Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Exploring the ‘shashification’ of teenage slang

  • José Antonio Sánchez Fajardo
Extract

The study of the paradigmatic traits of teenage slang has shown that a sense of togetherness is predominant (Eble, 1996; Allen, 1998; Mattiello, 2005, 2008; Smith, 2011). This cohesive linguistic device is not consciously intended to exclude unwished members from conversations or common understanding, but the idea of relying on a preserved sense of solidarity and acceptance is a human urge, especially among teenagers or young adults (cf. Mattiello, 2005: 13). These features are a necessary starting point to understand that the colloquial nature or social restriction of these words and phrases are precisely aimed to ‘establish or reinforce social identity within a group or with a trend or fashion in society at large’ (Eble, 1996: 11).

Copyright
Corresponding author
References
Hide All
Adger, C. T., Wolfram, W. & Christian, D. 2007. Dialects in Schools and Communities. New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Allen, I. L. 1998. ‘Slang: Sociology.’ In Mey, J. L. & Asher, R. E. (eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 878883.
Ayto, J. 1998. Dictionary of Slang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barnhart, C. L. 1973. ‘Of Matters Lexicographical: Keeping a Record of New English, 1963–1972.’ American Speech, 45, 98107.
Bolinger, D. L. 1950. ‘Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis.’ Word, 6, 117136.
Bolinger, D. L. 1965. Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crystal, D. 2003. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (5th edn.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Eble, C. 1996. Slang and Sociability. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
Gold, D. 1986. ‘An Introduction to Jewish English.’ JLR, 6, 94120.
Hickey, R. 2014. ‘Phonological change in English.’ In Kytö, M. & Pahta, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jakobson, R. 1960. ‘Linguistics and poetics.’ In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
McCumber, V. 2010. ‘–s: The latest slang suffix: for reals.’ Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria, 20, 124130.
Maddieson, I. 1984. Patterns of Sounds. With a Chapter Contributed by Sandra Ferrari Disner. (Cambridge Studies in Speech Science and Communication). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Markel, N. N. & Hamp, E. P. 1960. ‘Connotative meanings of certain phoneme sequences.’ Studies in Linguisics, 15, 4761.
Mattiello, E. 2005. ‘The pervasiveness of slang in standard and non-standard English.’ Mots Palabras Words, 6, 741.
Mattiello, E. 2008. An Introduction to English Slang. A Description of its Morphology, Semantics and Sociology. Milan: Polimetrica.
Nash, W. 1993. Jargon. Its Uses and Abuses. Oxford/Cambridge U.S.A.: Blackwell.
NOW: Davies, M. 2018. News on the Web Corpus. Online at <https://corpus.byu.edu/now/> (Accessed January 15, 2018).
OED3: Oxford English Dictionary Online (3rd edn.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com> (Accessed 14 March 2017).
Partridge, E. 1984. A Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English. London/New York: Routledge.
Rennison, L. 2005. ‘ . . . And That's When It Fell off in My Hand’. London: Harper Collins.
Smith, R. 2011. ‘Urban dictionary: Youth slanguage and the redefining of definition: What's up with meep and other words in the Urban Dictionary.English Today, 27(4), 4348
Spears, R. A. 2000. Dictionary of American Slang and Colloquial Expressions. NTC's Publishing Group.
Thorne, T. 2005. Dictionary of Contemporary English. London: A&C Black Publishers.
Wales, K. 1990. ‘Phonotactics and phonoæsthesia: The power of folk lexicology.’ In Ramsaran, S. (ed.), Studies in the Pronunciation of English. A Commemorative Volume in Honour of A.C. Gimson. London: Routledge, pp. 339351.
Wescott, R. W. 1978. ‘Zazzification in American Slang.Forum Linguisticum, 3(2), 185187.
Yorkston, E. & Menon, G. 2004. ‘A sound idea: Phonetics effects of brand names on consumer judgements.’ Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 4351.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

English Today
  • ISSN: 0266-0784
  • EISSN: 1474-0567
  • URL: /core/journals/english-today
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed