Skip to main content Accessibility help

Can ecosystem services lead ecology on a transdisciplinary pathway?



The discipline of ecology has evolved through several phases as it has developed and defined itself and its relationship with human society. While it initially had little to do with human concerns, it has become more applied, and is today more integrated with the human element in the way it conceptualizes complex social-ecological systems. As the science has developed, so too have its relationships with other disciplines, as well as people and processes outside the domain of science. However, it is unclear how far ecology has progressed in developing these relationships and where it should best focus its efforts in the future in order to increase its relevance and role in society. The concept of ecosystem services (the benefits people get from nature) has the potential to further this integration and clarify ecology's role and relevance in society, however doubt remains as to whether the concept has helped ecology in developing disciplinary and societal relationships. This review assesses the progress of ecology in relation to a transdisciplinary knowledge hierarchy (empirical, pragmatic, normative and purposive) where all levels of the hierarchy are coordinated on the basis of an overall purpose introduced from the purposive level down. At each of the levels of the knowledge hierarchy, the principles of transdisciplinarity, ecology's progress, the contribution of ecosystem services to this progress and future directions for a transdisciplinary ecology are explored. Ecology has made good progress in developing an interdisciplinary dialogue between the natural and social sciences and sectors. It is well-integrated with empirical and pragmatic disciplines and coordinates research at these two levels. At the normative level, the absence of collaborative frameworks and planning instruments is a major gap limiting the influence that ecology can have on land and resource use decisions at this level. At the purposive level, ecology has limited interactions with a narrow set of values associated with ecological ethics and economics. There is an obvious need for ecology to engage with the purposive disciplines of philosophy, ethics and theology, but also a need for ecological research to transform itself into a social process dealing with values and norms of both society and science. Ecosystem services have helped ecology to make links with many disciplines at the empirical and pragmatic levels, provided a useful concept and framework for interactions at the normative level requiring further examination, and helped make values explicit, allowing ecologists to begin to interact with the purposive level. The Western ecological economic origins of the ecosystem service concept presents a potential constraint to interactions at the purposive level, and must be considered and addressed if ecosystem services are to further the development of a transdisciplinary ecology, the joint ecology-society debate and the formulation and execution of policy.


Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Dr Belinda Reyers e-mail:


Hide All
Abel, T. & Stepp, J.R. (2003) A new ecosystems ecology for anthropology. Conservation Ecology 7: 12 [www document]. URL
Allenby, B. (2006) The ontologies of industrial ecology? Progress in Industrial Ecology 3: 2839
Andersen, B. (2008) Research in the journal Landscape Ecology, 1987–2005. Landscape Ecology 23: 129134
Balmford, A. & Cowling, R.M. (2006) Fusion or failure? The future of conservation biology. Conservation Biology 20: 692695.
Blignaut, J. & Aronson, J. (2008) Getting serious about maintaining biodiversity. Conservation Letters 1: 1217.
Boyd, J. & Banzhaf, S. (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63: 616626.
Bunting, A.H. & Wynne-Edwards, V.C. (1964) Editorial. Journal of Applied Ecology 1: 12.
Caillon, S., & Degeorges, P. (2007) Biodiversity: negotiating the border between nature and culture. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 29192931.
Carpenter, S.R. & Folke, C. (2006) Ecology for transformation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 309315.
Carpenter, S.R. & Turner, M.G. (2007) A decade of ecosystems. Ecosystems 10: 519522.
Carpenter, S.R., De Fries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H.A., Polasky, S., Reid, W.V. & Scholes, R.J. (2006) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: research needs. Science 314: 257258.
Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R.S., Diaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H.M., Perrings, C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J. & Whyte, A. (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 13051312.
Castilla, J.C. (2000) Roles of experimental marine ecology in coastal management and conservation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250: 321.
Costanza, R. (2008) Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation 141: 350352.
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neil, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & can den Belt, M. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253260.
Costanza, R. & Farber, S. (2002) Introduction to the special issue on the dynamics and value of ecosystem services: Integrating economic and ecological perspectives. Ecological Economics 41:367373.
Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N.L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D.E., Glenn, L.M., Hudspeth, T., Mahoney, D., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, S.A.T., Rizzo, D.M., Simpatico, T. & Snapp, R. (2007) Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics 61: 267276.
Cowling, R.M., Egoh, B., Knight, A.T., O'Farrell, P., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Roux, D., Welz, A. & Wilhelm-Rechman, A. (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 94839488.
Daily, G.C. (1997) Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Daily, G.C. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1999) Managing Earth's ecosystems: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems 2: 277280.
Daily, G.C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T.H., Salzman, J. & Shallenberger, R. (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 7: 2128,
De Groot, R., Wilson, M.A. & Boumans, R.M. (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393408.
Drew, J.A. & Henne, A.P. (2006) Conservation biology and traditional ecological knowledge: integrating academic disciplines for better conservation practice. Ecology and Society 11: 34 [www document]. URL
Egoh, B., Rouget, M., Reyers, B., Knight, A.T., Cowling, R.M., van Jaarsveld, A.S. & Welz, A. (2007) Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecological Economics 63: 714721.
Ehrenfeld, D. (1987) Editorial. Conservation Biology 1: 67.
Ehrlich, P.R. & Levin, S.A. (2005) The evolution of norms. Public Library of Science Biology: 6: 943948.
Faber, M. (2008) How to be an ecological economist. Ecological Economics 66: 17
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. (2005) Adaptive governance of social– ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30: 441473.
Fox, H.E., Christian, C., Nordby, J.C., Pergams, O.R.W., Peterson, G.D. & Pyke, C.R. (2006) Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conservation Biology 20: 18171820.
Gragson, T.L. & Grove, M. (2006) Social science in the context of the long term ecological research program. Society and Natural Resources 19: 93100.
Hadorn, H.G., Bradley, D., Pohl, C., Rist, S. & Wiesmann, U. (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics 60: 119128.
Hodgson, S.M., Maltby, L., Paetzold, A. & Phillips, D. (2007) Getting a measure of nature: cultures and values in an ecosystem services approach. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32: 249262.
Horlick-Jones, T. & Sime, J. (2004) Living on the border: knowledge, risk andt ransdisciplinarity. Futures Transdisciplinarity 36: 441456.
Jantsch, E. (1972) Towards Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In: Interdisciplinarity. Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, pp 97121. Paris, France: OECD.
Kessler, W.B. & Thomas, J.W. (2006) Conservation biology from the perspective of natural resource management disciplines. Conservation Biology 20: 670673.
Knight, A.T., Cowling, R.M. & Campbell, B.M. (2006) An operational model for implementing conservation action. Conservation Biology 20: 408419.
Kremen, C. & Ostfeld, R.O. (2005) A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 3: 540548.
Kumar, M. & Kumar, P. (2008) Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 64: 808819.
Lawrence, R.J. & Despres, C. (2004) Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures 36: 397405.
Le Maitre, D.C., Milton, S.J., Jarmain, C., Colvin, C.A., Saayman, I. & Vlok, J.H. (2007) Linking ecosystem services and water resources: landscape-scale hydrology of the Little Karoo. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment: 5: 261270.
Lengwiler, M. (2006) Between charisma and heuristics: four styles of interdisciplinarity. Science andPublic Policy 33: 423434.
Liu, S., Costanza, R., Farber, S. & Troy, A. (2010) Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1185: 5478.
Lovell, S.T. & Johnston, D.M. (2009) Designing landscapes for performance based on emerging principles in landscape ecology. Ecology and Society. 14: 44 [www document]. URL
Lowe, P., Whitman, G. & Phillipson, J. (2009) Ecology and the social sciences. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 297305.
Lubchenco, J. (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 279: 491497.
Ludwig, D. Mangel, M. & Haddad, B. (2001) Ecology, conservation, and public policy. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 32: 481517.
MA (2003) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: a Framework for Assessment Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute, Island Press.
MA (2005 a) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute, Island Press.
MA (2005 b) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute, Island Press.
MA (2005 c) Business industry perspective on the findings of the MA.
Mangel, M., Talbot, L.M., Meffe, G.K., Agardy, M., Alverson, D.L., Barlow, J., Botkin, D.B., Budowski, G., Clark, T., Cooke, J., Crozier, R.H., Dayton, P.K., Elder, D.L., Fowler, C.W., Funtowicz, S., Giske, J., Hofman, R.J., Holt, S.J., Kellert, S.R., Kimball, L.A., Ludwig, D., Magnusson, K., Malayang, B.S., Mann, C., Norse, E.A., Northridge, S. P., Perrin, W. F., Perrings, C., Peterman, R.M., Rabb, G.B., Regier, H.A., Reynolds, J.E., Sherman, K., Sissenwine, M.P., Smith, T.D., Starfield, A., Taylor, R.J., Tillman, M.F., Toft, C., Twiss, J.R., Wilen, J. & Young, T.P. (1996) Principles for the conservation of wild living resources. Ecological Applications 6: 338362.
Mascia, M.B., Brosius, J.P., Dobson, T.A., Forbes, B.C., Horowitz, L., McKean, M.A. & Turner, N.J. (2003) Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology 17: 649650.
Max-Neef, M.A. (2005) Foundations of transdisciplinarity. Ecological Economics 53: 516.
May, R.M. (2004) Ecology. Ethics and amphibians. Nature 431: 403403.
McCauley, D.J. (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443: 2728.
Meffe, G.K., Ehrenfeld, D. & Noss, R.F. (2006) Conservation Biology at twenty. Conservation Biology 20: 595596.
Mooney, H.A. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1997) Ecosystem services: a fragmentary history. In: Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, ed. Daily, G., pp. 1122. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Nicholson, E., Mace, G.M., Armsworth, P.R., Atkinson, G., Buckle, S., Clements, T., Ewers, R.M., Fa, J.E., Gardner, T.A., Gibbons, J., Grenyer, R., Metcalfe, R., Mourato, S., Muuls, M., Osborn, D., Reuman, D.C., Watson, C. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2009) Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 11391144.
Norton, B.G. (2008) Beyond positivist ecology: toward an integrated ecological ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 14: 581592.
Noss, R.F. (1996) Conservation biology, values, and advocacy. Conservation Biology 10: 904.
O'Farrell, P.J. & Anderson, P.M.L. (2010) Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.005
Ormerod, S.J. (2003) Current issues with fish and fisheries: editor's overview and introduction. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 204213.
Ormerod, S.J. & Watkinson, A.R. (2000) Large-scale ecology and hydrology: an introductory perspective from the editors of the Journal of Applied Ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 15.
Phillipson, J., Lowe, P. & Bullock, J.M. (2009) Navigating the social sciences: interdisciplinarity and ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 261264.
Raymond, C.M., Bryan, B.A., Hatton MacDonald, D., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A. & Kalivas, T. (2009) Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 68: 13011315.
Ramadier, T. (2004) Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures 36: 423439.
Redford, K.H. & Adams, W.M. (2009) Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conservation Biology 23: 785787.
Redman, C.L. (1999) Human dimensions of ecosystem studies. Ecosystems 2: 296298.
Reid, W. (2006) Nature: the many benefits of ecosystems services Nature 443: 749.
Reyers, B., Roux, D.J., Cowling, R.M., Ginsburg, A.E., Nel, J.L. & O’ Farrell, P. (2010) Putting conservation plans to work: conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conservation Biology 24: 957965.
Robinson, J.G. (2006) Conservation biology and real-world conservation. Conservation Biology 20: 658669.
Ropke, I. (2004) The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecological Economics 50: 293314.
Rose, K.A. & Cowan, J.H. (2003) Data, models, and decisions in US Marine Fisheries management: lessons for ecologists. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34: 127151.
Roux, D.J., Ashton, P.J., Nel, J.L. & MacKay, H.M. (2008) Improving cross-sector policy integration and cooperation in support of freshwater conservation. Conservation Biology 22: 13821387.
Satake, A. & Iwasa, Y. (2009) Preface to special feature: interface between ecology and social sciences in global environmental change. Ecological Research 24: 477478.
Saunders, C.D., Brook, A.T. & Eugene Myers, O. (2006) Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conservation Biology 20: 702705.
Scheffer, M., Brock, W. & Westley, F. (2000) Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services: an interdisciplinary theoretical analysis. Ecosystems 3: 451471.
Serafy, S.E. (1998) Pricing the invaluable: the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics 25: 2527.
Steffen, W. (2009) Interdisciplinary research for managing ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 13011302.
Termorshuizen, J.W. & Opdam, P. (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 24: 10371052.
Theobald, D.M., Hobbs, N.T., Bearly, T., Zack, J.A., Shenk, T. & Riebsame, W.E. (2000) Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision making: designing a system for conservation planning. Landscape Ecology 15: 3545.
Theobald, D.M., Spies, T., Kline, J., Maxwell, B., Hobbs, NT. & Dale, V.H. (2005) Ecological support for rural land-use planning. Ecological Applications 15: 19061914.
Tisdell, C.A. (1989) Environmental conservation: economics, ecology, and ethics. Environmental Conservation 16:107112.
Tress, B., Tress, G. & Fry, G. (2005) Researchers’ experiences, positive and negative, in integrated landscape projects. Environmental Management 36: 792807.
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A.M., Kruess, A., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Thies, C. (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity: ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters 8: 857874.
Turner, M.G. & Carpenter, S.R. (1999) Tips and traps in interdisciplinary research. Ecosystems 2: 275276.
Turner, R.K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Forber, S., Jessamy, V. & Georgiou, S. (2003) Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics 46: 493510.
van Wyk, E., Roux, D.J., Drackner, M. & McCool, S.F. (2008) The impact of scientific information on ecosystem management: making sense of the contextual gap between information providers and decision makers. Environmental Management 41: 779791.
Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubechenco, J. & Melillo, J.M. (1997) Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 277: 494499.
von Hauff, M. & Wilderer, P.A. (2008) Industrial ecology: engineered representation of sustainability. Sustainability Science 3: 103115.
Wendland, K.J., Honzák, M., Portela, R., Vitale, B., Rubinoff, S. & Randrianarisoa, J. (2010) Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar, Ecological Economics 69: 20932107.
Wilson, R.S. (2008) Balancing emotion and cognition: a case for decision aiding in conservation efforts. Conservation Biology 22: 14521460.
Wu, J. (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecology, 21: 14.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Can ecosystem services lead ecology on a transdisciplinary pathway?



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.