Skip to main content
×
×
Home

CAPABILITY PATERNALISM

  • Rutger Claassen (a1)
Abstract

A capability approach prescribes paternalist government actions to the extent that it requires the promotion of specific functionings, instead of the corresponding capabilities. Capability theorists have argued that their theories do not have much of these paternalist implications, since promoting capabilities will be the rule, promoting functionings the exception. This paper critically surveys that claim. From a close investigation of Nussbaum's statements about these exceptions, it derives a framework of five categories of functionings promotion that are more or less unavoidable in a capability theory. It argues that some of these categories may have an expansionary dynamic; they may give rise to widespread functionings promotion, which would defeat the capabilitarian promise that paternalist interventions will be exceptions to the rule of a focus on capabilities. Finally, the paper discusses three further theoretical issues that will be decisive in holding this paternalist tendency in check: how high one sets threshold levels of capability protection, how lengthy one's list of basic capabilities is, and how one deals with individual responsibility for choices resulting in a loss of one's capabilities.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Anderson, E. 2010. Justifying the capability approach to justice. In Measuring Justice. Primary Goods and Capabilities, ed. Brighouse, H. and Robeyns, I., 81100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, J. and Claassen, R.. 2012. Sailing alone. Teenage autonomy and regimes of childhood. Law and Philosophy 31: 495522.
Arneson, R. 2000. Perfectionism and politics. Ethics 111: 3763.
Arneson, R. 2010. Two cheers for capabilities. In Measuring Justice. Primary Goods and Capabilities, ed. Brighouse, H. and Robeyns, I., 101127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Basu, K. 1987. Achievements, capabilities and the concept of well-being. Social Choice and Welfare 4: 6976.
Carter, I. 2014. Is the capability approach paternalist? Economics and Philosophy 30: 7598.
Claassen, R. 2011. “Making capability lists. Philosophy versus democracy. Political Studies 59: 491508.
Claassen, R. and Düwell, M.. 2013. The foundations of capability theory: comparing Nussbaum and Gewirth. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 493510.
Crocker, D. 2008. Ethics of Global Development. Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deneulin, S. 2002. Perfectionism, paternalism and liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum's capability approach. Review of Political Economy 14: 497518.
Dowding, K. and van Hees, M.. 2007. Counterfactual success and negative freedom. Economics and Philosophy 23: 141162.
Dworkin, G. 1983. Paternalism. In Paternalism, ed. Sartorius, R., 1934. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Dworkin, G. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feinberg, J. 1986. Harm to Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feinberg, J. 1988. Harmless Wrongdoing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fleurbaey, M. 2006. Capabilities, functionings and refined functionings. Journal of Human Development 7: 299310.
Jaggar, A. 2006. Reasoning about well-being: Nussbaum's methods of justifying the capabilities. Journal of Political Philosophy 14: 301322.
Nelson, E. 2008. From primary goods to capabilities: distributive justice and the problem of neutrality. Political Theory 36: 93122.
Nussbaum, M. 1990. Aristotelian social democracy. In Liberalism and the Good, ed. Douglas, R., Mara, G. and Richardson, H., 203252. New York, NY: Routledge.
Nussbaum, M. 1995. Poetic Justice. The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. 2006. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
Okin, S. 2003. Poverty, well-being and gender: what counts, who's heard? Philosophy and Public Affairs 31: 280316.
Olsaretti, S. 2005. Endorsement and freedom in Amartya Sen's Capability Approach. Economics and Philosophy 21: 89108.
Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Robeyns, I. 2009. Equality and justice. In An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach: Freedom and Agency, ed. Deneulin, S. and Shahani, L., 101120. London: Earthscan.
Robeyns, I. 2011. The capability approach. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/.
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. 1993. Capability and well-being. In The Quality of Life, ed. Nussbaum, M. and Sen, A., 3053. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. 2004. Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics 10: 7780.
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C.. 2008. Nudge. Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth & Happiness. London: Penguin Books.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed