Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Drivers of retention and discards of elasmobranch non-target catch

  • KELSEY C. JAMES (a1) (a2), REBECCA L. LEWISON (a2), PETER W. DILLINGHAM (a3) (a4), K. ALEXANDRA CURTIS (a5) and JEFFREY E. MOORE (a6)...

Summary

To address growing concern over the effects of fisheries non-target catch on elasmobranchs worldwide, the accurate reporting of elasmobranch catch is essential. This requires data on a combination of measures, including reported landings, retained and discarded non-target catch, and post-discard survival. Identification of the factors influencing discard versus retention is needed to improve catch estimates and to determine wasteful fishing practices. To do this, retention rates of elasmobranch non-target catch in a broad subset of fisheries throughout the world were compared by taxon, fishing country, and gear. A regression tree and random forest analysis indicated that taxon was the most important determinant of retention in this dataset, but all three factors together explained 59% of the variance. Estimates of total elasmobranch removals were calculated by dividing the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) global elasmobranch landings by average retention rates, and suggest that total elasmobranch removals may exceed FAO reported landings by as much as 400%. This analysis is the first effort to directly characterize global drivers of discards for elasmobranch non-target catch. The results highlight the importance of accurate quantification of retention and discard rates to improve assessments of the potential impacts of fisheries on these species.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Drivers of retention and discards of elasmobranch non-target catch
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Drivers of retention and discards of elasmobranch non-target catch
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Drivers of retention and discards of elasmobranch non-target catch
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Kelsey C. James e-mail: kelsey.c.james@gmail.com

References

Hide All
Adler, D. (2005) vioplot: Violin plot. R package version 0.2 [www document]. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vioplot
AFP (2012) Marshalls fine Japanese ship over shark fin ban. Agence France Press [www document]. URL http://www.alternet.org/rss/breaking_news/815892/marshalls_fine_japanese_ship_in_shark_fin_ban
Akhilesh, K.V., Ganga, U., Pillai, N.G.K., Vivekanandan, E., Bineesh, K.K., Shanis, C.P.R. & Hashim, M. (2011) Deep-sea fishing for chondrichthyan resources and sustainability concerns: a case study from southwest coast of India. Indian Journal of Geological and Marine Sciences 40 (3): 347355.
Alverson, D.L., Freeberg, M.H., Pope, J.G. & Murawski, S.A. (1994) A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 339, FAO, Rome, Italy: 233 pp.
Australian Government (2011) Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Fisheries Legislation (Repeal and Amendment) Regulations 2001 (No. 1). Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2011L01592. 28 July 2011: 41 pp. [www document]. URL http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011L01592
Baeta, F., Batista, M., Maia, A., Costa, M.J. & Cabral, H. (2010) Elasmobranch bycatch in a trammel net fishery in the Portuguese west coast. Fisheries Research 102: 123129.
Barker, M.J. & Schluessel, V. (2005) Managing global shark fisheries: suggestions for prioritizing management strategies. Aquatic Conservation: Marine Freshwater Ecosystems 15: 325347.
Bellido, J.M., Santos, M.B., Pennino, M.G., Valeiras, X. & Pierce, G.J. (2011) Fishery discards and bycatch: solutions for an ecosystem approach to fisheries management? Hydrobiologia 670: 317333.
Braccini, M., Van Rijn, J. & Frick, L. (2012) High post-capture survival for sharks, rays and chimaeras discarded in the main shark fishery of Australia? PLoS One 7 (2): e32547.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R. & Stone, C. (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth.
Bromhead, D., Clarke, S., Hoyle, S., Muller, B., Sharples, P. & Harley, S. (2012) Identification of factors influencing shark catch and mortality in the Marshall Islands tuna longline fishery and management implications. Journal of Fish Biology 80: 18701894.
Campana, S.E., Joyce, W. & Manning, M.J. (2009) Bycatch and discard mortality in commercially caught blue sharks Prionace glauca assessed using archival satellite pop-up tags. Marine Ecology Progress Series 387: 241253.
Catarci, C. (2004) World markets and industry of selected commercially-exploited aquatic species with an international conservation profile. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 990, Rome, Italy: 186 pp.
Catchpole, T.L., Enever, R., Maxwell, D.L., Armstrong, M.J., Reese, A. & Revill, A.S. (2011) Constructing indices to detect temporal trends in discarding. Fisheries Research 107: 9499.
Chiaramonte, G.E. (1998) Shark fisheries in Argentina. Marine and Freshwater Research 49: 601609.
Clarke, S.C., McAllister, M.K., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Kirkwood, G.P., Michielsens, C.G.J., Agnew, D.J., Pikitch, E.K., Nakano, H. & Shivji, M.S. (2006) Global estimates of shark catches using trade records from commercial markets. Ecology Letters 9: 11151126.
Clarke, S.C., Harley, S.J., Hoyle, S.D. & Rice, J.S. (2012) Population trends in Pacific oceanic sharks and the utility of regulations on shark finning. Conservation Biology 27 (1): 197209.
Coelho, R., Erzini, K., Bentes, L., Correia, C., Lino, P.G., Monteiro, P., Ribeiro, J. & Goncalves, J.M.S. (2005) Semi-pelagic longline and trammel net elasmobranch catches in southern Portugal: catch composition, catch rates and discards. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science 35: 531537.
Cortes, E. (2002) Incorporating uncertainty into demographic modeling: application to shark populations and their conservation. Conservation Biology 16 (4): 10481062.
Crowder, L.B., Hazen, E.L., Avissar, N., Bjorkland, R., Latanich, C. & Ogburn, M.B. (2008) The impacts of fisheries on marine ecosystems and the transition to ecosystem-based management. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39: 259278.
Damalas, D. & Vassilopoulou, V. (2011) Chondrichthyan by-catch and discards in the demersal trawl fishery of the central Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). Fisheries Research 108: 142152.
Davies, R.W.D., Cripps, S.J., Nickson, A. & Perter, G. (2009) Defining and estimating global marine fisheries bycatch. Marine Policy 33: 661672.
Dayton, P.K., Thrush, S.F., Agardy, M.T. & Hofman, R.J. (1995) Environmental effects of marine fishing. Aquatic Conservation 5: 205323.
Dell’Apa, A., Kimmel, D.G. & Clo, S. (2012) Trends of fish and elasmobranch landings in Italy: associated management implications. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69 (6): 10451052.
Domi, N., Bouquegneau, J.M. & Das, K. (2005) Feeding ecology of five commercial shark species of the Celtic Sea through stable isotope and trace metal analysis. Marine Environmental Research 60: 551569.
Dulvy, N.K., Fowler, S.L., Musick, J.A., Cavanagh, R.D., Kyne, P.M., Harrison, L.R., Carlson, J.K., Davidson, L.N.K., Fordham, S.V., Francis, M.P., et al. (2014) Extinction risk and conservation of the world's sharks and rays. eLife 3: e00590.
Dulvy, N.K., Baum, J.K., Clarke, S., Compagno, L.J.V., Cortes, E., Domingo, A., Fordham, S., Fowler, S., Francis, M.P., Gibson, C., Martinez, J., Musick, J.A., Soldo, A., Stevens, J.D. & Valenti, S. (2008) You can swim but you can't hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 18: 459482.
Dulvy, N.K., Metcalfe, J.D., Glanville, J., Pawson, M.G. & Reynolds, J.D. (2000) Fishery stability, local extinctions, and shifts in community structure in skates. Conservation Biology 14 (1): 283293.
Enever, R., Catchpole, T.L., Ellis, J.R. & Grant, A. (2009) The survival of skates (Rajidae) caught by demersal trawlers fishing in UK waters. Fisheries Research 97: 7276.
Estalles, M., Coller, N.M., Perier, M.R. & Di Giacomo, E.E. (2011) Skates in the demersal trawl fishery of San Matias Gulf, Patagonia: species composition, relative abundance and maturity stages. Aquatic Living Resources 24: 193199.
EU (2003) Council regulation (EC) No. 1185/2003 [www document]. URL http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32003R1185
Feekings, J., Bartolino, V., Madsen, N. & Catchpole, T. (2012) Fishery discards: factors affecting their variability within a demersal trawl fishery. PLoS One 7 (4): e36409.
Fischer, J., Erikstein, K., D’Offay, B., Barone, M. & Guggisberg, S. (2012) Review of the implementation plan of action for the conservation and management of sharks. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1076. FAO, Rome, Italy: 125 pp. [www document]. URL http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i3036e/i3036e.pdf
Fong, Q.S.W. & Anderson, J.L. (2002) International shark fin markets and shark management: an integrated market preference-cohort analysis of the blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus). Ecological Economics 40: 117130.
FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. FAO, Rome, Italy: 41 pp. [www document]. URL http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/v9878e/v9878e00.htm
FAO (2014) Fisheries and aquaculture software. FishStatJ - software for fishery statistical time series. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Rome, Italy [www document]. URL http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en
Hall, M.A., Alverson, D.L. & Metuzals, K.I. (2000) By-catch: problems and solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin 41 (1): 204219.
Hariede, N.R., Carlson, J., Clarke, M., Clarke, S., Ellis, J., Fordham, S., Fowler, S., Pinho, M., Raymakers, C., Serena, F., Seret, B. & Polti, S. (2007) European shark fisheries: a preliminary investigation into fisheries, conversion factors, trade products, markets and management measures. European Elasmobranch Association: 61 pp. [www document] URL http://www.sasama.info/en/pdf/Hareide_2007.pdf
Harrington, J.M., Myers, R.A. & Rosenberg, A.A. (2005) Wasted fishery resources: discarded by-catch in the USA. Fish and Fisheries 6: 350361.
Hobsbawn, P.I. & Wilson, D.T. (2009) Australian national report to the scientific committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission for 2009. Report to the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, Australia: 18 pp.
Holden, M.J. (1973) Are long-term sustainable fisheries for elasmobranchs possible? Rapports et Procés Verbaux des Rèunions du Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 164: 360367.
Hueter, R.E. & Manire, C.A. (1994) Bycatch and catch-release mortality of small sharks in the Gulf coast nursery grounds of Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor. Mote Marine Technical Report No. 368. Final report to NOAA/NMFS, MARFIN project NA17FF0378–01. Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL, USA: 183 pp. [www document]. URL http://aquaticcommons.org/15269/1/368.pdf
Kelleher, K. (2005) Discards in the world's marine fisheries. An update. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 470, Rome, Italy: 131 pp. [www document]. URL http://www.fao.org/3/a-y5936e.pdf
Lack, M. & Sant, G. (2011) The future of sharks: a review of action and inaction. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, UK and the Pew Environment Group, Washington, DC, USA [www document]. URL http://www.traffic.org/fisheries-reports/traffic_pub_fisheries11.pdf
Laptikhovsky, V.V. (2004) Survival rates for rays discarded by the bottom trawl squid fishery off the Falkland Islands. Fishery Bulletin 102 (4): 757759.
Lewison, R.L., Crowder, L.B., Read, A.J. & Freeman, S.A. (2004) Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19 (11): 598604.
Lewison, R.L., Crowder, L.B., Wallace, B.P., Moore, J.E., Cox, T., Zydelis, R., McDonald, S., DiMatteo, A., Dunn, D.C., Kot, C.Y., Bjorkland, R., Kelez, S., Soykan, C., Steward, K.R., Sims, M., Boustany, A., Read, A.J., Halpin, P., Nichols, W.J. & Safina, C. (2014) Global patterns of marine mammal, seabird, and sea turtle bycatch reveal taxa-specific and cumulative megafauna hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 111 (14): 52715276.
Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. (2002) Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2 (3): 1922 [www document]. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/
Link, J.S. (2007) Underappreciated species in ecology: ‘ugly fish’ in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Ecological Applications 17 (7): 20372060.
Liu, S.-Y.V., Chan, C.-L.C., Lin, O., Hu, C.-S. & Chen, C.A. (2013) DNA barcoding of shark meats identify species composition and CITES-listed species from the markets in Taiwan. PLoS One. 8 (11): e79373.
Machado, P.B., Gordo, L.S. & Figueiredo, I. (2004) Skate and ray species composition in mainland Portugal from the commercial landings. Aquatic Living Resources 17: 231234.
MIRC (2011) Amended Laws P.L.2011–63. Title 51 Management of Marine Resources. Chapter 2. Fisheries Act 1997. Part 4 Prohibition on Shark. §229–231: 1723–1724. Marshall Islands Marine Resources Authority.
Molina, J.M. & Cooke, S.J. (2012) Trends in shark bycatch research: current status and research needs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 22: 719737.
Morgan, A. & Carlson, J.K. (2010) Capture time, size and hooking mortality of bottom longline-caught sharks. Fisheries Research 101: 3237.
Murawski, S.A. (1996) Factors influencing by-catch and discard rates: analysis from multispecies/multifishery sea sampling. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science 19: 3139.
Myers, R.A., Baum, J.K., Shepherd, T.D., Powers, S.P. & Peterson, C.H. (2007) Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean. Science 315: 18461850.
NMFS (2005) 2005 Report to congress pursuant to the shark finning prohibition act of 2000. US National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA Fisheries, Silver Spring, MD, USA [www document]. URL http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/by_catch/Shark%20Finning%20Report.pdf
Radio New Zealand (2013) Fishing boat banned from Marshalls waters for violating shark finning ban [www document]. URL http://www.radionz.co.nz/international/pacific-news/211557/fishing-boat-banned-from-marshalls-waters-for-violating-shark-finning-ban
Rago, P.J., Sosebee, K.A., Brodziak, J.K. T., Murawski, S.A. & Anderson, E.D. (1998) Implications of recent increases in catches on the dynamics of Northwest Atlantic spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Fisheries Research 39: 165181.
Read, A.J., Drinker, P. & Northridge, S. (2006) Bycatch of marine mammals in US and global fisheries. Conservation Biology 20 (1): 163169.
Robards, M.D. & Reeves, R.R. (2011) The global extent and character of marine mammal consumption by humans: 1970–2009. Biological Conservation 144: 27702786.
Rochet, M.-J. & Trenkel, V.M. (2005) Factors for the variability of discards: assumptions and field evidence. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 62: 224235.
Rose, D.A. (1996) An overview of world trade in sharks and other cartilaginous fishes. A Traffic Network Report. Traffic Network, Cambridge, UK: 106 pp. [www document]. URL http://www.traffic.org/species-reports/traffic_species_fish36.pdf
Rulifson, R.A. (2007) Spiny dogfish mortality induced by gill-net and trawl capture and tag and release. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27: 279285.
Sebastian, H., Haye, P.A. & Shivji, M.S. (2008) Characterization of the pelagic shark-fin trade in north-central Chile by genetic identification and trader surveys. Journal of Fish Biology 73: 22932304.
Shotton, R. (1999) Species identification practices of countries reported landings of chondrichthyan fishes in the FAO nominal catches and landings database. Case studies of the management of elasmobranch fisheries. Part 2, Chapter 29, ed. R. Shotton. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 378(2) [www document]. URL http://www.fao.org/3/a-x2098e/X2098E19.htm
Silva, J.F., Ellis, J.R. & Catchpole, T.L. (2012) Species composition of skates (Rajidae) in commercial fisheries around the British Isles and their discarding patterns. Journal of Fish Biology 80: 16781703.
Smith, P.J. & Benson, P.G. (2001) Biochemical identification of shark fins and fillets from the coastal fisheries in New Zealand. Fishery Bulletin 99: 351355.
Stevens, J.D., Bonfil, R., Dulvy, N.K. & Walker, P.A. (2000) The effects of fishing on sharks, rays and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57: 476494.
Stevenson, D.E. & Lewis, K.A. (2010) Observer-reported skate bycatch in the commercial groundfish fisheries of Alaska. Fishery Bulletin 108: 208217.
Therneau, T.M., Atkinson, B. & Ripley, B. (2013) Rpart: recursive partitioning. R package version 4.1–1 [www document]. URL http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart
Vannuccini, S. (1999) Shark utilization, marketing and trade. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 389, Rome, Italy: 470 pp.
Viana, M., McNally, L., Graham, N., Reid, D.G. & Jackson, A.L. (2013) Ignoring discards biases the assessment of fisheries’ ecological fingerprint. Biology Letters 9: 20130812.
Walker, T.I. (1998) Can shark resources be harvested sustainably? A question revisited with a review of shark fisheries. Marine and Freshwater Research 49: 553572.
Ward-Paige, C.A., Keith, D.M., Worm, B. & Lotze, H.K. (2012) Recovery potential and conservation options for elasmobranchs. Journal of Fish Biology 80: 18441869.
White, W.T. & Dharmadi, (2007) Species and size composition and reproductive biology of rays (Chondrichthyes, Batoidea) caught in target and non-target fisheries in eastern Indonesia. Journal of Fish Biology 70: 18091837.
Worm, B., Davis, B., Kettemer, L., Ward-Paige, C.A., Chapman, D., Heithaus, M.R., Kessel, S.T. & Gruber, S.H. (2013) Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Marine Policy 40: 194204.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

James supplementary material
Table S1-S2

 Word (48 KB)
48 KB

Drivers of retention and discards of elasmobranch non-target catch

  • KELSEY C. JAMES (a1) (a2), REBECCA L. LEWISON (a2), PETER W. DILLINGHAM (a3) (a4), K. ALEXANDRA CURTIS (a5) and JEFFREY E. MOORE (a6)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed