Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Working Through Disaster: Re-establishing Mental Health Care After Hurricane Katrina

  • Natalie D. Baker (a1), Martha S. Feldman (a1) (a2) and Victoria Lowerson (a1)

Abstract

Objective

Our research explored how mental health care providers continued to work during and after Hurricane Katrina.

Methods

We interviewed 32 practitioners working in the New Orleans mental health care community during and after Hurricane Katrina. Through qualitative data analysis, we developed three temporal periods of disruption: the evacuation period, the surreal period, and the new normal period. We analyzed the actions informants took during these time periods.

Results

The mental health care providers adapted to disruption by displaying two forms of flexibility: doing different tasks and doing tasks differently. How much and how they engaged in these forms of flexibility varied during the three periods.

Conclusions

Informants’ actions helped to create system resilience by adjusting the extent to which they were doing different tasks and the ways in which they were doing tasks differently during the three time periods. Their flexibility allowed them to provide basic care and adapt to changed circumstances. Their flexibility also contributed to maintaining a skilled workforce in the affected region. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2013;7:222-231)

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Martha S. Feldman, PhD, 226G Social Ecology 1, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-7075. (e-mail feldmanm@uci.edu).

References

Hide All
1.Carr, L. Disaster and the sequence-pattern concept of social change. AJS. 1932;38:207-218.
2.Stoddard, ER. Conceptual Models of Human Behavior in Disaster. El Paso, Texas: Western Press; 1968.
3.Barton, AH. Communities in Disaster: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Book; 1970.
4.Dynes, RR. Organized Behavior in Disaster. Lexington, Massachusetts: Heath Lexington Books; 1970.
5.Quarantelli, EL. Sheltering and Housing after Major Community Disasters: Case Studies and General Observations. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University; 1982.
6.Haas, JE, Kates, R, Bowden, MJ. Reconstruction Following Disaster. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 1977.
7.Hogg, SJ. Reconstruction following seismic disaster in Venzone, Friuli. Disasters. 1980;4(2):173-185.
8.Kroll-Smith, J, Couch, S. What is a disaster? Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1991;9(3):355-366.
9.Phillips, BD. Post-Disaster Sheltering and Housing of Hispanics, the Elderly, and the Homeless. Final Project Report to the National Science Foundation. Dallas, Texas: Southern Methodist University, Department of Sociology; 1991.
10.Quarantelli, EL. Disaster studies: the consequences of the historical use of a sociological approach in the development of research. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1994;12(1):25-50.
11.Neal, D. Reconsidering the phases of disaster. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 1997;15(2):239-264.
12.Bolin, R. Long-Term Family Recovery from Disaster. Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado; 1982. Program on Environment and Behavior, Institute of Behavioral Science, No. 36.
13.National Research Council of the National Academies. Committee on Disaster Research in the Social Sciences: Future Challenges and Opportunities. Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
14.Sutcliffe, KM, Vogus, T. Organizing for resilience. In: Cameron KS, Dut-ton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship. San Francisco, California: Berrett-Koehler; 2003:94-110.
15.Wildavsky, A. Search for Safety. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers; 1991.
16.Weick, KE, Sutcliffe, KM. Managing the Unexpected: Resilient Performance in an Age of Uncertainty, 2nd ed. San Francisco, California: John Wiley and Sons; 2007.
17.Vogus, TJ, Sutcliffe, KM. Organizational Resilience: Towards a Theory and a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Systems, Man, and Cybernetics October 7-10, 2007. Montreal, Canada; 2007:3418-3422.
18.Kendra, JM, Wachtendorf, T. Elements of resilience after the World Trade Center disaster: reconstituting New York City's Emergency Operations Centre. Disasters. 2003;27(1):37-53.
19.Bigley, G, Roberts, K. The Incident Command System: high-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad Manage J. 2001;44(6):1282-1299.
20.Weick, KE. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Adm Sci Q. 1993;38(4):628-652.
21.Weick, KE, Sutcliffe, KW, Obstfeld, D. Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. In: Sutton R, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol 21. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press; 1999:81-124.
22.Frankl, VE. Man's Search for Meaning. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press; 1962.
23.Coutu, DL. How resilience works. Harv Bus Rev. 2002;80(5):46-50, 52, 55 passim.
24.Maddi, SR. Hardiness: The courage to grow from stresses. J Posit Psychol. 2006;1(3):160-168.
25.Glaser, B, Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, Illinois: Aldine; 1967.
26.Griffies, WS. Health care infrastructure post-Katrina: disaster planning to return health care workers to their home communities. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(1):70-73.
27.Holstein, JA, Gubrium, JF. The Active Interview. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 1995.
28.Lofland, J, Snow, D, Anderson, L, Lofland, L. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 4th ed. Belmont, California: Wads-worth/Thompson Learning; 2006.
29.Corbin, J, Strauss, A. Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc; 2008.
30.Guba, EG, Lincoln, YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 1995:313-371.
31.Charmaz, K. Grounded theory. In: Emerson RM, ed. Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, 2nd ed. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press; 2001:235-252.
32.Emerson, R, Fretz, R, Shaw, L. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Processing Field-notes: Coding and Memoing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995.
33.Kendra, J, Wachtendorf, T. Creativity in Emergency Response to the World Trade Disaster. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center Preliminary Paper. 2002; 324:122-146. http://dspace.udel.edu:8080/dspace/handle/19716/733. Accessed May 7, 2010.
34.Mills, J, Weatherbee, T. Hurricanes hardly happen: sensemaking as a framework for understanding organizational disasters. Cult Organ. 2006;12(3):265-279.
35.Palen, L, Liu, S. Citizen communication in crisis: anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. In: Proceedings of the Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction conference on human factors in computing systems. Emergency Action Session April 28-May 3, 2007; San Jose, California.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
  • ISSN: 1935-7893
  • EISSN: 1938-744X
  • URL: /core/journals/disaster-medicine-and-public-health-preparedness
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed