Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 15
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Barbier, Edward B. López, Ramón E. and Hochard, Jacob P. 2016. Debt, Poverty and Resource Management in a Rural Smallholder Economy. Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 63, Issue. 2, p. 411.

    Bowman, Maria S. 2016. Impact of foot-and-mouth disease status on deforestation in Brazilian Amazon and cerrado municipalities between 2000 and 2010. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 75, p. 25.

    Porro, Roberto Lopez-Feldman, Alejandro and Vela-Alvarado, Jorge W. 2015. Forest use and agriculture in Ucayali, Peru: Livelihood strategies, poverty and wealth in an Amazon frontier. Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 51, p. 47.

    Oestreicher, Jordan Sky Farella, Nicolina Paquet, Serge Davidson, Robert Lucotte, Marc Mertens, Frédéric and Saint-Charles, Johanne 2014. Livelihood activities and land-use at a riparian frontier of the Brazilian Amazon: quantitative characterization and qualitative insights into the influence of knowledge, values, and beliefs. Human Ecology, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 521.

    Caviglia-Harris, Jill L. Sills, Erin O. and Mullan, Katrina 2013. Migration and mobility on the Amazon frontier. Population and Environment, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 338.

    Jara-Rojas, Roberto Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. Engler, Alejandra and Díaz, José 2013. An analysis of the joint adoption of water conservation and soil conservation in Central Chile. Land Use Policy, Vol. 32, p. 292.

    da S. Martins, Paulo F. and da S. Pereira, Taynã Z. 2012. Cattle-raising and public credit in rural settlements in Eastern Amazon. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 20, p. 316.

    Arima, Eugenio Y Richards, Peter Walker, Robert and Caldas, Marcellus M 2011. Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 024010.

    BARBIER, EDWARD B. 2010. Poverty, development, and environment. Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 15, Issue. 06, p. 635.

    McElwee, Pamela D. 2010. Resource Use Among Rural Agricultural Households Near Protected Areas in Vietnam: The Social Costs of Conservation and Implications for Enforcement. Environmental Management, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 113.

    Amacher, Gregory S. Merry, Frank D. and Bowman, Maria S. 2009. Smallholder timber sale decisions on the Amazon frontier. Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, Issue. 6, p. 1787.

    Bowman, Maria S. Amacher, Gregory S. and Merry, Frank D. 2008. Fire use and prevention by traditional households in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics, Vol. 67, Issue. 1, p. 117.

    Browder, John O. Pedlowski, Marcos A. Walker, Robert Wynne, Randolph H. Summers, Percy M. Abad, Ana Becerra-Cordoba, Nancy and Mil-Homens, Joao 2008. Revisiting Theories of Frontier Expansion in the Brazilian Amazon: A Survey of the Colonist Farming Population in Rondônia’s Post-Frontier, 1992–2002. World Development, Vol. 36, Issue. 8, p. 1469.

    Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. Solís, Daniel Cocchi, Horacio and Quiroga, Ricardo E. 2006. The impact of soil conservation and output diversification on farm income in Central American hillside farming. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 267.

    Shone, Bryan M. and Caviglia-Harris, Jill L. 2006. Quantifying and comparing the value of non-timber forest products in the Amazon. Ecological Economics, Vol. 58, Issue. 2, p. 249.

  • Environment and Development Economics, Volume 9, Issue 2
  • May 2004, pp. 181-202

Household production and forest clearing: the role of farming in the development of the Amazon

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2004

Global tropical deforestation continues to be a critical environmental issue and nowhere in the world is the issue more pronounced than in Brazil. This paper examines the land-use choices of small-scale farmers in Ouro Preto do Oeste, Rondônia, Brazil and investigates how agricultural production impacts deforestation levels. The data used to explore these issues consist of a panel collected from 152 households in 1996 and 2000. Overall, the empirical models indicate that access to credit, wealth, lot size, product markets, and off-farm labor opportunities, largely influence deforestation and production decisions. Among other things, the results suggest that more sustainable production methods are unlikely to be adopted by a majority of households under current conditions because the production of milk has rapidly advanced due to its moderate labor requirements and existing market infrastructure. Households with greater levels of wealth have focused on milk while those with access to credit have focused on crops. Since the production of crops is largely influenced by access to credit, similar incentives may be proposed to support more sustainable production activities to help reduce deforestation.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environment and Development Economics
  • ISSN: 1355-770X
  • EISSN: 1469-4395
  • URL: /core/journals/environment-and-development-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *