Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Thomas Nadelhoffer (a1), Saeideh Heshmati (a2), Deanna Kaplan (a2) and Shaun Nichols (a3)

Retributivist accounts of punishment maintain that it is right to punish wrongdoers, even if the punishment has no future benefits. Research in experimental economics indicates that people are willing to pay to punish defectors. A complementary line of work in social psychology suggests that people think that it is right to punish wrongdoers. This work suggests that people are retributivists about punishment. However, all of the extant work contains an important potential confound. The target of the punishment is expected to be aware of the punitive act. Thus, it's possible that people punish because they want to communicate something to the wrongdoer, e.g. disapproval, the presence of a norm, etc. In three studies, we examine whether people will punish even when the punishee will be ignorant. We find that people are no less likely to punish when the punishee will be ignorant. This finding emerges both in a survey study and in a monetized behavioural decision study.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Andreoni and L. Vesterlund. 2001. Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 293312.

K. M. Carlsmith 2006. The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42: 437451.

K. M. Carlsmith 2008. On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research 21: 119137.

K. M. Carlsmith and J. M. Darley. 2008. Psychological aspects of retributive justice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 40: 193236. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

K. M. Carlsmith , J. M. Darley and P. H. Robinson. 2002. Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 284299.

J. G. Cottingham 1979. Varieties of retributivism. Philosophical Quarterly 29: 238246.

J. M. Darley , K. M. Carlsmith and P. H. Robinson. 2000. Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishment. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 659683.

M. H. Davis 1983. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 113126.

M. Dufwenberg and A. Muren. 2006. Gender composition in teams. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61: 5054.

E. Fehr and S. Gächter. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415: 137140.

E. Fehr and S. Gachter. 2005. Human behaviour: Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment (reply). Nature 433: E1E2.

E. Fehr and U. Fischbacher 2004. Third party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior 25: 6387.

J. Feinberg 1965. The expressive function of punishment. The Monist 49: 397423.

J. Fowler , T. Johnson and O. Smirnov. 2005. Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment. Nature 433: E1.

M. Gollwitzer and M. Denzler. 2009. What makes revenge so sweet: seeing the offender suffer or delivering a message? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45: 840844.

B. Hermann , C. Thoni and S. Gachter. 2008. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319: 13621367.

E. Hoffman , K. McCabe, K. Shachat and V. L. Smith. 1994. Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7: 346380.

D. Kahneman , D. Schkade and C. R. Sunstein. 1998. Shared outrage and erratic awards: the psychology of punitive damages. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16: 4986.

R. M. McFatter 1978. Sentencing strategies and justice: effects of punishment philosophy on sentencing decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 14901500.

R. M. McFatter 1982. Purposes of punishment: effects of utilities of criminal sanctions on perceived appropriateness. Journal of Applied Psychology 67: 255267.

A. E. Monroe and B. F. Malle. 2010. From uncaused will to conscious choice: the need to study, not speculate about, people's folk concept of free will. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1: 34.

E. Nahmias , S. Morris, T. Nadelhoffer and J. Turner. 2006. Is incompatibilism intuitive? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 2853.

S. Nichols 2007. After incompatibilism: a naturalistic defense of the reactive attitudes. Philosophical Perspectives 21: 405428.

S. Nichols and J. Knobe. 2007. Moral responsibility and determinism: the cognitive science of folk intuitions. Nous 41: 663685.

F. Pratto , J. Sidanius, L. M. Stallworth and B. F. Malle. 1994. Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 741763.

N. Vidmar 1974. Retributive and utilitarian motives and other correlates of Canadian attitudes toward the death penalty. Canadian Psychologist 15: 337356.

K. Vohs and J. Schooler. 2008. The value of believing in free will: encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science 19: 4954.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Nadelhoffer et al. supplementary material
Supplementary material

 PDF (116 KB)
116 KB