Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-54jdg Total loading time: 0.659 Render date: 2022-08-09T13:34:21.519Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Spatially explicit mortality of California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) across a marine reserve network

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2012

MATTHEW C. KAY*
Affiliation:
Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131, USA
JONO R. WILSON
Affiliation:
Sustainable Fisheries Group, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5131, USA
*
*Correspondence: Dr Matt Kay e-mail: mattckay@gmail.com

Summary

Studies of marine reserves typically focus upon differences in the size and abundance of target organisms inside versus outside reserve borders, but they seldom provide spatially explicit measurements of how reserves influence mortality rates. This study investigated mortality rates for female California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) at multiple sites inside and outside of three marine reserves at the Santa Barbara Channel Islands, California, USA. Mean total mortality (Z) of female lobsters was lower at sites inside reserves (Z = 0.22 [± 0.05 SE]) than at sites outside reserves (Z = 0.59 [± 0.02 SE]). Mean mortality at all sites inside reserves, and among sites near reserve centres (where Z = 0.17 [± 0.05 SE]), was similar to estimates of natural mortality for other temperate spiny lobster species. Among sites inside reserves, there was a positive relationship between mortality and proximity to reserve borders, but this relationship was absent among sites outside reserves. Mortality estimates were much more variable among sites inside reserves than at sites in fished areas. This variation is probably due to differential emigration rates from the three reserves, as well as site-specific ecological factors that influence population structure, demonstrating the importance of spatially explicit reserve sampling and understanding how ecological heterogeneity influences fisheries models.

Type
THEMATIC SECTION: Temperate Marine Protected Areas
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernethy, K.E., Allison, E.H., Molloy, P.P. & Côté, I.M. (2007) Why do fishers fish where they fish? Using the ideal free distribution to understand the behavior of artisanal reef fishers. Canadian Journal of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences 64 (11): 15951604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abesamis, R.A., Russ, G.R. & Alcala, A.C. (2006) Gradients of abundance of fish across no-take marine reserve boundaries: evidence from Philippine coral reefs. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 16 (4): 349371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahams, M.V. & Healy, M.C. (1990) Variation in the competitive abilities of fishermen and its influence on the spatial distribution of the British Columbia salmon troll fleet. Canadian Journal of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences 47 (6): 11161121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attwood, C.G. (2003) Dynamics of the fishery for galjoen (Dichistius capensis) with an assessment of monitoring methods. South African Journal of Marine Science 25 (1): 311330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, E.A. & MacCall, A.D. (2011) How useful is the ratio of fish density outside versus inside no-take marine reserves as a metric for fishery management control rules? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 68 (2): 343359.Google Scholar
Beverton, R.J.H. & Holt, S.J. (1957) On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations [1993 reprint of the 1957 edition]. London, UK: Chapman and Hall: 533 pp.Google Scholar
Bohnsack, J.A. (1999) Incorporating no-take marine reserves into precautionary management and stock assessment. NOAA Techical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-40, pp. 8-16. NOAA, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Botsford, L.W., Brumbaugh, D.R., Grimes, C., Kellner, J.B., Largier, J., O'Farrell, M.R., Ralston, S., Soulanille, E. & Wespestad, V. (2009) Connectivity, sustainability, and yield: bridging the gap between conventional fisheries management and marine protected areas. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 19 (1): 6995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CDFG (2008) Channel Islands marine protected areas: first 5 years of monitoring: 2003–2008, ed. Airarne, S. & Ugoretz, J.. CDFG, California, USA: 21 pp. [www document]. URL http://www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/channel_islands/fiveyears.asp Google Scholar
Caputi, N., Melville-Smith, R., de Lestang, S., How, J., Thomson, A., Stephenson, P., Wright, I. & Donohue, K. (2008) Draft Stock Assessment for the West Coast Rock Lobster Fishery. Western Australia Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, North Beach, Western Australia, Australia.Google Scholar
Chapman, M.R. & Kramer, D.L. (1999) Gradients in coral reef fish density and size across the Barbados Marine Reserve boundary: effects of reserve protection and habitat characteristics. Marine Ecology Progress Series 181: 8196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Côté, I.M., Mosqueira, I. & Reynolds, J.D. (2001) Effects of marine reserve characteristics on the protection of fish populations: a meta analysis. Journal of Fish Biology 59 (Supplement A): 178189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMartini, E.E. (1993) Modeling the potential of fishery reserves for managing Pacific coral reef fishes. Fishery Bulletin 91 (3): 414427.Google Scholar
Engle, J.M. (1979) Ecology and growth of juvenile California spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus (Randall). PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Barbara, California, USA: 298 pp.Google Scholar
García-Charton, J.A. & Pérez-Ruzafa, A. (1999) Ecological heterogeneity and the evaluation of the effects of marine reserves. Fisheries Research 42 (1): 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goñi, R., Quetglas, A. & Reñones, O. (2006) Spillover of spiny lobsters Palinurus elephas from a marine reserve to an adjoining fishery. Marine Ecology Progress Series 308: 207219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Götz, A., Kerwath, S.E., Attwood, C.G. & Sauer, W.H.H. (2008) Effects of fishing on population structure and life history of roman Chrysoblephus laticeps (Sparidae). Marine Ecology Progress Series 362: 245259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenveld, J.C. (2000) Stock assessment, ecology and economics as criteria for choosing between trap and trawl fisheries for spiny lobster Palinurus delagoae . Fisheries Research 48: 141155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guénette, S., Lauck, T. & Clark, C. (1998) Marine reserves: from Beverton and Holt to the present. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 8 (3): 251272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haist, V., Breen, P.A. & Starr, P.J. (2009) A multi-stock, length-based assessment model for New Zealand rock lobster (Jasus edwarsii). New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43 (1): 355371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, B.S. (2003) The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter? Ecological Applications 13: S117S137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmelin-Vivien, M., Le Diréach, L., Bayle-Sempere, J., Charbonnel, E., García-Charton, J.A., Ody, D., Pérez-Ruzafa, A., Reñones, O., Sánchez-Jerez, P. & Valle, C. (2008) Gradients of abundance and biomass across reserve boundaries in six Mediterranean marine protected areas: evidence of fish spillover? Biological Conservation 141 (7): 18291839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, T.W. & Robertson, R.A. (2009) Stakeholder collaboration in fisheries research: integrating knowledge among fishing leaders and science partners in northern New England. Society and Natural Resources 22 (1): 4255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R. & Walters, C.J. (1992) Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics & Uncertainty. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall: 570 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R., Micheli, F. & De Leo, G.A. (2006) Integrating marine protected areas with catch regulation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63 (3): 642649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaunda-Arara, B. & Rose, G.A. (2004) Effects of marine reef National Parks on fishery CPUE in Coastal Kenya. Biological Conservation 118 (1): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M.C., Lenihan, H.S, Guenther, C.M., Wilson, J.R., Miller, C.J. & Shrout, S.W. (2012) Collaborative assessment of spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) population and fisheries responses to a marine reserve network. Ecological Applications 22 (1): 322335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M.C., Lenihan, H.S., Miller, C.J. & Barsky, K. (2008) Numbers, body sizes, and movement of lobster. In: Channel Islands Marine Protected Areas: First 5 Years of Monitoring ed. Airame, S., & Ugoretz, J., pp. 89. Santa Barbara, CA, USA: California Department of Fish and Game.Google Scholar
Kellner, J.B., Tetreault, I., Gaines, S.D. & Nisbet, R.M. (2007) Fishing the line near marine reserves in single and multispecies fisheries. Ecological Applications 17 (4): 10391054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, S., Scott, D., MacDiarmid, A.B. & Babcock, R.C. (2000) Spiny lobster, Jasus edwarsii, recovery in New Zealand marine reserves. Biological Conservation 92 (3): 359369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, S.E., Halpern, B.S., Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B.I., Gaines, S.D., Airame, S. & Warner, R.R. (2009) Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 384: 3346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, E., García-Rubies, A. & Gordoa, A. (2000) Direct estimation of natural mortality rates for littoral marine fishes using population data from a marine reserve. Marine Biology 137 (5): 10671076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGilliard, C.R., Hilborn, R., MacCall, A., Punt, A.E. & Field, J.C. (2010) Can information from marine protected areas be used to inform control-rule-based management of small scale, data-poor stocks? ICES Journal of Marine Science 68 (1): 201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, E.A., Botsford, L.W., Kaplan, D.M. & O'Farrell, M.R. (2009) Marine reserve networks for species that move within a home range. Ecological Applications 19 (7): 18351847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polacheck, T. (1990) Year around closed areas as a mangement tool. Natural Resource Modeling 4: 327354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, D.E. (1981) Population dynamics of rock lobster Jasus tristani at the Tristan da Cunha group of islands. Fisheries Bulletin of South Africa 15 (1): 4966.Google Scholar
Quinn, T.J. & Deriso, R.B. (1999) Quantitative Fish Dynamics. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press: 560 pp.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Lizaso, J.L., Goñi, R., Reñones, O., García-Charton, J.A., Galzin, R., Bayle, J.T., Sánchez-Jerez, P., Pérez-Ruzafa, A. & Ramos, A.A. (2000) Density dependence in marine protected populations: a review. Environmental Conservation 27 (2): 144158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shears, N.T., Grace, R.V., Usmar, N.R., Kerr, V. & Babcock, R.C. (2006) Long-term trends in lobster populations in a partially protected vs. no-take marine park. Biological Conservation 132 (2): 222231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparre, P. & Venema, S.C. (1998) Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 306/1 Rev. 2. FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Swain, D.P. & Wade, E.J. (2003) Spatial distribution of catch and effort in a fishery for snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio): tests of predictions of the ideal free distribution. Canadian Journal of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences 60 (8): 897909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B.M. & McIlwain, J.L. (2010) Beyond abundance and biomass: effects of marine protected areas on the demography of a highly exploited reef fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 411: 243258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, C.J., Hilborn, R. & Parrish, R. (2007) An equilibrium model for predicting the efficacy of marine protected areas in coastal environments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64 (7): 10091018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, T.J. & Millar, R.B. (2005) Using marine reserves to estimate fishing mortality. Ecology Letters 8 (1): 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, T.J., Millar, R.B., Babcock, R.C. & Tolimieri, N. (2003) Burdens of evidence and the benefits of marine reserves: putting Descartes before des horse? Environmental Conservation 30 (2): 97103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.R., Prince, J.D. & Lenihan, H.S. (2010) A management strategy for sedentary nearshore species that uses marine protected areas as a reference. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management and Ecosystem Science 2 (1): 1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.R. (2011) Marine reserves and the management of small scale fisheries. PhD dissertation. University of California Santa Barbara, California, USA: 155pp.Google Scholar
10
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Spatially explicit mortality of California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) across a marine reserve network
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Spatially explicit mortality of California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) across a marine reserve network
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Spatially explicit mortality of California spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) across a marine reserve network
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *