Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-2bgxn Total loading time: 0.396 Render date: 2022-12-05T10:59:17.971Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia's tropical rainforests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2010

ROSEMARY HILL*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 12139, Earlville BC, Cairns Qld 4870, Australia School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia
KRISTEN J. WILLIAMS
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 284, Canberra ACT 2619, Australia
PETINA L. PERT
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 12139, Earlville BC, Cairns Qld 4870, Australia
CATHERINE J. ROBINSON
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Qld Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
ALLAN P. DALE
Affiliation:
Terrain NRM Inc., PO Box 1756, Innisfail, QLD 4860, Australia
DAVID A. WESTCOTT
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 780, Atherton, QLD 4883, Australia
ROWENA A. GRACE
Affiliation:
Terrain NRM Inc., PO Box 1756, Innisfail, QLD 4860, Australia
TONY O'MALLEY
Affiliation:
Terrain NRM Inc., PO Box 1756, Innisfail, QLD 4860, Australia
*
*Correspondence: Dr Rosemary Hill e-mail: ro.hill@csiro.au

Summary

In the globally significant Australian tropical rainforests, poor performance of community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) approaches mandated by national policy highlights the importance of the global search for better models. This paper reports on co-research to develop, apply and test the transferability and effectiveness of a new model and tools for CBNRM in biodiversity conservation. Adaptive co-management, designed with specific communities and natural resources, recognized as linked multi-scalar phenomena, is the new face of CBNRM. New tools used to achieve adaptive co-management include a collaborative focal species approach focused on the iconic southern cassowary, scenario analysis, science brokering partnerships, a collaborative habitat investment atlas and institutional brokering. An intermediate-complexity analytical framework was used to test the robustness of these tools and therefore likely transferability. The tools meet multiple relevant standards across three dimensions, namely empowering institutions and individuals, ongoing systematic scientific assessment and securing effective on-ground action. Evaluation of effectiveness using a performance criteria framework identified achievement of many social and environmental outcomes. Effective CBNRM requires multi-scale multi-actor collaborative design, not simply devolution to local-scale governance. Bridging/boundary organizations are important to facilitate the process. Further research into collaborative design of CBNRM structures, functions, tools and processes for biodiversity conservation is recommended.

Type
THEMATIC SECTION: Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 1)
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C. (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27: 629649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, D.A., Berkes, F. & Doubleday, N.C. (2007) Introduction: moving beyond co-management. In: Adaptive Co-Management Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance, ed. Armitage, D.A., Berkes, F. & Doubleday, N.C., pp. 115. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Auditor-General (2008) Regional Delivery Model for the National Heritage Trust and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. Audit Report No. 21 2007–08 Performance Audit.Australian National Audit Office, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Government (2008) Caring for our Country Outcomes 2008–2013. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Batterbury, S.P.J. & Fernando, J.L. (2006) Rescaling governance and the impacts of political and environmental decentralization: an introduction. World Development 34: 18511863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104: 1518815193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 16921702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkes, F., Armitage, D.A. & Doubleday, N.C. (2007) Synthesis: adapting, innovating, evolving. In: Adaptive Co-Management Collaboration, Learning and Multi-Level Governance, ed. Armitage, D.A., Berkes, F. & Doubleday, N.C., pp. 308327. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. (1996) Collaborative Management of Protected Areas: Tailoring the Approach to the Context. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, C.J.A., Sodhi, N.S. & Brook, B.W. (2009) Tropical turmoil: a biodiversity tragedy in progress. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 7987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, J.S., Franzen, M.A., Holmes, C.M., Grote, M.N. & Mulder, M.B. (2006) Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 20: pp.–pp.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cash, D.W., Adger, W.N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Prtichard, L. & Young, O. (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11: 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth EPLA (2007) Biodiversity Significance of Mission Beach. Report to Terrain Natural Resource Management Ltd from Chenoweth Environmental Planning and Landscape Architecture, Brisbane, Australia [www document]. URL http://www.terrain.org.au/images/stories/programs/terrestrial-biodiversity/mission-beach/biodiversity-significance-25-10-07.pdfGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I.J. & O'Flaherty, R.M. (2007) Researchers, indigenous peoples, and place-based learning communities. Society and Natural Resources 20: 291305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEWHA (2009) EPBC Act Policy Statement 3.15 Significant Impact Guidelines for the endangered southern cassowary (Casuarius casuarius johnsonii) Wet Tropics Population July 2009. Australian Government DEWHA, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Fabricus, C. & Collins, S. (2007) Community-based natural resource management: governing the commons. Water Policy 9: 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falco-Mammone, F. (2007) The aesthetic and lifestyle significance of Mission Beach.Report. Focus on Research, Cairns, Australia.Google Scholar
Garibaldi, A. & Turner, N. (2004) Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society 9: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C.C. (1999) The Political Economy of Wildlife Policy in Africa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalo-Turpin, H., Couix, N. & Hazard, L. (2008) Rethinking partnerships with the aim of producing knowledge with practical relevance: a case study in the field of ecological restoration. Ecology and Society 13: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, D.J. & Levin, M. (2007) Introduction to Action Research. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardesty, B.D. & Westcott, D.A. (2008) Development of genetic survey methodologies for cassowaries. Report. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Atherton, Australia.Google Scholar
Hill, R. & Williams, L.J. (2009) Indigenous natural resource management: overcoming marginalisation produced in Australia's current NRM model. In: Contested Country: Local and Regional Environmental Management in Australia, ed. Lane, M.B., Robinson, C.J. & Taylor, B.M., pp. 161178. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Hugget, A. (2007) A Review of the Focal Species Approach in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Land and Water Australia.Google Scholar
Joseph, L.N., Maloney, R.F. & Possingham, H.P. (2009) Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol. Conservation Biology 23: 328338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, A.T. & Cowling, R.M. (2007) Embracing opportunism in the selection of priority conservation areas. Conservation Biology 21: 11241126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, A.T., Cowling, R.M. & Campbell, B.M. (2006) An operational model for implementing conservation action. Conservation Biology 20: 610617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambeck, R.J. (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conservation Biology 11: 849856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, M.B. & McDonald, G. (2005) Community-based environmental planning: operational dilemmas, planning principles and possible remedies. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 48: 709731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latch, P. (2007) Recovery plan for the southern cassowary Casuarius casuarius johnsonii 2007–2011. Report to Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra from Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Brisbane, Australia [www document]. URL http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/recovery/southern-cassowary/pubs/sth-cassowary.pdfGoogle Scholar
Leach, M., Mearns, R. & Scoones, I. (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development 27: 225247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandarano, L. (2009) Evaluating collaborative environmental planning outputs and outcomes: restoring and protecting habitat and the New York New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program. Journal of Planning Education and Research 27: 456468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (2009) Far North Queensland Regional Plan 2009–2031. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Government Department of Infrastructure and Planning.Google Scholar
Moritz, C. (2005) Overview: rainforest history and dynamics in the Australian wet tropics. In: Tropical Rainforests Past Present and Future, ed. Bermingham, E., Dick, C.W. & Moritz, C., pp. 313321. Chicago, IL, USA and London, UK: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nunan, F. (2006) Empowerment and institutions: managing fisheries in Uganda. World Development 34: 13161332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oroton Family Foundation and Placeways (2009) Community-Viz®: An ArcGIS® extention for land use planning. In: Placeways LLC [www document]. URL http://www.communityviz.orgGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104: 1518115187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change 2009: 354365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, A., Mcalpine, C.A., Ward, D. & Rayner, S. (2007) New regionalism and nature conservation: lessons from South East Queensland, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 82: 132144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G.D., Cumming, G.S. & Carpenter, S.R. (2003) Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 17: 358366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressey, R.L. & Bottrill, M.C. (2008) Opportunism, threats, and the evolution of systematic conservation planning. Conservation Biology 22: 13401345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, L. & Dovers, S. (2007) Community-based NRM boards of management: are they up to the task? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 14: 111122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C.J., Lane, M.B. & Taylor, B.M. (2009) Conclusion: the changing and contested governance of Australia's environmental heritage. In: Contested Country: Local and Regional Environmental Management in Australia, ed. Lane, M.B., Robinson, C.J. & Taylor, B.M., pp. 243245. Canberra, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Robinson, G.M. (1998) Methods and Techniques in Human Geography. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Salafsky, N., Salzer, D., Stattersfield, A.J., Hilton-Taylor, C., Neugarten, R., Butchart, S.H.M., Collen, B., Cox, N., Master, L.L., O'Connor, S. & Wilkie, D. (2008) A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation: unified classifications of threats and actions. Conservation Biology 22: 897911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandström, C. (2009) Institutional dimensions of comanagement: participation, power and process. Society and Natural Resources 22: 230244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayer, J. & Campbell, B. (2004) The Science of Sustainable Development Local Livelihoods and the Global Environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. (1998) Flagships, umbrellas and keystones: is single species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83: 247257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, M.J. (2008) Coercion, voluntary compliance and protest: the role of trust and legitimacy in combating local opposition to protected areas. Environmental Conservation 35: 200210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, P.C. (2005) Deliberative methods for understanding environmental systems. BioScience 55: 976982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stork, N.E., Goosem, S. & Turton, S.M. (2008) Australian rainforests in a global context. In: Living in a Dynamic Tropical Forest Lanscape, ed. Stork, N.E. & Turton, S.M., pp. 420. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stork, N.E. & Turton, S.M., eds. (2008) Living in a Dynamic Tropical Forest Landscape. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susskind, L. (1999) An alternative to Robert's rules of order for groups, organizations, and ad hoc assemblies that want to operate by consensus. In: The Consensus Building Handbook, ed. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S. & Thomas-Larner, J., pp. 357. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Tacconi, L. (2007) Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: theory and narrative. Global Environmental Change 17: 338348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Djiru Traditional Owners and Girringun Aboriginal Corporation (2007) Indigenous Cultural Significance Assessment Mission Beach.Report to CSIRO from P. Pentecost for Bilyana Archaeological Consultancies, Tully, Australia.Google Scholar
Westcott, D.A., Bentrupperbäumer, J.M., Bradford, M.G. & McKeown, A. (2005) Incorporating patterns of disperser behaviour into models of seed dispersal and its effects on estimated dispersal curves. Oecologia 146: 5767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, K.J., Hill, R., Pert, P.L., Harding, E.K. & O'Malley, T. (2009) Current, pre-clearing and 2025 scenarios of vegetation cover and cassowary habitat in Mission Beach and surrounds. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility Annual Conference, 28 April – 1 May 2008, ed. Taylor, R. & Long, S., pp. 130149. Cairns, Australia: Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Ltd [www document]. URL http://www.rrrc.org.au/publications/downloads/Theme-5-RRRC-Long-S-et-al-2009-MTSRF-Conference-Proceedings-2008.pdfGoogle Scholar
Williams, S.E. & Middleton, J. (2008) Climatic seasonality, resource bottlenecks, and abundance of rainforest birds: implications for global climate change. Diversity and Distributions 14: 6977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S.E., Shoo, L.P., Isaac, J.L., Hoffman, A.A. & Langham, G. (2008) Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change. PLoS Biology 6: 26212626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilmsen, C. (2008) Negotiating community, participation, knowledge and power in participatory research. In: Partnerships for Empowerment Participatory Research for Community-based Natural Resource Management, ed. Wilmsen, C., Elmendorf, W., Fisher, L., Ross, J., Sarathy, B. & Wells, G., pp. 122. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
28
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia's tropical rainforests
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia's tropical rainforests
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Adaptive community-based biodiversity conservation in Australia's tropical rainforests
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *