Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:25:33.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Himalayan Mountaineering Expedition Garbage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Ross Cullen
Ross Cullen
Affiliation:
Lecturer, Department of Economics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; currently Visiting Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Expedition garbage is an unfortunate by-product of Himalayan mountaineering expeditions. High transport costs, lack of concern amongst climbers, and lack of direction by authorities, results in squalid garbage heaps around mountain campsites. Growth in numbers of expeditions, climbers, and trekkers, to the Himalaya necessitates prompt action to prevent despoliation of those areas.

Such despoliation of campsites by inadequate treatment or unsatisfactory disposal practices cannot be halted by reliance on improved climber behaviour alone. Host-country authorities must develop and enforce more comprehensive guidelines and policies for garbage disposal than currently prevail. A combination of burning and transport to pits off-site seems likely to be typically the best disposal practice to follow. A combination of change in expedition behaviour, provision of leadership in garbage disposal, and use of environmental protection levies, seems necessary to combat the problem of growing squalor at campsites and expanding desecration of surrounding areas.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , Winter 1986 , pp. 293 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartram, G. (1985). Rubbish on the Rongbuk Glacier. American Alpine Journal, 27, p. 339.Google Scholar
Beghin, P. (1986). Everest, north face attempt. American Alpine Journal, 28, pp. 297–8.Google Scholar
Cullen, R. (in press). Expeditions, efficiency, ethics and the environment. Leisure Studies.Google Scholar
Fairley, B. (1984). Mountaineering and the ethics of technique. Canadian Alpine Journal, 74, pp. 49–52.Google Scholar
Jefferies, B.E. (1982). Sagarmatha National Park: the impact of tourism on the Himalayas. Ambio, 11(5), pp. 274–81.Google Scholar
Pawson, I.G., Sanford, D.D., Adams, V.A. & Nurbu, M. (1984). Growth of tourism in Nepal's Everest region: Impact on the physical environment and structure of human settlements. Mountain Research and Development, 4(3), pp. 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, L.W. (1981). Mountains and Man. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA: xxi + 506 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Price, M.F. (1985). Impacts of recreational activities on alpine vegetation in Western North America. Mountain Research and Development, 5(3), pp. 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, A. (1985). Changing values. Alpine Journal, 90, pp. 116–20.Google Scholar
Salisbury, R.A. (1985). First Sagarmatha Preservation Expedition. American Alpine Journal, 27, pp. 261–2.Google Scholar
Tejada-Flores, L. (1978). Games climbers play. Pp. 19–27 in The Games Climbers Play (Ed. Wilson, K.). Diadem Books, London, England, UK: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Town, J. (1986). Death and the art of database management. Mountain, 110, pp. 42–5.Google Scholar
Unsworth, W. (1981). Everest. Allen Lane, London, England, UK: xiv + 578 pp. illustr.Google Scholar