Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Payments for environmental services and rural livelihood strategies in Ecuador and Guatemala

  • DOUGLAS SOUTHGATE (a1), TIMOTHY HAAB (a2), JOHN LUNDINE (a3) and FABIÁN RODRÍGUEZ (a4)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Presented in this paper are the results of two contingent valuation analyses, one undertaken in Ecuador and the other in Guatemala, of potential payments for environmental services (PES) directed toward rural households. We find that minimum compensation demanded by these households is far from uniform, depending in particular on individual strategies for raising incomes and dealing with risks. Our findings strengthen the case for allowing conservation payments to vary among recipients, which would be a departure from the current norm for PES initiatives in Latin America.

Copyright
References
Hide All
BinswangerH. (1980), ‘Attitudes toward risk: experimental measurement in rural India’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65: 395407.
FerraroP.J. (2001), ‘Global habitat protection: limitations of development interventions and a role for conservation performance payments’, Conservation Biology 15: 9901000.
FieldsG.S. (1975), ‘Rural-urban migration, urban unemployment and under-employment, and job search activity in LDCs’, Journal of Development Economics 2: 165188.
González-VegaC., Rodríguez-MezaJ., SouthgateD., and MaldonadoJ. (2004), ‘Poverty, structural transformation, and land use in El Salvador’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 13671374.
HaabT. and McConnellK. (2002), Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
HarrisJ.R. and TodaroM.P. (1970), ‘Migration, unemployment, and development: a two-sector analysis’, American Economic Review 60: 125142.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos, Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, y Servicio de Información y Censos Agropecuarios (INEC/MAG/SICA) (2002), III Censo Nacional Agropecuario: Resultados Nacionales y Provinciales, Volumen I, Quito (in Spanish).
Landell-MillsN. and PorrasI. (2002), Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impact on the Poor, London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
LigonE. and SchechterL. (2003), ‘Measuring vulnerability’, Economic Journal 113: 95102.
LundineJ. (2005), ‘An economic estimation of small land owner willingness to accept a reforestation project’, M.S. Thesis, Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
MarkowitzH. (1952), ‘Portfolio selection’, Journal of Finance 7: 7791.
MassonP. (2001), ‘Migration, human capital, and poverty in a dual-economy model of a developing economy’, Working Paper No. 01-128, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
Muñoz-PiñaC., GuevaraA., TorresJ., and BrañaJ. (2008), ‘Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: analysis, negotiations, and results’, Ecological Economics 65: 725736.
PagiolaS. (2002), ‘Paying for water services in Central America: learning from Costa Rica’, in PagiolaS., BishopJ., and Landell-MillsN. (eds), Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, London: Earthscan, pp. 3762.
PagiolaS. (2008), ‘Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica’, Ecological Economics 65: 712724.
RiceR.E., SugalC.A., RatayS.M., da FonsecaG.A.V. (2001), ‘Sustainable forest management: a review of conventional wisdom’, Advances in Applied Biodiversity Science, Number 3, Conservation International, Washington.
RobertsonN. and WunderS. (2005), Fresh Tracks in the Forest: Assessing Incipient Payments for Environmental Services Initiatives in Bolivia, Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
Rodríguez-MezaJ., SouthgateD., and González-VegaC. (2004), ‘Rural poverty, household responses to shocks, and agricultural land use: panel results for El Salvador’, Environment and Development Economics 9: 225239.
SchultzT.W. (1964), Transforming Traditional Agriculture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
SimpsonR.D. and SedjoR.A. (1996), ‘Paying for the conservation of endangered ecosystems’, Environment and Development Economics 1: 241257.
WunderS. and AlbánM. (2008), ‘Decentralized payments for environmental services: comparing the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador’, Ecological Economics 65: 685698.
ZbindenS. and LeeD.R. (2005), ‘Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA program’, World Development 33: 255272.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environment and Development Economics
  • ISSN: 1355-770X
  • EISSN: 1469-4395
  • URL: /core/journals/environment-and-development-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 31 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 112 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.