Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Felipe, J. and McCombie, J.S.L. 2014. The Aggregate Production Function: ‘Not Even Wrong’. Review of Political Economy, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 60.

    Webb, James L. 2012. Pragmatism(s) Plural, Part II: From Classical Pragmatism to Neo-Pragmatism. Journal of Economic Issues, Issue. 1, p. 45.

    Watkins, John P. 2010. Mainstream Efforts to Tell a Better Story - Natural Selection as a Misplaced Metaphor: The Problem of Corporate Power. Journal of Economic Issues, Issue. 4, p. 991.

    Heinonen, Visa 1993. Economics as the physics of society—an interview with Philip Mirowski. Review of Political Economy, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 508.

    Barnes, Trevor J. 1991. SHALL I COMPARE THEE TO A STRICTLY QUASI-CONCAVE CONTINUOUS UTILITY FUNCTION? OR, HOMO ECONOMICUS, PART TWO‘. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 400.

    Beed, Clive 1991. Philosophy of Science and Contemporary Economics: An Overview. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 459.

    Eberle, W. David and Hayden, F. Gregory 1991. Critique of Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Methods for Valuing Natural Resources and Ecosystems. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 649.

    WHITE, MICHAEL V. 1990. Invention in the Face of Necessity: Marshallian Rhetoric and the Giffen Good(s). Economic Record, Vol. 66, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Berger, Lawrence A. 1989. Economics and Hermeneutics. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 5, Issue. 02, p. 209.

    Berns, E.E. 1989. Value and Time in Menger’s Grundsätze. Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 16, Issue. 2,

    Mirowski, Philip 1989. How not to do things with metaphors: Paul Samuelson and the science of neoclassical economics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 175.

    Mäki, Uskali 1988. How to Combine Rhetoric and Realism in the Methodology of Economics. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 4, Issue. 01, p. 89.

    Ruccio, David F. 1988. The Merchant of Venice, or Marxism in the Mathematical Mode. Rethinking Marxism, Vol. 1, Issue. 4, p. 36.

    Mirowski, Philip 1987. The Philosophical Bases of Institutionalist Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 1001.


Shall I Compare Thee to a Minkowski-Ricardo-Leontief-Metzler Matrix of the Mosak-Hicks Type?: Or, Rhetoric, Mathematics, and the Nature of Neoclassical Economic Theory

  • Philip Mirowski (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 December 2008

Is rhetoric just a new and trendy way to épater les bourgeois? Unfortunately, I think that the newfound interest of some economists in rhetoric, and particularly Donald McCloskey in his new book and subsequent responses to critics (McCloskey, 1985a, 1985b), gives that impression. After economists have worked so hard for the past five decades to learn their sums, differential calculus, real analysis, and topology, it is a fair bet that one could easily hector them about their woeful ignorance of the conjugation of Latin verbs or Aristotle's Six Elements of Tragedy. Moreover, it has certainly become an academic cliché that economists write as gracefully and felicitously as a hundred monkeys chained to broken typewriters. The fact that economists still trot out Keynes's prose in their defense is itself an index of the inarticulate desperation of an inarticulate profession.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B. Barnes , and S. Shapin (editors). 1979. Natural Order. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Randall Bausor . 1986. “Time and Equilibrium.” In The Reconstruction of Economic Theory, edited by P. Mirowski , pp. 93136. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

David Bloor . 1982. “Durkheim and Mauss Revisited.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 13:267–97.

Phyllis Colvin . 1977. “Ontological and Epistemological Commitments in the Social Sciences.” In The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge, edited by E. Mendelsohn , P. Weingart , and R. Whitely , pp. 103–28. Boston: Reidel.

Mary Douglas . 1973. Natural Symbols. London: Barrie and Jenkins.

C. Garner 1979. “Academic Publication, Market Signalling and Scientific Research Decisions.” Econoniic Inquiry 17:575–84.

Stephen Gaukroger . 1976. “Bachelard and the Problem of Epistemological Analysis.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 7:189244.

Sandra Harding (editor). 1976. Can Theories Be Refuted? Boston: Reidel.

Mary Hesse . 1980. Revolutions and Reconstruction in the Philosophy of Science. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Mary Hesse . 1985. “Texts without Types and Lumps without Laws.” New Literary History 17:3148.

Karin Knorr-Cetina . 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. New York: Pergamon.

G. Lakoff , and M. Johnson 1980. “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language.” Journal of Philosophy 77:453–86.

Claude Menard . 1980. “Three Forms of Resistance to Statistics: Say, Cournot, Walras.” History of Political Economy 12:524–41.

Philip Mirowski . 1984b. “The Role of Conservation Principles in 20th Century Economic Theory.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14:461–73.

Philip Mirowski . 1986. “Mathematical Formalism and Economic Explanation.” In The Reconstruction of Economic Theory, edited by P. Mirowski . Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Steven Shapin . 1984. “Talking History: Reflections on Discourse Analysis.” Isis 75:125–28.

Leon Walras . 1960. “Économique et Mécanique.” Metroeconomica 12:313.

Stanley Wong . 1978. The Foundations of Samuelson's Revealed Preference Theory. Boston: Routledge

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *