Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-2bgxn Total loading time: 0.274 Render date: 2022-12-04T05:15:00.766Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true
  • English
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

Article contents

POLITICAL INCORPORATION AND CRITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF BLACK PUBLIC OPINION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2004

Katherine Tate
Katherine Tate
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, Irvine
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The 2000 presidential election was unprecedented not only because of the lengthy dispute over the results, but also because both the Republican and Democratic Party presidential candidates directed their campaign appeals to minority voters. Because Black public opinion has moderated over time, Blacks are closer ideologically to the Democratic and Republican parties. Whereas in the 1970s and early 1980s Blacks believed the Democratic Party to be to the right of their position on issues such as government aid to Blacks and minority groups, today they see little difference, placing the Democratic Party slightly to the left of themselves on average. Black attitudes have moderated, I argue, because of the coercive dynamic of their incorporation into mainstream, electoral politics. And, indeed, the greatest force behind the newfound unity between Blacks and the Democratic Party is, ironically, the exogenous expansion of Black members' opportunities for political power and advancement in the United States House of Representatives. However, in contrast to other structural accounts, my analysis still leaves open the possibility that Black opinion could re-radicalize in the future.Note: Earlier versions of this paper were presented at a May 2003 conference on “New Perspectives on the Study of Race and Political Representation” at the University of Rochester organized by Fredrick C. Harris and Valeria Sinclair-Chapman, and at the 2002 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association meeting in Boston. The author thanks the participants at these events and Emory Denise Christian for their comments, and UCI's Center for the Study of Democracy for its financial support.

Keywords

Black Public OpinionPolitical IncorporationRaceUnited States Congress
Type
STATE OF THE ART
Information
Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , September 2004 , pp. 345 - 359
Copyright
© 2004 W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alverez, R. Michael and John Brehm (2002). Hard Choices, Easy Answers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Barker, Lucius J., Mack Jones, and Katherine Tate (1999). African Americans and American Political System, 4th Ed. New York: Prentice Hall.
Browning, Rufus P., Dale Rogers Marshall, and David H. Tabb (1984). Protest is Not Enough. Los Angeles and Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Clay, William L. (1992). Just Permanent Interests: Black Americans in Congress, 1870–1991. New York: Amistad Press.
Dawson, Michael C. (2001). Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African-American Political Ideologies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson (2002). Public opinion and policy: Causal flow in a macro system model.” In Jeff Manza, Fay Lomax Cook, and Benjamin I. Page (Eds.), Navigating Public Opinion, Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frymer, Paul (1999). Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hamilton, Charles V. (1991). Adam Clayton Powell, Jr.: The Political Biography of an American Dilemma. New York : Atheneum.
Harris-Lacewell, Melissa (2004). Barbershops, Bibles, and BET : Everyday Talk and Black Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hibbing, John R. and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse (1995). Congress as Public Enemy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Huckfeldt, Robert and Carol Weitzel Kohfeld (1989). Race and the Decline of Class in American Politics. Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Hutchings, Vincent L. (2003). Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability: How Citizens Learn about Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lee, Taeku (2002). Mobilizing Public Opinion: Black Insurgency and Racial Attitudes in the Civil Rights Era. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mayhew, David R. (2000). America's Congress: Action in the Public Sphere, James Madison through Newt Gingrich. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Mendelberg, Tali (2001). The Race Card, Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Michels, Robert (1925). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Michels, Robert (1958). Political Parties. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Neustadt, Richard E. (1990). Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: The Free Press.
Page, Benjamin I. and Robert Y. Shapiro (1992). The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Pinderhughes, Dianne (1986). Political choices: A realignment in partisanship among Black voters? In The State of Black America. New York: National Urban League.
Piven, Frances Fox and Richard A. Cloward (1977). Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Pantheon Press.
Rohde, David W. (1991). Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Sapiro, Virginia, Steven J. Rosenstone, and the National Election Studies (2002). AMERICAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIES CUMULATIVE DATA FILE, 1948–2000 (Computer file). 11th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university consortium for Political and Social Research.
Shefter, Martin (1994). Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sinclair, Barbara (1983). Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Singh, Robert (1998). The Congressional Black Caucus: Racial Politics in the U.S. Congress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Skowronek, Stephen (1993). The Politics Presidents Make, Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Smith, Robert C. (1981) Black power and the transformation from protest to politics. Political Science Quarterly, 96: 431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, Carol M. (1993). Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tate, Katherine (1994). From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections, Enlarged Ed. New York and Cambridge, MA: the Russell Sage Foundation and Harvard University Press.
Tate, Katherine (2003). Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Walters, Ronald W. (1988). Black Presidential Politics in America: A Strategic Approach. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

POLITICAL INCORPORATION AND CRITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF BLACK PUBLIC OPINION
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

POLITICAL INCORPORATION AND CRITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF BLACK PUBLIC OPINION
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

POLITICAL INCORPORATION AND CRITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF BLACK PUBLIC OPINION
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *