Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

POLITICAL IDEALS AND THE FEASIBILITY FRONTIER

  • David Wiens (a1)

Abstract:

I present an analysis of feasibility that generalizes the economic concept of a production possibility frontier and develop a model of the feasibility frontier using the familiar possible worlds technology. I then use the model to show that we cannot reasonably expect that adopting political ideals as long-term reform objectives will guide us toward the realization of morally optimal feasible states of affairs. I conclude by proposing that political philosophers turn their attention to the analysis of actual social failures rather than political ideals.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Anderson, E. 2010. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brennan, G. 2007. Economics. In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, ed. Goodin, R. E., Pettit, P. and Pogge, T., 2nd edn, 118152. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Brennan, G. 2013. Feasibility in optimizing ethics. Social Philosophy and Policy 20: 314329.
Brennan, G. and Pettit, P.. 2005. The feasibility issue. In Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, ed. Jackson, F. and Smith, M., 258279. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brennan, G. and Southwood, N.. 2007. Feasibility in action and attitude. In Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz, ed. Rønnow-Rasmussen, T., Petersson, B., Josefsson, J. and Egonsson, D.. Available online at www.fil.lu.se/hommageawlodek.
Buchanan, A. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, G. A. 2008. Rescuing Justice and Equality New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, G. A. 2009. Why Not Socialism? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cowen, T. 2007. The importance of defining the feasible set. Economics and Philosophy 23: 114.
Estlund, D. 2011. Human nature and the limits (if any) of political philosophy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 39: 207237.
Estlund, D. 2014. Utopophobia. Philosophy and Public Affairs 42: 113134.
Gheaus, A. 2013. The feasibility constraint on the concept of justice. Philosophical Quarterly 63: 445464.
Ghosh, P. 2012. Climate change: those creating problems least willing to take action. Interview in ZeeNews.com. February 2012. http://zeenews.india.com/news/exclusive/climate-change-those-creating-problems-least-willing-to-take-action_756232.html.
Gilabert, P. 2012 a. Comparative assessments of justice, political feasibility, and ideal theory. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15: 3956.
Gilabert, P. 2012 b. From Global Poverty to Global Equality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gilabert, P. and Lawford-Smith, H.. 2012. Political feasibility: a conceptual exploration. Political Studies 60: 809825.
Hamlin, A. and Stemplowska, Z.. 2012. Theory, ideal theory and the theory of ideals. Political Studies Review 10: 4862.
James, A. 2012. Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Jubb, R. 2012. Tragedies of non-ideal theory. European Journal of Political Theory 11: 229246.
Knight, J. and Johnson, J.. 2011. The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kratzer, A. 1991. Modality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, ed. von Stechow, A. and Wunderlich, D., 639650. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Lawford-Smith, H. 2013. Understanding political feasibility. Journal of Political Philosophy 21: 243259.
Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals and comparative possibility. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 418446.
Lipsey, R. G. and Lancaster, K.. 1956. The general theory of second best. Review of Economic Studies 24: 1132.
Petroski, H. 2006. Success Through Failure: The Paradox of Design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pogge, T.W. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights, 2nd edn.Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Räikkä, J. 1998. The feasibility condition in political theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 6: 2740.
Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice, 2nd edn.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Robeyns, I. 2008. Ideal theory in theory and practice. Social Theory and Practice 34: 341362.
Sangiovanni, A. 2008. Normative political theory: a flight from reality? In Political Thought and International Relations: Variations on a Realist Theme, ed. Bell, D., 219239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidtz, D. 2011. Nonideal theory: what it is and what it needs to be. Ethics 121: 772796.
Sen, A. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Simmons, A. J. 2010. Ideal and nonideal theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs 38: 536.
Stalnaker, R. C. 1968. A theory of conditionals. In Studies in Logical Theory, ed. Rescher, N., 98112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stemplowska, Z. 2008. What's ideal about ideal theory? Social Theory and Practice 34: 319340.
Usigbe, L. 2012. Continental free trade regime not feasible in 2017 – Jonathan. Nigerian Tribune. 30 January 2012. http://tribune.com.ng/index.php/news/35122-continental-free-trade-regime-not-feasible-in-2017-jonathan.
Valentini, L. 2012 a. Ideal vs. non-ideal theory: a conceptual map. Philosophy Compass 7: 654664.
Valentini, L. 2012 b. Justice in a Globalized World: A Normative Framework. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Wiens, D. 2012. Prescribing institutions without ideal theory. Journal of Political Philosophy 20: 4570.
Wiens, D. 2013. Demands of justice, feasible alternatives, and the need for causal analysis. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16: 325338.
Wiens, D. 2014. Achieving global justice: why failures matter more than ideals. In Making Global Institutions Work: Power, Accountability and Change, ed. Brennan, K., 1732. New York, NY: Routledge.
Wiens, D. 2015. Against ideal guidance. Journal of Politics 77: 433446.
Ypi, L. 2012. Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

POLITICAL IDEALS AND THE FEASIBILITY FRONTIER

  • David Wiens (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.