Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:16:53.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Grand Tour of English Grammatical Constructions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2015

Jacqueline Laws
Jacqueline Laws*
Affiliation:
University of Reading
*
Email: j.v.laws@reading.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This introductory text successfully achieves its ambitious goal of demonstrating how the Construction Grammar framework can be applied in a systematic fashion to a range of sub-disciplines within Linguistics. Construction Grammar (CG) is a unified theory of knowledge of language modelled on knowledge of constructions. Each chapter illustrates the application of CG to a different sub-discipline, from those that are more well-established in the literature, such as argument structure and information packaging, to areas that have been addressed in depth more recently from this perspective, such as morphology, language variation and language change.

Type
Reviews
Information
English Today , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 61 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Booij, G. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, G. 2013. The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. 1988. ‘The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”’. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 14, 35–55.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. 2003. ‘Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language.’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, J. 2002. ‘From speech perception to morphology: Affix-ordering revisited.’ Language, 78(3), 527–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, J. & Plag, I. 2004. ‘What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 565–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, T. & Trousdale, G. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K. 2001. ‘A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions.’ Linguistics, 39(3), 463–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar