 (10):11291148.
4.Norris, FH, Stevens, SP, Pfefferbaum, B, Wyche, KF, Pfefferbaum, RL.Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41 (1-2):127150.
5.Bates, FL, Pelanda, C.An ecological approach to disasters. In: Dynes RR, Tierney KJ, eds. Disasters, Collective Behavior, and Social Organization. Newark: University of Delaware Press; 1993:145-159.
6.Edwards, MLK.An interdisciplinary perspective on disasters and stress: the promise of an ecological framework. Sociol Forum. 1998;13:115132.
7.Kothari, A, Edwards, N, Yanicki, S, et alSocioecological models: strengthening intervention research in tobacco control. Drogues Sante Societe. 2007;6:iii5iii6.
8.Tatsuki, S.Long-term life recovery processes among survivors of the 1995 Kobe earthquake: 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2005 Life Recovery Social Survey results. J Disaster Res. 2007;2:484501.
9.Koshiyama, K.Analysis of sense of recovery of residents living in disaster recovery public housing. J Inst Soc Safety Sci. 2003;3:237244.
10.Tatsuki, S, Hayashi, H.Family system adjustment and adaptive reconstruction of social reality among the 1995 earthquake survivors. Int J Jpn Sociol. 2000;9:81110.
11.Bratt, RG.Housing and family well-being. Housing Stud. 2002;17:1326.
12.Peacock, WG, Dash, N, Zhang, Y.Sheltering and housing recovery following disaster. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR, eds. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer; 2006:258-274.
13.Fothergill, A, Peek, LA.Poverty and disasters in the United States: a review of recent sociological findings. Nat Hazards. 2004;32:89110.
14.Enarson, E, Morrow, BH.The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through Women's Eyes. Westport, CT: Praeger.; 1998.
15.Morrow, BH.Stretching the bonds: the families of Andrew. In: Peacock WG, Morrow BH, Gladwin H, eds. Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disasters. London: Routledge; 1997:141-170.
16.National Research Council. Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.; 2006.
17.Smith, GP, Wenger, D.Sustainable disaster recovery: operationalizing an existing agenda. In: Rodriguez H, Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR, eds. Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer; 2006:234-257.
18.Heller, T.The effects of involuntary residential relocation: a review. Am J Community Psychol. 1982;10 (4):471492.
19.Reich, JW.Three psychological principles of resilience in natural disasters. Disaster Prev Manage. 2006;15:793798.
20.Silove, D, Steel, Z.Understanding community psychosocial needs after disasters: implications for mental health services. J Postgrad Med. 2006;52 (2):121125.
21.Chamlee-Wright, ER.The long road back: signal noise in the post-Katrina context. Independent Rev. 2007;12:235259.
22.Chamlee-Wright, ER, Daniel, M.Disastrous Uncertainty: How Government Disaster Policy Undermines Community Rebound. Mercatus Policy Series, Policy Comment No. 9. Arlington, VA: Mercatus Center at George Mason University.; 2007:29.
23.Abramson, D, Stehling-Ariza, T, Garfield, R, Redlener, I.Prevalence and predictors of mental health distress post-Katrina: findings from the Gulf Coast Child and Family Health Study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2 (2):7786.
24.Lee, SY.Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian Approach. New York: Wiley.; 2007.
25.Ware, JE Jr, Kosinski, M, Keller, SD.A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34 (3):220233.
26.Ware, JE JrImprovements in short-form measures of health status: introduction to a series. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61 (1):15.
27.Bollen, KA.Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.; 1989.
28.Schwarzer, R, Jerusalem, S.Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, eds. Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON; 1995:35-37.
29.Allen, MJ, Yen, WM.Introduction to Measurement Theory. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.; 2002.
30.Cook, TD, Campbell, DT.Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues in Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.; 1979.
31.Bagozzi, RP, Yi, Y, Phillips, LW.Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm Sci Q. 1991;36:421458.
32.Hu, LT, Bentler, PM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:155.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
  • ISSN: 1935-7893
  • EISSN: 1938-744X
  • URL: /core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed