Skip to main content
×
×
Home

THE POTENTIAL OF NEUROECONOMICS

  • Colin F. Camerer (a1)
Abstract

The goal of neuroeconomics is a mathematical theory of how the brain implements decisions, that is tied to behaviour. This theory is likely to show some decisions for which rational-choice theory is a good approximation (particularly for evolutionarily sculpted or highly learned choices), to provide a deeper level of distinction among competing behavioural alternatives, and to provide empirical inspiration for economics to incorporate more nuanced ideas about endogeneity of preferences, individual difference, emotions, endogeneous regulation of states, and so forth. I also address some concerns about rhetoric and practical epistemology. Neuroscience articles are necessarily speculative and the science has proceeded rapidly because of that rhetorical convention. Single-study papers are encouraged and are necessarily limited in what can be inferred, so the sturdiest cumulation of results, and the best guide forward, comes in review journals which compile results and suggest themes. The potential of neuroeconomics is in combining the clearest experimental paradigms and statistical methods in economics, with the unprecedented capacity to measure a range of neural and cognitive activity that economists like Edgeworth, Fisher and Ramsey daydreamed about but did not have.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Colander D. 2008. Neuroeconomics, the hedonimeter, and utility: some historical links. Journal of Economic Perspectives.
Fox C. and Poldrack R. (in press). Prospect theory in the brain. In Decision neuroscience, ed. Glimcher P., Camerer C., Fehr E. and Poldrack R.. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Grant S. and Polak B.. 2007. Absolute ambiguity aversion: Mean dispersion preferences. Yale working paper.
Glimcher P., Camerer C. F., Fehr E. and Poldrack R.. 2008. Decision neuroscience. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Harrison G. 2008. Neuroeconomics: A critical reconsideration. Economics and Philosophy 24.
Hsu M., Bhatt M., Adolphs R., Tranel D. and Camerer C. F. 2005. Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 310: 1680–3.
List J. 2006. When the behavioralist meets the market. Journal of Political Economy.
Poldrack R. A. & Wagner A. D. 2004. What can neuroimaging tell us about the mind? Insights from prefrontal cortex. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13: 177–81.
Rubinstein A. Comments on neuroeconomics. Economics and Philosophy.
Spiegler R. 2008. Comments on the potential significance of neuroeconomics for economic theory. Economics and Philosophy 24.
Stigler G. 1981. Economics or ethics? In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 2, ed. McMurrin S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 251 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.