Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion

  • HEINZ J. GIEGERICH (a1)
Abstract

This article argues that English noun-plus-noun constructions (‘NNs’) originate both in the lexicon and in the syntax. It distinguishes between complement–head and attribute–head NNs, as well as between fore-stressed and end-stressed NNs. It argues that complement-head NNs are fore-stressed and originate in the lexicon while attribute–head NNs typically have end-stress and syntactic provenance. The latter are, however, potentially subject to diachronic lexicalization, which may moreover involve the adoption of fore-stress. Hence, lexical NNs may be fore-stressed or end-stressed while phrasal NNs must be end-stressed. Although further potential sources of irregularity are identified, it is demonstrated that the model's predictive power is fairly robust and that, where it fails to predict firm stress patterns, it predicts their variability.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
I am grateful to two anonymous ELL reviewers, as well as to Laurie Bauer, Nik Gisborne, Patrick Honeybone, Tetsu Koshiishi, Donka Minkova, Ingo Plag, and Graeme Trousdale, for their detailed and helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Footnotes
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Language & Linguistics
  • ISSN: 1360-6743
  • EISSN: 1469-4379
  • URL: /core/journals/english-language-and-linguistics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 160 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 559 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.