Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 20
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Atli, Dinçer and Yilmazata, Mehmet 2016. Neuroeconomics and the Decision-Making Process.


    Bissonnette, Jean François 2016. From the moral to the neural: brain scans, decision-making, and the problematization of economic (ir)rationality. Journal of Cultural Economy, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 364.


    Iaione, Christian 2016. The CO-City: Sharing, Collaborating, Cooperating, and Commoning in the City. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 75, Issue. 2, p. 415.


    Colombo, Matteo 2015. For a Few Neurons More: Tractability and Neurally Informed Economic Modelling. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 66, Issue. 4, p. 713.


    Kable, Joseph W and Levy, Ifat 2015. Neural markers of individual differences in decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 5, p. 100.


    2015. Behavioral Computational Social Science.


    Brighetti, Gianni Lucarelli, Caterina and Marinelli, Nicoletta 2014. Do emotions affect insurance demand?. Review of Behavioural Finance, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 136.


    Fumagalli, Roberto 2013. THE FUTILE SEARCH FOR TRUE UTILITY. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 29, Issue. 03, p. 325.


    Birnberg, Jacob G. and Ganguly, Ananda Roop 2012. Is neuroaccounting waiting in the wings? An essay. Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Fumagalli, Roberto 2011. On the neural enrichment of economic models: tractability, trade-offs and multiple levels of description. Biology & Philosophy, Vol. 26, Issue. 5, p. 617.


    Levin, Yakir and Aharon, Itzhak 2011. What’s on Your Mind? A Brain Scan Won’t Tell. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, Vol. 2, Issue. 4, p. 699.


    Powell, Thomas C. 2011. Neurostrategy. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 32, Issue. 13, p. 1484.


    van Rooij, Marieke and Van Orden, Guy 2011. It's about Space, It's about Time, Neuroeconomics and the Brain Sublime. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 31.


    Clark, Gordon L. 2010. HUMAN NATURE, THE ENVIRONMENT, AND BEHAVIOUR: EXPLAINING THE SCOPE AND GEOGRAPHICAL SCALE OF FINANCIAL DECISION-MAKING. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, Vol. 92, Issue. 2, p. 159.


    Clavien, Christine and Klein, Rebekka A. 2010. EAGER FOR FAIRNESS OR FOR REVENGE? PSYCHOLOGICAL ALTRUISM IN ECONOMICS. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 26, Issue. 03, p. 267.


    Davis, John B. 2010. Neuroeconomics: Constructing identity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 76, Issue. 3, p. 574.


    Shogren, Jason F. Parkhurst, Gregory M. and Banerjee, Prasenjit 2010. Two Cheers and a Qualm for Behavioral Environmental Economics. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 46, Issue. 2, p. 235.


    Smith, David V. and Huettel, Scott A. 2010. Decision neuroscience: neuroeconomics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, Vol. 1, Issue. 6, p. 854.


    Vromen, Jack 2010. On the surprising finding that expected utility is literally computed in the brain. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 17.


    Harrison, Glenn W. 2008. NEUROECONOMICS: A REJOINDER. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 24, Issue. 03, p. 533.


    ×

THE POTENTIAL OF NEUROECONOMICS

  • Colin F. Camerer (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266267108002022
  • Published online: 01 November 2008
Abstract

The goal of neuroeconomics is a mathematical theory of how the brain implements decisions, that is tied to behaviour. This theory is likely to show some decisions for which rational-choice theory is a good approximation (particularly for evolutionarily sculpted or highly learned choices), to provide a deeper level of distinction among competing behavioural alternatives, and to provide empirical inspiration for economics to incorporate more nuanced ideas about endogeneity of preferences, individual difference, emotions, endogeneous regulation of states, and so forth. I also address some concerns about rhetoric and practical epistemology. Neuroscience articles are necessarily speculative and the science has proceeded rapidly because of that rhetorical convention. Single-study papers are encouraged and are necessarily limited in what can be inferred, so the sturdiest cumulation of results, and the best guide forward, comes in review journals which compile results and suggest themes. The potential of neuroeconomics is in combining the clearest experimental paradigms and statistical methods in economics, with the unprecedented capacity to measure a range of neural and cognitive activity that economists like Edgeworth, Fisher and Ramsey daydreamed about but did not have.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Hsu , M. Bhatt , R. Adolphs , D. Tranel and C. F. Camerer 2005. Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 310: 1680–3.

R. A. Poldrack & A. D. Wagner 2004. What can neuroimaging tell us about the mind? Insights from prefrontal cortex. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13: 177–81.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Economics & Philosophy
  • ISSN: 0266-2671
  • EISSN: 1474-0028
  • URL: /core/journals/economics-and-philosophy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×