Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T20:05:21.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Online Social Interaction for COVID-19 in Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2024

Seungil Yum*
Affiliation:
Ph.D. Landscape and urban planning, Cheongju University, Cheongju, Korea, 28503
*
Corresponding author: Seungil Yum; Email: yumseungil@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While prior studies have barely explored social interaction for COVID-19 across Asia, this study highlights how people interact with each other for the COVID-19 pandemic among India, Japan, and South Korea based on social network analysis by employing NodeXL for Twitter between July 27 and July 28, 2020. This study finds that the Ministry of Health and Prime Minister of India, news media of Japan, and the president of South Korea play the most essential role in social networks in their country, respectively. Second, governmental key players play the most crucial role in South Korea, whereas they play the least role in India. Third, the Indian are interested in COVID-19 deaths, the Japanese care about the information of COVID-19 patients, and the South Korean focus on COVID-19 vaccines. Therefore, governments and disease experts should explore their social interaction based on the characteristics of social networks to release important news and information in a timely manner.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc

Coronavirus (COVID-19) is one of the worst phenomena across the world. As of August 3, 2020, about 18 million cases of COVID‑19 have been reported in more than 188 countries, resulting in more than 650,000 deaths. In this sense, controlling the COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most important issues for countries all over the world.Reference Anderson, Heesterbeek and Klinkenberg 1 Reference Hopman, Allegranzi and Mehtar 5

Most governments and centers for disease control have investigated how COVID-19 plays a severe role in human life and tried to provide true information on COVID-19.Reference Du, Xu and Wu 6 Reference Wu and McGoogan 10 For example, the government of India releases important COVID-19 information on its homepage because there is a lot of false information to be found elsewhere. Also, there is no evidence that regularly rinsing the nose with saline has protected people from infection with COVID-19. Garlic is healthy, but there is no evidence from the current outbreak that eating garlic has protected people from COVID-19.

Scholars have explored the effects of COVID-19 on people and the growth rate across the world.Reference Adhikari, Meng and Wu 11 Reference Zhou, Yu and Du 15 For example, Courtemanche et al. highlight that adoption of government-imposed social distancing measures reduced the daily growth rate by 5.4 percentage points after 1-5 days, 6.8 after 6-10 days, 8.2 after 11-15 days, and 9.1 after 16-20 days based on US counties between March 1, 2020 and April 27, 2020.Reference Courtemanche, Garuccio and Le 16

However, many previous studies have focused on the effects of COVID-19 on Europe or the US.Reference Covid and Team 17 Reference Valdez, Ten Thij and Bathina 21 Therefore, this study explores how individuals interact with each other surrounding the COVID-19 issue in Asia by employing social network analysis (SNA) for Twitter, which is one of the most popular Social Network Services (SNS). SNS are some of the most crucial information resources in our information technology era, and most people get relevant information on COVID-19 on the internet. Therefore, understanding the communication networks for COVID-19 on the internet can assist governments in providing relevant news and information to the public.

Specifically, this study chooses 3 Asian countries: India, Japan, and South Korea. While some may wonder why China was not chosen for the study, people in mainland China cannot use Twitter unless they use the virtual private network (VPN) because the Chinese government blocks worldwide US platforms, such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.

This study selected these 3 countries because India is the top Asian country (India, Japan, and South Korea) and ranks third in the world for COVID-19. Japan is an important case because of the high number of COVID-19 patients and the pandemic on board Diamond Princess. South Korea is one of the best examples of coping with the COVID-19 pandemic in the world.Reference Park, Choi and Ko 24 Reference Her 26 To the best of my knowledge, this study is the first article exploring social networks for COVID-19 based on various countries in Asia by employing social network analysis for Twitter.

Literature Review

COVID-19 Across Asia

COVID-19 is a respiratory illness caused by a new virus, resulting in fever, coughing, a sore throat, and shortness of breath. It was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan City in China. COVID-19 is a new form of coronavirus that is similar to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).

Governments and centers for disease control have put a lot of effort into minimizing COVID-19 damage.Reference Zhang, Wang and Yang 25 For example, many European countries initiated unprecedented non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as the closure of schools and universities, social distancing, banning of mass gatherings and public events, case isolation, and lockdowns.Reference Flaxman, Mishra and Gandy 19 The Chinese government implemented Suspending Classes Without Stopping Learning launched by the Ministry of Education, a switch from school teaching activities to large-scale online teaching while schools were closed.Reference Zhang, Wang and Yang 25

Asian countries, such as India, Japan, and South Korea, show different preparedness and response to COVID-19.Reference Her 26 Reference Watanabe 28 For instance, India shows a different COVID-19 response at the state level. Kerala utilizes its experience with the Nipah virus in 2018 to use contact tracing, extensive testing, and community mobilization to control the virus and maintain the very low mortality rate. Maharashtra utilizes unmanned aerial vehicles to monitor physical distancing during lockdown. All houses within 3 km are investigated to discover further cases, trace contacts, and increase awareness if 3 or more patients are confirmed.Reference Lancet 22

Japan does not enforce social distancing rules and implement mandatory lockdown, as seen in other countries. Instead, the Japanese government politely requests people’s voluntary self-restraint to avoid crowded areas and settings where there may be close range conversations, as well as spots that have poor ventilation.Reference Hayasaki 23

South Korea smartly employs its advanced information technology (IT) for tracking COVID-19 patients or those who are in contact with the COVID-19 patents. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) can collect COVID-19 patient data to minimize the disease pandemic at the national level, such as personal identification information, location data, immigration records, medical and prescription records, card transaction data, transit pass records for public transportation, and closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage.Reference Park, Choi and Ko 24

Online social interaction for COVID-19 significantly decreases social interaction in the real world and increases social interaction in the online world.Reference Budhwani and Sun 29 Reference Muric, Wu and Ferrara 31 This is because COVID-19 has a seriously high infection rate, and people get important news and information about COVID-19 online. In addition, many governments enforce some form of “lockdown” to decrease the spread of COVID-19 among people and release COVID-19 reports and infection rates through their SNS and official homepages.

In this background, Twitter has become one of the best sources for understanding what made countries differ in their COVID response strategy.Reference Gallotti, Valle and Castaldo 32 Reference Yum 37 For example, Nia et al. highlight macroeconomic responses to the COVID-19 pandemic using Twitter sentiments according to lower-middle (Nigeria), upper-middle (South Africa), and high (Canada) income.Reference Nia, Ahmadi and Bragazzi 35 Perlstein and Verboord show public discourses on political authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic across Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden.Reference Perlstein and Lockdowns 36

Many scholars have highlighted how people have communicated with others by employing social network analysis for COVID-19.Reference Yum 37 Reference Pascual-Ferrá, Alperstein and Barnett 38 For example, Yum highlights that people are more likely to show communication networks within groups in New York, whereas those are more apt to exhibit communication networks across groups in California.Reference Yum 37 Pascual-Ferrá et al. report that the network of conversations around COVID-19 is highly decentralized, fragmented, and loosely connected during 3 key communication events from late January to early June of 2020.Reference Pascual-Ferrá, Alperstein and Barnett 38

Some scholars have explored the relationship between COVID and social network services in Asia.Reference Choi 39 Reference Puriwat and Tripopsakul 40 For instance, Choi shows that social media use directly and indirectly impacts people’s negative emotions through social distancing and risk perception during the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea.Reference Choi 39 Faruk et al. reveal that SNS play a significant role in disseminating news related to the pandemic based on primary data collected from 400 successful respondents.Reference Puriwat and Tripopsakul 40 However, they have not highlighted how people interact with each other around COVID-19-related issues by employing SNA for Twitter across Asian countries. Therefore, this study explores the interaction among people regarding COVID-19 in India, Japan, and South Korea.

Research Methodology

This study employs SNA to highlight the social networks of COVID-19 in India, Japan, and South Korea. SNA is the practice of representing nodes for people and edges connecting 2 or more nodes as graphs.Reference Macarrón Máñez, Moreno Cano and Díez 41 Reference Völker 43 SNA is becoming increasingly important in many academic fields.Reference Ennett and Bauman 44 Reference Zohar and Tenne-Gazit 49 This study utilizes Twitter data to highlight online communications of people for COVID-19 across public key players. Twitter has been widely used for big data analyses.Reference Alotaibi, Mehmood and Katib 50 Reference Yadranjiaghdam, Yasrobi and Tabrizi 53 This study employs the NodeXL program based on COVID-19 keywords and the countries (COVID-19 and India, COVID-19 and Japan, and COVID-19 and Korea) between July 21 and July 28, 2020 because COVID-19 exerted a serious impact on Asian countries during this period.Reference Woo, Cho and Shim 54 For example, India is the top Asian country and ranks third in the world for COVID-19 as of July 28, 2020. While this study employs the NodeXL program between the days, NodeXL allows the author to gather Twitter data for COVID-19 from December, 2019. This study selects the best data set for the analyses (July 27 and July 28), which contains the highest number of Twitter users, communication networks, and suitable pieces of content.

This study employs NodeXL to explore the social networks of India, Japan, and South Korea for COVID-19. NodeXL is a visualization software program, which supports social networks and content analysis. NodeXL has been extensively used to analyze social network systems in academic fields.Reference Biddix, Park and Collom 55 Reference Jagals and Van der Walt 56

This study employs the “betweenness centrality” method to capture public key players for Twitter users because between centrality is one of the most useful methods of calculating the importance of users.Reference Barthelemy 57 Reference Newman 59 To be specific, “betweenness centrality” calculates the fraction of shortest paths passing through a vertex.Reference Wen-mei 60 Betweenness centrality is a widely used measure that captures a person’s role in allowing information to pass from one part of the network to the other.Reference Golbeck 61 Many studies on social network analysis for COVID-19 employ between centrality to explore important nodes of social networks.Reference Lonergan and Chalmers 90 Reference Durmaz and Hengirmen 92 This study chooses the top 20 key players among all Twitter users based on the magnitude of between centrality (Table 1).

Figure 1. Between centrality.

Note. The label is explained in Tables 24.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics

This study first shows betweenness centrality, the clustering coefficient, and reciprocated vertex pair ratio to highlight social networks for COVID 19 in India, Japan, and South Korea. The clustering coefficient measures the degree to which nodes in a graph tend to cluster together. In most real-world networks, and in particular social networks, nodes are more likely to create tightly knit groups categorized by a relatively high density of ties. This likelihood tends to be greater than the average probability of a tie randomly established between 2nodes.Reference Holland and Leinhardt 62 Reference Watts and Strogatz 63 Reciprocated vertex pair ratio is ratio between ingoing and outgoing networks in directed relationships. It is the proportion of vertices (Twitter users) that have a network returned to them. Higher reciprocated vertex pair ratio shows a person engages in more 2-way interaction.Reference Yen, Bozkurt and Tu 64

This study also employs content analyses by looking into the most important tweets because content analysis of Twitter data can provide essential information about public health crises.Reference Çalışkan, Özsezer and Pay 65 Reference Mermer and Özsezer 66 The contents demonstrate the public discourse on Twitter regarding COVID-19 among the countries. To be specific, this study analyzes the tweets which have the highest number of retweets or favorites among Twitter users in COVID-19 social networks and utilizes them as the examples of the findings in the results section.

Next, this study employs cluster analysis by utilizing the Clauset–Newman–Moore cluster algorithm. Cluster analysis is a methodology for the task of assigning a set of objects into groups so that the objects in the same cluster are more similar to each other than those in other clusters. The Clauset-Newman-Moore cluster algorithm calculates modularity as a property of a network to create a category of that network into groups. It measures when the category is a good one, in the sense that there are many edges within groups and only a few between them.Reference Clauset, Newman and Moore 67 Reference Udanor, Aneke and Ogbuokiri 68

Results

Figures 1-3 show that social networks for COVID-19 are differentiated by type and country. For example, in the between centrality networks and key players in India are clustered in the central part of the social networks. Key players in Japan are dispersed across the networks. Key players in South Korea are concentrated in specific parts of the networks. In the clustering coefficient networks, N3 (RT en Español) has its own networks in India. Nodes show more dispersed patterns in Japan. In contrast, nodes are more concentrated patterns in Korea. In the reciprocated vertex pair ratio networks, most key players are located in the central part of the network circle in India. G5 (Abe Shinzo: Prime Minister of Japan) is separate from other key players in Japan. G8 (Daejeon: South Korea’s fifth-largest metropolis) and N8 (Yonhap News: South Korean news agency) show some distance from other key players in Korea.

Tables 2-4 show the top 20 key players according to countries. In the India networks, the Ministry of Health and Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India, play the most important role in social networks for COVID-19 (first and second, respectively). PMO India, which is the Prime Minister’s Office, also exerts a significant impact on social networks of COVID-19 (fourth). This is because people tend to mention the Ministry of Health, the Prime Minister, and the Prime Minister’s Office in their tweets at the same time to share important information and news. For example, “For the first time, India’s death rate due to the COVID-19 pandemic is less than 2.5% and India is in a better position than many other countries. Watch this video for more information. #IndiaFightsCorona @PIB_India @MoHFW_India @PMOIndia https://t.co/UqZitX1uPh.”

Figure 2. The clustering coefficient.

Table 2. The top 20 key players in India

Note. BC: Between centrality, G: Governmental key player, N: Non-governmental key player

Table 3. The top 20 key players in Japan

The second remarkable characteristic is that news media play a crucial role in social networks in India, whereas India has the least governmental key players. For example, 12 of the top 20 key players are news media, consisting of 60% of the top players. The number of news media is 2 times more than that of governmental key players (6). This is because many news media deliver important COVID-19 news to Indian people. For example, “Nearly one in four people in India’s capital may have contracted Covid-19, study finds https://t.co/RMMrujl6nm.”

The third interesting finding is that Hispanic key players have a huge impact on social networks for COVID-19. For example, CNN en Español, which is the Pan-American Spanish-language news channel, and RT en Español, which is the Spanish-language pay television channel of the RT network, rank third and sixth, respectively. People tend to retweet some important tweets written in Spanish to share numbers related to COVID-19. For example, “Estos son los 10 países con más muertos por covid-19, según Johns Hopkins (These are the 10 countries with the most deaths from covid-19, according to Johns Hopkins): https://t.co/1w5UKDgPaR EE.UU.: 141.992, Brasil: 81.487, Reino Unido: 45.507, México: 40.400, Italia: 35.073, Francia: 30.168, España: 28.424, India: 28.084, Irán: 14.634, Perú: 13.579.”

In the Japan networks, news media play the most important role in social networks of COVID-19. Yahoo! News, which is the news website that originated as an internet-based news aggregator by Yahoo!, ranks first. For the sake of readers, Yahoo! Japan’s web portal is the most visited website in Japan, and its internet services are mostly dominant in the country. NHK news, which is the Japan’s national broadcast, places second. Its official English name is Japan Broadcasting Corporation and owned by the government of Japan. Also, NHK news channels exert a powerful effect on social networks for COVID-19. For instance, not only do NHK news channels take second, but also, NHK seikatsu, which is the NHK account that delivers information on disasters, takes ninth, NHK sports places seventeenth, and NHK shutoken, which is the news for the capital region, ranks nineteenth. People frequently share COVID-19 news with the link provided by major news media sites. For example, Yahoo! News uploaded its tweet as follows:

“連休が感染拡大のヤマ 医師会 (Consecutive holidays spread infection Yama Medical Association) https://t.co/sne5T9wpLW.”

On the other hand, Japan has 8 governmental key players and shows an interesting characteristic. All governmental key players are politicians, whereas India has the same number between politicians and governmental institutes and South Korea has a smaller number of politicians than governmental institutes. For example, Yukio Hatoyama, the former Prime Minister of Japan, ranks third, and Mori Masako, the Minister of Justice places fourth. Genki Sudo, the Politician who serves as a member of the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, takes fifth, and Hirofumi Yoshimura, the Governor of Osaka, places seventh. This is because many Japanese politicians upload their opinions and information on their Twitter. For example, Yukio Hatoyama uploaded his tweets as follows:

“在日米軍が漸くコロナの感染者数を発表した。沖縄で調べた数字より少ないことが気になるが、地元の批判で方針を転換した。ただ気になるのは、米軍はロックダウン(封鎖)と言いながら、基地のメインゲートは開いたままで、車両の出入りは続いていることだ。相変わらず米軍は日本を植民地と思っている。(The US military in Japan finally announced the number of people infected by Corona. I am worried that the number is lower than the number that I researched in Okinawa, but I changed my policy due to local criticism. The only thing that bothers me is that the main gate of the base remains open and vehicles continue to enter and exit, even though the US military says it is in lockdown. The U.S. military still regards Japan as a colony.)”

In the South Korea networks, Moon Jae-in, the president of South Korea and the Blue House, the executive office and official residence of the president of the Republic of Korea, play the most pivotal role in social networks of COVID-19 (first and second, respectively). Also, governmental key players play the most significant role in social networks for COVID-19. For example, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs ranks seventh, and Han Junho, a member of the National Assembly of South Korea, places ninth. The Ministry of Gender Equality and Family and Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism rank twelfth and fourteenth, respectively. Cho Kuk, former Minister of Justice of South Korea, ranks fifteenth, and Daejeon, the fifth-largest metropolis in South Korea, takes eighteenth. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport places nineteenth. Results show that the Ministries of South Korea play an important role in social networks for COVID-19. This is because Korea has a democratic unitary political system, and its public health governance is centralized.Reference You 69 Therefore, citizens get important information and news from the Ministries of South Korea. For example, the Blue House uploaded its tweet about President Moon’s COVID-19 response and shared it with South Korea’s citizens as follows:

“문재인 대통령은 한국시각으로 16일 새벽, 워싱턴 포스트에 코로나19 백신의 공정하고 투명한 분배를 촉구하는 글을 공동 기고했습니다 (President Moon Jae-in co-contributed an article to the Washington Post on the morning of thesixteenth, Korean time, calling for a fair and transparent distribution of the Corona 19 vaccine).”

Another remarkable finding is that female key players have a significant impact on social networks for COVID-19. For example, Women news and the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family rank third and twelfth. Also, YouTube ranks fifth, which is 4 times higher than its role in Japan, implying that YouTube plays a more important role in social networks in South Korea than Japan.

Figure 4 highlights the social networks of COVID-19 for the typical case. In the India networks, nodes make a large circle and a small rectangle. All key players are concentrated in the central part of the circle except for CNN en Español (N1) and RT en Español (N3). N1 is located in the right side of the circle, and N3 is located in the lower part of the rectangle. The results show that Hispanic key players have different social networks, compared to other key players. In the Japan networks, nodes are more dispersed than those in India, but they still are concentrated as a large circle and have many nodes under the circle. Key players show the most dispersed pattern among the 3 countries. Yukio Hatoyama (G1) is placed in the center of the circle, whereas Abe Shinzo (G5) is located in the outside of the circle. In the South Korea networks, nodes are highly distributed in the social networks, whereas key players are relatively concentrated in the central part except for the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism (G6), Daejeon (G8), and Yonhap News (N8).

Figure 3. Reciprocated vertex pair ratio.

Table 4. The top 20 key players in South Korea

Figure 4. Social networks for the typical case.

Figure 5 demonstrates the social networks of COVID-19 according to groups. In the India networks, most key players are located in large groups. All key players have their social networks within group 20, and 16 key players are within group 10. For example, Congress (G4) and Ashok Swain (N12) have their social networks in group 1, and the Ministry of Health (G1), Narendra Modi (G2), PMO India (G3), Harsh Vardhan (G5), and Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank (G6) belong to group 2. All governmental key players have the same communication group except for Congress.

Figure 5. Social networks according to groups.

In contrast, in the Japan networks, key players tend to belong to small groups. This is the most different characteristic of Japan, compared to India and South Korea. For example, only 2 key players are located within group 10. Nobuto Hosaka (G7) has its channel in group 6, and Kazuo Shii (G6) is placed in group 7. NHK news (N2), Sankei news (N6), and Abe Shinzo (G5) belong to group 12.

In contrast, in the South Korea networks, many key players are concentrated in group 1. Eight of the top 20 key players are placed in group 1. For example, the Blue House plays the central role in group 1, and the Ministries of South Korea, such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (G3), Ministry of Gender Equality and Family (G5), and Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (G9), are concentrated in group 1. In contrast, Moon Jae-in, the president of South Korea, has his own separate group (group 4).

Lastly, this study employs website analyses to understand people’s interests according to countries (see Table 5). In the India networks, people are most interested in COVID-19 deaths. The URL indicates that the fatality rate dropped to 2.43%, among the lowest in the world. The Union Health and Family Welfare Ministry on Tuesday announced that the death rate due to COVID-19 complications in India has fallen to 2.43 per cent from 2.97% on July 1, 2020. Rajesh Bhushan, the officer on special duty of the Health Ministry, mentioned that the number of COVID-19 deaths per million people in India continues to be among the lowest in the world.

Table 5. The top URLs

In the Japan networks, people care about how Japan can manage the information of COVID-19 patients for epidemiological analysis and the infection route. The URL shows that COVID-19 has different infection rates and mortality rates depending on races and countries. Therefore, they suggest 2 urgent needs to improve the current government response. First, the number of nationally infected persons by nationality is not disclosed. Secondly, the number of infected persons in the airport quarantine has not been revealed before the nationality breakdown of Japanese nationals and foreign nationals. The next interests are a report on the re-expansion of COVID-19, Japan’s low severity and mortality of COVID-19, 4 consecutive holidays for COVID-19, and curfews.

In the South Korea networks, people focus on South Korea successfully securing COVID-19 vaccines. The URL highlights that South Korea made a letter of intent, a document outlining an understanding between 2 or more parties intended to be formalized in a legally binding agreement, with AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca PLC is a British-Swedish multinational pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical company with its global headquarters in Cambridge, England, which is one of the fastest companies developing the COVID-19 vaccine. The next URL contains the same news about the letter of intent with AstraZeneca. The next interests are the support of the South Korean government in bringing Korean people back from foreign countries, the successful car sales during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the relationship between low COVID-19 patients and Kimchi, which is a traditional food of South Korea.

Discussion

The findings of this study can be summarized as follows: key players are clustered in the central part of the networks, with most concentrated in large groups in India. In contrast, in Japan, key players are dispersed across the networks and tend to belong to smaller groups. In South Korea, key players are concentrated in specific parts of the networks, with many located in Group 1. In India, the Ministry of Health and the Prime Minister play the most significant roles, while news media are central in Japan’s networks. In South Korea, the executive office and official residence of the President play the most pivotal roles. People in India are primarily concerned with COVID-19 deaths, while those in Japan are more interested in infection routes. In contrast, South Koreans focus on vaccines (see Table 6).

Table 6. The different results among India, Japan, and Korea

This study finds some scientific findings and compares the findings among countries to provide their importance to policy as follows: first, India has multiple social networks according to their languages, inconsistent with Japan and South Korea. This is because India writes in many languages and speaks in many more voices. According to the government of India, there are 22 official languages in India under the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution as of 2022. 70 Therefore, governments and disease experts should deliver important news and information on COVID-19 in multiple languages.Reference Grover, Sahoo and Mehra 71 Reference Raman, Rajalakshmi and Surya 73

In the Japan networks, news media are some of the most powerful institutions affecting the lives of citizens. Japanese citizens tend to learn about what their government does from their news media, such as Yahoo and NHK.Reference Krauss 74 News media are the most frequently used sources of information among all information sources in the COVID-19 news and information in Japan.Reference Inoue, Shimoura and Nagai-Tanima 75 Therefore, governments and disease experts should deliver important COVID-19 news and information via famous news media accounts.

In the Korea networks, female key players have a significant impact on social networks for COVID-19. This is because Moon Jae-in is a feminist president and supports various feminism organizations and institutes under his administration. 76 Many female key players, such as Women news and the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family, have strong political influence not only in the real world, but also on SNS.Reference Han 77 Reference Kim and Chang 79 In this background, many females get important COVID-19 news and information through these female news sites and the Ministry of Gender Equality and Family and more actively share important news and resources and talk about the COVID-19 pandemic because females are more concerned about the COVID-19 issue than males.Reference Czymara, Langenkamp and Cano 80 Reference Zhang, Xu and Li 82 Therefore, the Korean government and disease experts should understand the female networks and deliver important news and information on COVID-19 in a timely manner to relieve women’s concern and stress.

This study has some important implications. First, governments and centers for disease control should investigate key players in their country because key players are differentiated by countries. Second, governments should find out which governmental key players play an important role in the social networks of their country because some governmental key players exert significant impacts on social networks related to COVID-19. Third, governments should explore the social networks of COVID-19 according to groups because they show different characteristics by countries. Fourth, governments and policy makers should understand people’s interests and needs by exploring SNS to provide valuable information on COVID-19 to their citizens, relieving concern and anxiety in a timely manner.

This study has some limitations. First, social network analysis was employed between July 27 and July 28, 2020 because this period experienced the highest number of Twitter users, communication networks, and suitable contents; therefore, the social networks for COVID-19 could be further differentiated by periods. Future studies should investigate COVID-19 according to a multitude of periods. Second, this study explores social networks for COVID-19 in the online world, while social networks for COVID-19 might be different in the real world. Future research should explore social networks in the real world, as well. Third, this study employed SNA for COVID-19 for Twitter because Twitter has become one of the most important data resources for COVID-19;Reference Kausar, Soosaimanickam and Nasar 83 SNS of other platforms could show results different from those of Twitter. Therefore, future articles should investigate other platforms, such as Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram.

COVID-19 is one of the most serious diseases in the history of humankind. Governments and policymakers enhance social distancing and lockdowns for COVID-19, and people interact with each other through SNS to get important news and information on COVID-19.Reference Benke, Autenrieth and Asselmann 85 Reference Litt, Rodriguez and Stewart 89 With this background, this study provides useful implications and guidelines for understanding online social interaction surrounding COVID-19. By understanding the top key players and social networks for COVID-19, governments and disaster experts could deliver important COVID-19-related news and updates to their citizens in a timely manner.

Conclusions

COVID-19 has completely changed people’s normal lives, and people are worried about contact with others in person. Most people stay at home for social distancing and search for relevant information on COVID-19 on the internet. Therefore, understanding online social networks is essential for governments providing valuable COVID-19 information to the public. With this in mind, this study highlights the online social networks of people for COVID-19 across India, Japan, and South Korea.

This study finds some important results as follows: first, countries have different key players for social networks of COVID-19. For example, the Ministry of Health and Prime Minister of India play the most important role in social networks for COVID-19 in the India networks. News media, such as Yahoo! News and NHK news, play the most critical role in social networks of COVID-19 in the Japan networks. The president of South Korea and the Blue House play the most pivotal role in social networks of COVID-19 in the Korea networks.

Second, governmental key players play the most crucial role in South Korea, whereas they play the least crucial role in India. Third, news media play a crucial role in the social networks of India, politicians exert a crucial impact on the social networks of Japan, and the ministries of South Korea have a significant effect on the social networks of South Korea. Fourth, YouTube plays an important role in both Japan and South Korea, whereas it has an insignificant impact on India.

Fifth, most key players are located in large groups in the India networks, key players tend to belong to small groups in the Japan networks, and many key players are concentrated in the largest group in the South Korea networks. Sixth, people are most interested in COVID-19 deaths in India in India’s networks; people care about how Japan manages the information of COVID-19 patients in Japan’s networks; and people focus on South Korea successfully securing COVID-19 vaccines in South Korea’s networks.

References

Anderson, RM, Heesterbeek, H, Klinkenberg, D, et al. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?. Lancet. 2020;395(10228):931934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedford, J, Enria, D, Giesecke, J, et al. COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. Lancet. 2020; 395(10229),10151018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, E, Du, H, Gardner, L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, M, Pullano, G, Pinotti, F, et al. Preparedness and vulnerability of African countries against importations of COVID-19: a modelling study. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):871877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopman, J, Allegranzi, B, Mehtar, S. Managing COVID-19 in low-and middle-income countries. Jama. 2020;323(16):15491550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, Z, Xu, X, Wu, Y, et al. Serial interval of COVID-19 among publicly reported confirmed cases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(6):13411343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, J, Gu, J, Li, K, et al. COVID-19 outbreak associated with air conditioning in restaurant, Guangzhou, China, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(7):16281631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poyiadji, N, Shahin, G, Noujaim, D, et al. COVID-19-associated acute hemorrhagic necrotizing encephalopathy: CT and MRI features. Radiology. 2020;201187201187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raifman, MA, Raifman, JR Disparities in the population at risk of severe illness from covid-19 by race/ethnicity and income. Am J Prev Med. 2020;59(1):137139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Z, McGoogan, JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Jama. 2020;323(13):12391242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adhikari, SP, Meng, S, Wu, YJ, et al. Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak period: a scoping review. Infect Dis Pov. 2020;9(1):112.Google ScholarPubMed
Fang, L, Karakiulakis, G, Roth, M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?. Lancet Resp Med. 2020;8(4):11.Google ScholarPubMed
Mehta, P, McAuley, DF, Brown, M, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):10331034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velavan, TP, Meyer, CG. The COVID‐19 epidemic. Trop Med Int Health. 2020;25(3):278280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, F, Yu, T, Du, R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):10541062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Courtemanche, C, Garuccio, J, Le, A, et al. Strong social distancing measures in the United States reduced the COVID-19 growth rate: study evaluates the impact of social distancing measures on the growth rate of confirmed COVID-19 cases across the United States. Health Affairs. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covid, CDC, Team, R. Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(12):343346.Google Scholar
Clements, JM. Knowledge and behaviors toward COVID-19 among US residents during the early days of the pandemic: cross-sectional online questionnaire. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e19161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flaxman, S, Mishra, S, Gandy, A, et al. Report 13: estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in 11 European countries. Imperial College London; 2020.Google Scholar
Lechien, JR, Chiesa-Estomba, CM, De Siati, DR, et al. Olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions as a clinical presentation of mild-to-moderate forms of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a multicenter European study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;111.Google Scholar
Valdez, D, Ten Thij, M, Bathina, K, et al. Social media insights into US mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analysis of Twitter data. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(12):111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancet, T. India under COVID-19 lockdown. Lancet. 2020;395(10233):1315. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30938-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayasaki, E. Covid-19: how Japan squandered its early jump on the pandemic. Bmj. 2020;369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S, Choi, GJ, Ko, H. Information technology–based tracing strategy in response to COVID-19 in South Korea—privacy controversies. Jama. 2020;323(21):21292130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W, Wang, Y, Yang, L, et al. Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 Outbreak. J Risk Financial Manag. 2020;13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Her, M. How is COVID-19 affecting South Korea? What is our current strategy?. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020;13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, K, Khajanchi, S, Nieto, JJ. Modeling and forecasting the COVID-19 pandemic in India. Chaos Soliton Frac. 2020;110049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, M. The COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Surg Today. 2020;50:787793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Budhwani, H, Sun, R. Creating COVID-19 stigma by referencing the novel coronavirus as the “Chinese virus” on Twitter: quantitative analysis of social media data. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masciantonio, A, Bourguignon, D, Bouchat, P, et al. Don’t put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS One. 2021;16(3):114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muric, G, Wu, Y, Ferrara, E. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on social media: building a public Twitter data set of antivaccine content, vaccine misinformation, and conspiracies. JMIR Pub Health Surveill. 2021;7(11):113.Google ScholarPubMed
Gallotti, R, Valle, F, Castaldo, N, et al. Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to COVID-19 epidemics. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(12):12851293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kusuma, IY, Pratiwi, H, Khairunnisa, SF, et al. The assessment of Twitter discourse on the new COVID-19 variant, XBB. 1.5, through social network analysis. Vaccine: X. 20203; 14:17.Google Scholar
Mellado, C, Hallin, D, Cárcamo, L, et al. Sourcing pandemic news: a cross-national computational analysis of mainstream media coverage of COVID-19 on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Digit Journal. 2021;9(9):12611285.Google Scholar
Nia, ZM, Ahmadi, A, Bragazzi, NL, et al. A cross-country analysis of macroeconomic responses to COVID-19 pandemic using Twitter sentiments. Plos One. 2022;17(8):116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perlstein, SG, Lockdowns, Verboord M., lethality, and laissez-faire politics. Public discourses on political authorities in high-trust countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS One. 2021;16(6):123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yum, S. (2022). Different characteristics of social networks for COVID-19 in Europe. Eur Rev. 2022;30(6):749772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascual-Ferrá, P, Alperstein, N, Barnett, DJ. Social network analysis of COVID-19 public discourse on Twitter: implications for risk communication. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022;16(2):561569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, DH. The multifaceted impact of social media on risk, behavior, and negative emotions during the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea. Asian J Commun. 2021;31(5):337354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puriwat, W, Tripopsakul, S. Customer engagement with digital social responsibility in social media: a case study of COVID-19 situation in Thailand. J Asian Finance Econ Bus. 2021;8(2):475483.Google Scholar
Macarrón Máñez, MT, Moreno Cano, A, Díez, F. Impact of fake news on social networks during COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Young Consumers. 2024;25(4):439461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. A librarian’s guide to graphs, data and the semantic web. Elsevier; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Völker, B. Networks in lockdown: the consequences of COVID-19 for social relationships and feelings of loneliness. Social Networks. 2023;72:112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ennett, ST, Bauman, KE. Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: a social network analysis. J Health Soc Behav. 1993;226236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawe, P, Webster, C, Shiell, A. A glossary of terms for navigating the field of social network analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(12):971975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoppe, B, Reinelt, C. Social network analysis and the evaluation of leadership networks. Leadersh Q. 2010;21(4):600619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacs, B, Caplan, N, Grob, S, et al. Social networks and loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius. 2021;7:116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. (2011). Social network analysis: developments, advances, and prospects. Soc Netw Anal. 2011;1(1):2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohar, D, Tenne-Gazit, O. Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: a social network analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(4):744757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alotaibi, S, Mehmood, R, Katib, I. The Role of Big Data and Twitter Data Analytics in Healthcare Supply Chain Management. Springer; 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, Y, Chatterjee, N. Sentiment analysis of Twitter feeds. In International Conference on Big Data Analytics. Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
Quercia, D, Kosinski, M, Stillwell, D, et al. Our twitter profiles, our selves: predicting personality with twitter. In 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing. 2011;180185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadranjiaghdam, B, Yasrobi, S, Tabrizi, N. Developing a real-time data analytics framework for twitter streaming data. In 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress). 2017;329336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woo, H, Cho, H.S, Shim, E., et al. Identification of keywords from twitter and web blog posts to detect influenza epidemics in Korea. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018;12(3):352359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biddix, JP, Park, H, Collom, GD, et al. Discourse about higher education on Twitter in early phases of COVID-19: a crisis management social network analysis. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28(8):99579983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagals, D, Van der Walt, MS. Exploiting metacognitive networks embedded in narrative focus group interviews using NodeXL. Qual Rep. 2016;21(10):18681880.Google Scholar
Barthelemy, M. Betweenness centrality in large complex networks. Eur Phys J B. 2004;38(2):163168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J Math Sociol. 2001;25(2):163177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, ME. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Soc Netw. 2005;27(1):3954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen-mei, WH. GPU Computing Gems Jade Edition. Elsevier; 2011.Google Scholar
Golbeck, J. Introduction to Social Media Investigation: A Hands-on Approach. Syngress; 2015.Google Scholar
Holland, PW, Leinhardt, S. Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comparative Group Studies. 1971;2(2):107124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, DJ, Strogatz, SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature. 1998;393(6684):440442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yen, CJ, Bozkurt, A, Tu, CH, et al. A predictive study of students’ self-regulated learning skills and their roles in the social network interaction of online discussion board. J Educ Technol Dev Exch. 2019;11(1):128.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, C, Özsezer, G, Pay, M, et al. Web search behaviors and infodemic attitudes regarding COVID-19 in Turkey: a framework study for improving response and informing policy on the COVID-19 infodemic. Front Public Health. 2022;10:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mermer, G, Özsezer, G. Discussions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter in Turkey: sentiment analysis. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023;17:18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauset, A, Newman, ME, Moore, C. Finding community structure in very large networks. Phys Rev E. 2004;70(6):066111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Udanor, C, Aneke, S, Ogbuokiri, BO. Determining social media impact on the politics of developing countries using social network analytics. Program. 2016;50(4):130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You, J. Lessons from South Korea’s Covid-19 policy response. Am Rev Public Admin. 2020;50(6-7):801808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of India. Languagebr. Published February 21, 2022. Accessed December 23, 2022. https://www.education.gov.in/hi/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/upload_document/languagebr.pdfGoogle Scholar
Grover, S, Sahoo, S, Mehra, A, et al. Psychological impact of COVID-19 lockdown: an online survey from India. Indian J Psychiatr. 2020;62(4):354362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jhunjhunwala, A. Role of telecom network to manage COVID-19 in India: Aarogya Setu. Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering. 2020;5(2):157161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raman, R, Rajalakshmi, R, Surya, J, et al. Impact on health and provision of health care services during the COVID-19 lockdown in India: a multicentre cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(1):111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krauss, ES. Broadcasting Politics in Japan: NHK and Television News. Cornell University Press; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, M, Shimoura, K, Nagai-Tanima, M, et al. The relationship between information sources, health literacy, and COVID-19 knowledge in the COVID-19 infodemic: cross-sectional online study in Japan. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(7):e38332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CNN. South Korea’s President Says He’s a Feminist. Three of His Allies Have Been Accused of Sex Crimes. Published July 16, 2020. Accessed December 26, 2022. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/07/15/asia/seoul-mayor-accuser-harassment-intl-hnk/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Han, JHJ. Out of place in time: queer discontents and Sigisangjo. J Asian Studies. 2022;81(1):119129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, DOD, Curran, NM, Kim, HTC. Digital feminism and affective splintering: South Korean Twitter discourse on 500 Yemeni refugees. Int J Commun. 2020;14:19.Google Scholar
Kim, HM, Chang, J.Sexuality and public politics”: temporality of the #MeToo Movement in contemporary South Korea. Azalea: Journal of Korean Literature & Culture. 2021;14(14):243260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czymara, CS, Langenkamp, A, Cano, T. Cause for concerns: gender inequality in experiencing the COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. European Societies. 2021;23:S68S81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, CE, De Jager, CA, Ahmadi-Abhari, S, et al. Associations of social isolation with anxiety and depression during the early COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of older adults in London, UK. Front Psychiatr. 2020;11:591120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, C, Xu, S, Li, Z, et al. Understanding concerns, sentiments, and disparities among population groups during the COVID-19 pandemic via Twitter data mining: large-scale cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e26482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kausar, MA, Soosaimanickam, A, Nasar, M. (2021). Public sentiment analysis on Twitter data during COVID-19 outbreak. Int J Adv Comp Sci App. 2021; 12(2). Khan I, Naqvi SK, Alam M, et al. A Framework for Twitter Data Analysis. Springer; 2018.Google Scholar
Benke, C, Autenrieth, LK, Asselmann, E, et al. Lockdown, quarantine measures, and social distancing: associations with depression, anxiety and distress at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic among adults from Germany. Psychiatr Res. 2020;293:113462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavus, N, Sani, AS, Haruna, Y, et al. Efficacy of social networking sites for sustainable education in the era of COVID-19: a systematic review. Sustainability. 2021;13(2):808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, T, Kumar, A, Upadhyay, P, et al. Link between social distancing, cognitive dissonance, and social networking site usage intensity: a country-level study during the COVID-19 outbreak. Internet Res. 2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Domenico, L, Pullano, G, Sabbatini, CE, et al. Impact of lockdown on COVID-19 epidemic in Île-de-France and possible exit strategies. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litt, DM, Rodriguez, LM, Stewart, SH. Examining associations between social networking site alcohol-specific social norms, posting behavior, and drinking to cope during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021;24(11):715721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonergan, M, Chalmers, JD. Estimates of the ongoing need for social distancing and control measures post-“lockdown” from trajectories of COVID-19 cases and mortality. Eur Resp J. 2020;56(1):110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benítez-Andrades, JA, Fernández-Villa, T, Benavides, C, et al. A case study of university student networks and the COVID-19 pandemic using a social network analysis approach in halls of residence. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durmaz, N, Hengirmen, E. The dramatic increase in anti-vaccine discourses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a social network analysis of Twitter. Hum Vacc Immunother. 2022;18(1):2025008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunmoo, YOON, Odlum, M, Broadwell, P, et al. Application of social network analysis of COVID-19 related tweets mentioning cannabis and opioids to gain insights for drug abuse research. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022;272:58.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Between centrality.Note. The label is explained in Tables 2–4.

Figure 1

Table 1. Descriptive statistics

Figure 2

Figure 2. The clustering coefficient.

Figure 3

Table 2. The top 20 key players in India

Figure 4

Table 3. The top 20 key players in Japan

Figure 5

Figure 3. Reciprocated vertex pair ratio.

Figure 6

Table 4. The top 20 key players in South Korea

Figure 7

Figure 4. Social networks for the typical case.

Figure 8

Figure 5. Social networks according to groups.

Figure 9

Table 5. The top URLs

Figure 10

Table 6. The different results among India, Japan, and Korea