Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ssw5r Total loading time: 0.247 Render date: 2022-08-09T23:18:06.508Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The Process of Appointment of Bishops in the Church of England: A Historical and Legal Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2017

Stephen Coleman*
Affiliation:
Assistant Curate, St Paul, Winchmore Hill, London

Extract

‘The manner of appointment [of bishops] reflects the delicate balance between the established nature of the Church of England and its autonomous self-governance.’ As with most matters of Church of England ecclesiology and polity, the process of the appointment of bishops in the Church of England is firmly rooted within the reforms of the sixteenth century, but has origins which stretch back to the mediaeval Church. This comment article focuses on the appointment of diocesan bishops in the Church of England.

Type
Comment
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hill, M, Ecclesiastical Law (third edition, Oxford 2007), p 145Google Scholar.

2 The appointment of suffragan bishops follows a different process.

3 Canon C 1(1).

4 Doe, N, The Legal Framework of the Church of England (Oxford, 1996), p 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Canon C 1(2).

6 See MacCulloch, D, Later Reformation in England (second edition, London, 2000), p 61Google Scholar.

7 Ibid , p 78.

8 Doe, Legal Framework, p 161.

9 Episcopal Ministry: the report of the Archbishop's Group on the Episcopate, GS 944 (London, 1990), p 222Google Scholar.

11 Appointment of Bishops Act 1533, s 3.

12 Episcopal Ministry, p 222.

13 Doe, N, Canon Law in the Anglican Communion (Oxford, 1998), p 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 See further The Principles of Canon Law Common to the Churches of the Anglican Communion (2008) (hereafter ‘PCLCCAC’), available at <www.anglicancommunion.org/media/124862/AC-Principles-of-Canon-Law.pdf>, accessed 7 February 2017.

15 Doe, Canon Law in the Anglican Communion, p 109 and n 32.

16 PCLCCAC, Principle 36(1).

17 PCLCCAC, Principle 36(3).

18 Doe, Canon Law in the Anglican Communion, p 110, n 42.

19 PCLCCAC, Principle 35(4).

20 Ibid , Principle 35(6).

21 Doe, Legal Framework, p 163.

22 See further Vacancy in See Committees Regulations 1993, as amended 2003, 2007 and 2008.

23 See The Governance of Britain, Green Paper, Cmnd 7170 (2007) paras 57–66.

24 Appointment of Bishops Act 1533, s 3; Hill, Ecclesiastical Law, p 146.

25 The Cathedrals Measure 1999, s 3.

26 Introduction by the Vicar General to ‘Confirmation of the election of the Right Reverend Peter Hancock as Bishop of Bath and Wells’ (unpublished, 4 March 2014), p 9.

27 Canon C 17(2).

28 Canon C 2(2).

29 Appointment of Bishops Act 1533, s 5. See also Episcopal Ministry, pp 229–230.

30 Palmer, B, High and Mitred (London, 1992), p 4Google Scholar.

31 Ibid , p 5.

32 MacCulloch, D, Tudor Church Militant (London, 1999), p 32Google Scholar.

33 Palmer, High and Mitred, p 6.

35 Ibid , p 2.

36 For occasions in history when this was not respected by the monarch, see ibid, pp 6–7.

37 Senior Church Appointments: the report of the working party established by the Standing Committee of the General Synod of the Church of England, GS 1019 (London, 1992)Google Scholar, appendix V, p 107.

38 Written parliamentary answer of the Prime Minister, James Callaghan MP, 8 June 1976. Senior Church Appointments, pp 107–108.

39 Hill, Ecclesiastical Law, p 145.

41 Written parliamentary answer of the Prime Minister, Mr James Callaghan, 8 June 1976. Senior Church Appointments, p 108.

42 Hill, Ecclesiastical Law, p 145, n 271.

43 Governance of Britain, para 62.

44 Ibid , para 63.

45 House of Commons Library, Standard Note SN/PC/04403, ‘Prime Ministerial involvement in ecclesiastical appointments’, 2008, p 9.

47 [2003] EWHC 1960, (2003) 7 Ecc LJ 369.

48 Blake v Associated Newspapers per Gray J. See Hill, Ecclesiastical Law, p 27, n 171.

49 Ibid , pp 26–27.

50 V Bogdanor, , The Monarchy and the Constitution (Oxford, 1995), p 65Google Scholar.

51 See Marshall, G, Constitutional Conventions: the rules and forms of political accountability (Oxford, 1984), p 4Google Scholar.

52 Doe, Legal Framework, p 166, n 35.

53 Elliot, M, Administrative Law (third edition, Oxford, 2005), pp 116117 Google Scholar.

54 [1920] AC 508. See Elliot, Administrative Law, p 117.

55 Doe, Legal Framework, p 381.

56 Hill, Ecclesiastical Law, p 148.

57 Marshall, Constitutional Conventions, p 216.

58 Turpin, C and Tomkins, A, British Government and the Constitution (seventh edition, Cambridge, 2011), p 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Ibid , pp 193–195.

60 Ibid , p 192.

61 Allan, T, Law, Liberty and Justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism (Oxford, 1993), pp 253–254Google Scholar.

62 Doe, Canon Law in the Anglican Communion, p 109. See also PCLCCAC, Principle 36(1).

63 ‘Briefing for Members of Vacancy in See Committees’, pp 7–8, available at <www.churchofengland.org/media/35871/dbnom3.pdf>, accessed 7 February 2017.

64 Working with the Spirit: choosing diocesan bishops: a review of the operation of the Crown Appointments Commission and related matters, GS 1405 (London, 2001), p 62Google Scholar.

65 I am very grateful to Dr RM Morris of the Constitution Unit of University College London for this observation.

66 Only at the confirmation of election can an objection be made, and then only as to the election being defective as to form or on the grounds that the nominee was not the royal appointee. See Doe, Legal Framework of the Church of England, pp 166–167.

67 Senior Church Appointments, p 24.

68 I am again grateful to Dr Morris for this clarification.

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Process of Appointment of Bishops in the Church of England: A Historical and Legal Critique
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Process of Appointment of Bishops in the Church of England: A Historical and Legal Critique
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Process of Appointment of Bishops in the Church of England: A Historical and Legal Critique
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *