Skip to main content
×
×
Home

SWEATSHOPS AND CONSUMER CHOICES

  • Benjamin Ferguson (a1) and Florian Ostmann (a2)
Abstract:

We consider a case where consumers are faced with a choice between sweatshop-produced clothing and identical clothing produced in high-income countries. We argue that it is morally better for consumers to purchase clothing produced in sweatshops and then to compensate sweatshop workers for the difference between their actual wage and a fair wage than it is for them either to purchase the sweatshop clothing without this compensatory transfer or to purchase clothing produced in high-income countries.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      SWEATSHOPS AND CONSUMER CHOICES
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      SWEATSHOPS AND CONSUMER CHOICES
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      SWEATSHOPS AND CONSUMER CHOICES
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Ashenfelter, O., Ciccarella, S. and Shatz, H.. 2007. French wine and the U.S. boycott of 2003: does politics really affect commerce? Journal of Wine Economics 2 (1): 5574.
Fashion Revolution. 2016. Fashion Transparency Index. http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/portals/0/downloads/frfashiontransparencyindex.pdf
Ferguson, B. 2016. Exploitation and disadvantage. Economics and Philosophy 32 (3): 485509.
Ferguson, B. 2018. Exploitation and labour. In The Routledge Companion to Business Ethics, ed. Heath, E., Kaldis, B. and Marcoux, A., 490–505. London: Routledge.
Ferguson, B. and Steiner, H.. 2018. Exploitation. In The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice, ed. Olsaretti, S., 533555. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kalai, E. 1977. Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: intertemporal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45 (7): 1623–30.
Kalai, E. and Smorodinsky, M.. 1975. Other solutions to Nash's bargaining problem. Econometrica 43 (3): 513518.
King, B. 2008. A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly 53 (3): 395421.
King, B. 2011. The tactical disruptiveness of social movements: sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Social Problems 58 (4): 491517.
King, B. 2016. Do boycotts work? (Interview.) Freakonomics Podcast, 1 January 2016.
Krugman, P. 2016. In praise of cheap labor. Slate Magazine. <http://www.slate.com/articles/business/thedismalscience/1997/03/inpraiseofcheaplabor.html.>
McDonnell, M. & King, B.. 2013. Keeping up appearances: reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Administrative Science Quarterly 58 (3): 387419.
Nash, J. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18 (2): 155162.
Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R. and van de Kuilen, G. 2004. Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics 7 (2): 171188.
Powell, B. and Zwolinski, M.. 2011. The ethical and economic case against sweatshop labor: a critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 107 (4): 449472.
Reiff, M. 2013. Exploitation and Economic Justice in the Liberal Capitalist State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roemer, J. 1982. A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ross, R. 2004. Slaves to Fashion: Poverty and Abuse in the New Sweatshops. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Sample, R. 2003. Exploitation: What it is and Why it's Wrong. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
Snyder, J. 2008. Needs exploitation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (4): 389405.
Steiner, H. 1984. A liberal theory of exploitation. Ethics 94 (2): 225241.
Steiner, H. 1987. Exploitation: a liberal theory amended, defended and extended. In Modern Theories of Exploitation, ed. Reeve, A., 132148. London: Sage.
Steiner, H. 2010. Exploitation takes time. In Economic Theory and Economic Thought: Essays in Honour of Ian Steedman, ed. Vint, J., Metcalfe, J.S., Kurz, H.D., Salvadori, N. and Samuelson, P., 2029. London: Routledge.
Teoh, S., Welch, I. and Wazzan, C.. 1999. The effect of socially activist investment policies on the financial markets: evidence from the South African boycott. Journal of Business 71 (1): 3589.
Zwolinski, M. 2007. Sweatshops, choice, and exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4): 689727.
Zwolinski, M. and Wertheimer, A.. 2016. Exploitation. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. N.. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/exploitation/>.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed