Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Sargiacomo, Massimo Ianni, Luca and Everett, Jeff 2014. Accounting for suffering: Calculative practices in the field of disaster relief. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 25, Issue. 7, p. 652.

    Johnson, James 2012. Aggregates Unseen: Imagining Post-Katrina New Orleans. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 10, Issue. 03, p. 659.

    Chamlee-Wright, Emily and Storr, Virgil Henry 2010. Expectations of government’s response to disaster. Public Choice, Vol. 144, Issue. 1-2, p. 253.

    Miller, Lisa L. 2010. The Invisible Black Victim: How American Federalism Perpetuates Racial Inequality in Criminal Justice. Law & Society Review, Vol. 44, Issue. 3-4, p. 805.

    Murakawa, Naomi and Beckett, Katherine 2010. The Penology of Racial Innocence: The Erasure of Racism in the Study and Practice of Punishment. Law & Society Review, Vol. 44, Issue. 3-4, p. 695.

    Block, Walter and D'Amico, Daniel J. 2008. Who's to blame for all the heartache?. International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 35, Issue. 8, p. 590.

    Harris-Lacewell, Melissa 2008. Seeking Higher Ground.

  • Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, Volume 3, Issue 1
  • March 2006, pp. 37-57

NEW ORLEANS IS NOT THE EXCEPTION: Re-politicizing the Study of Racial Inequality

  • Paul Frymer (a1), Dara Z. Strolovitch (a2) and Dorian T. Warren (a3)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2006

Although political science provides many useful tools for analyzing the effects of natural and social catastrophes such as Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath, the scenes of devastation and inequality in New Orleans suggest an urgent need to adjust our lenses and reorient our research in ways that will help us to uncover and unpack the roots of this national travesty. Treated merely as exceptions to the “normal” functioning of society, dramatic events such as Katrina ought instead to serve as crucial reminders to scholars and the public that the quest for racial equality is only a work in progress. New Orleans, we argue, was not exceptional; it was the product of broader and very typical elements of American democracy—its ideology, attitudes, and institutions. At the dawn of the century after “the century of the color-line,” the hurricane and its aftermath highlight salient features of inequality in the United States that demand broader inquiry and that should be incorporated into the analytic frameworks through which American politics is commonly studied and understood. To this end, we suggest several ways in which the study of racial and other forms of inequality might inform the study of U.S. politics writ large, as well as offer a few ideas about ways in which the study of race might be re-politicized. To bring race back into the study of politics, we argue for greater attention to the ways that race intersects with other forms of inequality, greater attention to political institutions as they embody and reproduce these inequalities, and a return to the study of power, particularly its role in the maintenance of ascriptive hierarchies.

Corresponding author
Professor Paul Frymer, Department of Politics, University of California Santa Cruz, 222 Crown College, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064. E-mail:
Hide All
Thanks go to Regina Kunzel and Sarah Walker.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
  • ISSN: 1742-058X
  • EISSN: 1742-0598
  • URL: /core/journals/du-bois-review-social-science-research-on-race
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *