Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-mpvvr Total loading time: 0.252 Render date: 2021-08-07T07:08:33.704Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }
EnglishFrançais
Environmental Conservation Environmental Conservation

Article contents

The role of community participation in the effectiveness of UNESCO Biosphere Reserve management: evidence and reflections from two parallel global surveys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2010

S. STOLL-KLEEMANN ,
A. C. DE LA VEGA-LEINERT  and
L. SCHULTZ
S. STOLL-KLEEMANN
Affiliation:
Global Centre for Biosphere Reserve Advancement and Institute of Geography and Geology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Strasse 16, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
A. C. DE LA VEGA-LEINERT
Affiliation:
Global Centre for Biosphere Reserve Advancement and Institute of Geography and Geology, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University Greifswald, Friedrich-Ludwig-Jahn-Strasse 16, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany
L. SCHULTZ
Affiliation:
Stockholm Resilience Centre and Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Corresponding
E-mail address:
susanne.stoll-kleemann@uni-greifswald.de
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Summary

Biodiversity management has traditionally followed two contradictory approaches. One champions ecosystem protection through rigorous law enforcement and exclusion of humans. The other promotes community-based sustainable use of natural resources. Participatory conservation, a major paradigm shift, nowadays strongly guides the concept of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves (BRs). In this paper, the rationale for community participation, and the perception of its effectiveness among BR managers are analysed. Within the World Network of BRs (553 sites in 107 countries) diverse participatory approaches are being tried to advance community-based natural resource management (CBNRM). Data from two parallel surveys, involving managers from 276 BRs worldwide, reveal how far this participation paradigm shift has really occurred, and its influence on managers’ self-evaluated effectiveness. There is substantial regional disparity, although in general BR managers endorse inclusive conservation, despite critical implementation hurdles. The process of participatory conservation carries new dangers for effective biosphere reserve management, when the aspirations of communities and other stakeholders do not ‘fit’ with a predetermined interpretation of sustainable development.

Keywords

CBNRMcommunity-based natural resource managementcommunity participationprotected area management effectivenesssustainable development of natural resources and communitiesUNESCO Biosphere Reserves
Type
THEMATIC SECTION: Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 2)
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 37 , Issue 3: Thematic section. Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): Designing the next generation (Part 2) , September 2010 , pp. 227 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, N. & Jordan, A., eds (2009) Governing Sustainability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, W.M. & Hutton, J. (2007) People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society 5 (2): 147–183.Google Scholar
Adams, W.M., Avelling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B. & Wolmer, W. (1994) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306: 1146–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C. (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27 (4): 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batisse, M. (1993) Biosphere reserves: an overview. UNESCO. Nature and Resources 29: 3–5.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, J., Angelstam, P., Elmqvist, T., Emanuelsson, U., Folke, C., Ihse, M., Moberg, F. & Nystrom, M. (2003) Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. AMBIO 32 (6): 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berghöfer, U. & Berghöfer, A. (2006) Participation in development thinking: coming to grips with a truism and its critique. In: Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management. Theory and Practice, ed. Stoll-Kleemann, S. & Welp, M., pp. 79–116. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18 (5): 621–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertzky, M. & Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2009) Multi-level discrepancies with sharing data on protected areas: what we have and what we need for the global village. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 8–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouamrane, M., ed. (2007) Dialogue in Biosphere Reserves. References, Practices and Experiences. Biosphere Reserves: Technical Notes 2. Paris, France: UNESCO: 82 pp.Google Scholar
Brandon, K., Redford, K.H. & Sanderson, S.E., eds (1998) Parks in Peril: People, Politics and Protected Areas. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, A.G., Gullison, R.E., Rice, R.E & da Fonseca, G.A.B. (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291: 125–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, R.A. (2009) Appalling photos reveal lemur carnage in Madagascar. Wildmadagascar.org [www document]. URL http://news.mongabay.com/2009/0820-lemurs.htmlGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L.M. (2002) Conservation narratives in Costa Rica: conflict and co-existence. Development and Change 33: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearden, P., Bennett, M. & Johnston, J. (2005) Trends in global protected area governance, 1992–2002. Environmental Management 36 (1): 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R., Hansen, A., Newton, A.C. & Hansen, M.C. (2005) Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecological Applications 15 (1) 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Priscoli, J. (1997) Participation and conflict management in natural resources decision-making. In: Conflict Management and Public Participation in Land Management, EFI Proceedings 14, ed. Solberg, B. & Miina, S., pp. 61–87. Joensuu, Finland: European Forest Institute.Google Scholar
Dugelby, B. & Libby, M. (2003) Analyzing the social context at PiP sites: In: Parks in Peril: People, Politics and Protected Areas, ed. Brandon, K., Redford, K.H. & Sanderson, S.E., pp. 63–78. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Fabricius, C. & Koch, E. (2004) Rights, Resources and Rural Development: Community-based Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa. London: UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2008) The importance of law enforcement for protected areas: don't step back! be honest! protect! GAIA 17 (S1): 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz-Vietta, N. & Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2008) How to foster organizational capacity for integrated biosphere reserve management: the biosphere reserve Mananara-Nord, Madagascar. GAIA 17 (S1): 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gbadegesin, A. & Ayileka, O. (2000) Avoiding the mistakes of the past: towards a community oriented management strategy for the proposed National Park in Abuja-Nigeria. Land Use Policy 17: 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockings, M. (2003) Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. BioScience 53: 823–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, G. (2007) Protection, politics and protest: understanding resistance to conservation. Conservation and Society 5 (2): 184–201.Google Scholar
Ishwaran, N., Persic, A. & Hoang Tri, N. (2008) Concept and practices: the case of UNESCO biosphere reserves. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 7 (2): 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotze-Campen, H., Reusswig, F. & Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2008) Socio-ecological monitoring of biodiversity change: building upon the World Network of Biosphere Reserves. GAIA 17 (S1): 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McShane, T.O. & O'Connor, S. (2007) Hard choices: understanding the trade-offs between conservation and development. In: Protected Areas and Human Livelihoods, Working Paper 32, ed. Redford, K.H. & Fearn, E., pp. 145–152. Bronx, USA: Wildlife Conservation Society.Google Scholar
Mehring, M. & Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2010) Principle and practice of the buffer zone in biosphere reserves: from global to local. General perspective from managers versus local perspective from villagers in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. In: Tropical Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change, ed. Tscharntke, T., Leuschner, C., Veldkamp, E., Faust, H., Guhardja, E. & Bidin, A., pp. 413–426. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabhan, G.P. (1997) Cultures of Habitat: on Nature, Culture, and Story. Washington, DC, USA: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Folke, C. & Hahn, T. (2004) Social-ecological transformations for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9 (4): 2 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Riordan, T. (2002) Protecting beyond the protected. In: Biodiversity, Sustainability and Human Communities. Protecting Beyond the Protected, ed. O'Riordan, T. & Stoll-Kleemann, S., pp. 3–29. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J. (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302: 1912–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pretty, J.N. (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 23 (8): 1247–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullin, A.S. & Knight, T.M. (2009) Doing more good than harm. Building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biological Conservation 142: 931–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, W.V., Mooney, H.A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S.R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P., Dietz, T., Kumar Duraiappah, H.R., Kasperson, R., Leemans, R., May, R.M., McMichael, T.A.J., Pingali, P., Samper, C., Scholes, R., Watson, R.T., Zakri, A.H., Shidong, Z., Ash, N.J., Bennett, E., Kumar, P., Lee, M.J., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Simons, H., Thonell, J. & Zurez, M. (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press: 38 pp.Google Scholar
Salafsky, N. & Wollenberg, E. (2000) Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Development 28: 1421–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, S. & Bird, A. (1998) The new politics of protected areas. In: Parks in Peril: People, Politics and Protected Areas, ed. Brandon, K., Redford, K.H. & Sanderson, S.E., pp. 441–454. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Schliep, R. & Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2010) Assessing governance of biosphere reserves in Central Europe. Land Use Policy (in press).Google Scholar
Schultz, L. & Lundholm, C. (2010) Learning for resilience? Exploring learning opportunities in Biosphere Reserves. Environmental Education Research 1 (in press).Google Scholar
Schultz, L., Duit, A. & Folke, C. (2009) Participation and management performance in the World Network of Biosphere Reserves. In: Nurturing resilience in social-ecological systems. Ph.D. thesis, Natural Resource Management, Stockholm University, ed. Schultz, L., pp. V(1–25). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University [www document]. URL http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:214516Google Scholar
Schultz, L., Folke, C. & Olsson, P. (2007) Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation 34 (2): 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2005) Voices for biodiversity management in the 21st century. Environment 47 (10): 24–36.Google Scholar
Stoll-Kleemann, S. (2006) Barriers and success factors for implementing mechanisms for sustainable use of biodiversity. In: The Sustainable Harvest of Non-Timber Forest Products in China. Strategies to Balance Economics Benefits and Biodiversity Conservation, Proceedings of the Sino-German Symposium 2006, ed. Kleinn, C., Yang, Y., Weyerhäuser, H. & Stark, M., pp. 75–81. Beijing, Republic of China: Sino-German Center for Research Promotion.Google Scholar
Stoll-Kleemann, S. & Job, H. (2008) The relevance of effective protected areas for biodiversity conservation: an introduction. GAIA 17 (S1): 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll-Kleemann, S. & O'Riordan, T. (2002) From participation to partnership in biodiversity protection: experience from Germany and South Africa. Society and Natural Resources 15 (2): 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll-Kleemann, S. & Welp, M. (2008) Participatory and integrated management of biosphere reserves. Lessons learnt from case studies and a global survey. GAIA 17 (S1): 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Nature Conservancy (1995) Parks in Peril Source Book. Arlington, VA, USA: The Nature Conservancy, Latin America and Caribbean Division.Google Scholar
Twyman, C. (2000) Participatory conservation? Community-based natural resource management in Botswana. The Geographical Journal 166 (4): 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO (1984) Action plan for biosphere reserves. Nature and Resources 20 (4): 1–12.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1996) Biosphere Reserves: The Seville Strategy and the Statutory Framework of the World Network. Paris, France: UNESCO: 18 pp.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2008) Madrid Action Plan. Paris, France: UNESCO.Google ScholarPubMed
Uphoff, N. (1998) Community-based natural resource management: connecting micro and macro processes, and people with their environments. Plenary Presentation, International Community-Based Natural Resource Management Workshop, Washington, DC, USA [www document]. URL http://www.cbnrm.net/pdf/uphoff_001.pdfGoogle Scholar
White, R., Fischer, A., Hansen, H.P., Varjopuro, R., Young, J. & Adamescu, M. (2005) Conflict management, participation, social learning and attitudes in biodiversity conservation. Alter-Net Project, WPR4-2005-03 [www document]. URL http://www.alter-net.info/SITE/UPLOAD/DOCUMENT/outputs/ANet_WPR4_2005_03_Confl_Part_SL_Attitudes2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wilshusen, P.R., Brechin, S.R., Fortwangler, C.L. & West, P. (2002) Reinventing a square wheel: critique of a resurgent ‘protection paradigm’ in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources 15: 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Stoll-Kleemann supplementary material

Stoll-Kleemann supplementary material

Download Stoll-Kleemann supplementary material(File)
File 49 KB
46
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The role of community participation in the effectiveness of UNESCO Biosphere Reserve management: evidence and reflections from two parallel global surveys
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The role of community participation in the effectiveness of UNESCO Biosphere Reserve management: evidence and reflections from two parallel global surveys
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The role of community participation in the effectiveness of UNESCO Biosphere Reserve management: evidence and reflections from two parallel global surveys
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *