Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-p56h2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-06T05:50:03.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTERSECTIONALITY UNDONE

Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2014

Sirma Bilge*
Affiliation:
Département de sociologie, Université de Montréal
*
Sirma Bilge, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succursale Centre-ville, H3C 3J7 Montreal (Qc)Canada. E-mail: sirma.bilge@umontreal.ca

Abstract

This article identifies a set of power relations within contemporary feminist academic debates on intersectionality that work to “depoliticizing intersectionality,” neutralizing the critical potential of intersectionality for social justice-oriented change. At a time when intersectionality has received unprecedented international acclaim within feminist academic circles, a specifically disciplinary academic feminism in tune with the neoliberal knowledge economy engages in argumentative practices that reframe and undermine it. This article analyzes several specific trends in debate that neutralize the political potential of intersectionality, such as confining intersectionality to an academic exercise of metatheoretical contemplation, as well as “whitening intersectionality” through claims that intersectionality is “the brainchild of feminism” and requires a reformulated “broader genealogy of intersectionality.”

Information

Type
Intersectionality
Copyright
Copyright © W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable