Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Beyond elite capture? Community-based natural resource management and power in Mohammed Nagar village, Andhra Pradesh, India

  • MOEKO SAITO-JENSEN (a1), IBEN NATHAN (a1) and THORSTEN TREUE (a1)
Abstract
SUMMARY

Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) projects and policies often aim to improve the livelihoods of rural people who depend on natural resources, and to promote democratic decision making and equitable benefit distribution at the local level. However, a growing number of critics argue that CBNRM is susceptible to elite capture. This paper contributes to the debate on elite capture under CBNRM by studying joint forest management (JFM) in Andhra Pradesh (India) and, in particular, the case of Mohammed Nagar village. The paper addresses the following four questions: (1) How has the Indian Government formally addressed the risk of elite capture? (2) What actually happened over time when formal structures of JFM interacted with the pre-existing social structure in Mohammed Nagar? (3) When JFM results in elite capture, is this owing to the formal structures and/or the pre-existing social structure? (4) How can CBNRM be designed to avoid or minimize elite capture? Based on a reading of official government documents, the Indian Government has addressed the risk of elite capture, by ensuring representation of different social groups in the decision making bodies, regular elections, collective action in rule making and implementation, and transparency in record keeping. Nevertheless, during Mohammed Nagar's 10 years of JFM history elite capture did occur. This confirms that elite capture is a possible outcome of CBNRM. Yet, the subsequent fall of elite capture in the village also indicates that this is not necessarily a permanent outcome, and that CBNRM may in fact promote democratic and equitable resource management in the long-term. In Mohammed Nagar elite capture was largely owing to pre-existing social structures and to weaknesses in the official rules that were meant to safeguard the interests of marginalized groups. Accordingly, in CBNRM project design and implementation, pre-existing social structures' potential promotion of elite capture need to be taken into account and formal measures that might alleviate the adverse effects and/or reduce this risk must be identified.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Dr Moeko Saito-Jensen e-mail: moesaito@gmail.com
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B. Agarwal (1997) Environmental action, gender equity and women's participation. Development and Change 28: 144.

A. Agrawal & C.C. Gibson (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27: 629649.

J.P. Brosius , A.L. Tsing & C. Zerner (1998) Representing communities: histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 11: 157168.

B. Campbell , A. Mandondo , N. Nemarundwe , B. Sithole , W. de Jong , M. Luckert & F. Matose (2001) Challenges to proponents of common property resource systems: despairing voices from the social forests of Zimbabwe. World Development 29: 589600.

M.M. Cernea , ed. (1985) Putting People First: Sociological Variables it Rural Development. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.

F. Cleaver (1999) Paradoxes of participation: questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development 11: 597612.

F. Cleaver (2005) The inequality of social capital and the reproduction of chronic poverty. World Development 33: 893906.

Government of India (1990) Involving of village communities and voluntary agencies for regeneration of degraded forest lands (Letter no. 6–21/89-PP, June 1, 1990). Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi, India.

Government of India (2005) State of Forest Report 2005. Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi, India.

I. Guijt & M. Shah , eds (1998) The Myth of Community: Gender Issues in Participatory Development. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.

S. Kumar (2002) Does ‘participation’ in common pool resource management help the poor? A social cost-benefit analysis of joint forest management in Jharkhand, India. World Development 30: 763782.

B. Latour (1987) Science in Action. How to Follow Engineers and Scientists through Society. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

N. Long (2001) Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. London, UK and New York, NY, USA: Routledge.

G. Mansuri & V. Rao (2004) Community-based and driven development: a critical review. The World Bank Research Observer 19: 139.

J.C. Ribot (2004) Waiting for Democracy: the Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.

O. Springate-Baginsky & P. Blaikie , eds (2007) Forests, People & Power; The Political Ecology of Reform in South Asia. London, UK: Earthscan.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Saito-Jensen supplementary material
Questionnaire.doc

 Word (219 KB)
219 KB