Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-plzwj Total loading time: 0.502 Render date: 2022-05-22T14:30:42.951Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Re St Paul, Woldingham

Southwark Consistory Court: Petchey Ch, 26 June 2012 Telecommunications installation – licence fees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2012

Ruth Arlow*
Affiliation:
Chancellor of the Diocese of Norwich
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Case Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2013

The petition of the team vicar and churchwardens sought a faculty to permit (1) the installation of telecommunications equipment (a mobile phone ‘base station’) in the bell chamber of a church and (2) the team vicar and PCC to enter into a licence agreement with New Edge Telecommunications (Net) Limited (NET) to maintain and operate and use the equipment. The proposed licence agreement was for a period of 20 years with an annual fee of £5,000, which was to be reviewed every five years to reflect the fee payable in the open market. Local opinion was divided on the proposals. A number of objections, including one from the governors of the local primary school, were received. Following Re Emmanuel Church, Bentley [2006] Fam 39, the court would not apply stricter requirements relating to health and safety risks than those of the Government and local planning authorities. The relevant policy in the National Planning Policy Framework was that local planning authorities ‘should not seek … to determine health safeguards if the proposal meets International Commission guidelines for public exposure’. The proposal in the petition met those guidelines. Accordingly, the health concerns that were raised by objectors did not provide a basis for refusing the petition. Objections that the equipment would facilitate the transmission of pornography could not be sustained in the light of Re St Peter and St Paul, Chingford [2007] Fam 67. As to the proposed licence agreement, the chancellor was concerned that NET was effectively a monopoly purchaser of the right to put telecommunications equipment in churches. In practice, the petitioners were not in a position to sell the right to install the equipment to anyone other than NET so that their bargaining power was constrained. The annual fee of £5,000 was near the bottom of the scale in the chancellor's experience but it was the best price that could be achieved in an imperfectly operating market. That being so, the chancellor identified as a matter of concern the adequacy of the way in which market value would be assessed at the five-yearly reviews of the licence fee. The fact that, as a result of provisions in the Telecommunications Code (Schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1984), the equipment might well remain in place beyond the 20-year term of the licence, possibly even without a further faculty, meant that in the future the licence fee payable might become very small in real terms. Accordingly, while the chancellor did envisage granting a faculty as sought, it would not be granted until he had received satisfactory answers to the concern he had raised. [Alexander McGregor]

You have Access

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Re St Paul, Woldingham
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Re St Paul, Woldingham
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Re St Paul, Woldingham
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *