Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Legislative Confrontation of Groupthink in US Natural Resource Agencies

  • James J. Kennedy (a1)
Extract

Within the apparent strength of proud, successful, cohesive agencies are often found characteristics that inhibit their ability to adapt successfully in an environment of change. Organizations can be so successful that they feel invulnerable to public petition. They can stereotype, and dismiss as uninformed ‘outsiders’ or biased trouble-makers, any others who criticize them. Janis (1967) has described such organizational tendencies as groupthink behaviour—where proud and successful, professional organizations such as the USDA-Forest Service (USFS), consider themselves superior to the public, and where any external criticism is filtered, rationalized, and stereotyped to minimize the need for organizational introspection and change.

This article looks at how groupthink tendencies were a normal, understandable part of USFS behaviour in the 1950–60s—and how these tendencies inhibited its adaptation to a post-industrial American society that was increasingly concerned with forest recreational and amenity values. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 1970) was the first of several laws that directly confronted the utilitarian, developmental values and the groupthink tendencies in federal natural resource agencies. Responding to NEPA (1970) and other legislative and policy changes of that era, the USFS has latterly become a much more sexually and professionally diverse agency, that is more open to public input than formerly. This volte-face has reduced the probability of groupthink operating in the agency, and consequently improved the latter's prospects of a useful and equitable future.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Barney, D.R. (1972). The Last Stand—Ralph Nadar's Study Group Report on the National Forests. Grossman, New York, NY, USA: xxi + 185 pp., illustr.
Behan, R.W. (1981). RPA/NFMA—time to punt. Journal of Forestry, 79(12), pp. 802–5.
Bultena, G.L. & Hendee, J.C. (1972). Foresters on forest policy. Journal of Forestry, 70(6), pp. 337–42.
Clarke, J.N. & McCool, D. (1985). Staking Out the Terrain—Power Differentials Among Natural Resource Management Agencies. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, USA: vii + 189 pp.
Colfer, C.J.P. & Colfer, A.M. (1978). Inside Bushler Bay: lifeways in counterpoint. Rural Sociology, 43(2), pp. 204–20.
Cortner, H.J. & Schweitzer, D.L. (1981). Institutional limits to national public planning for forest resources: The resources planning act. Natural Resources Journal, 21(2), pp. 203–22.
Cross, G.M. (1987). Continuing education in natural resources: Needs and opportunities. Transactions of North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 52, pp. 691–6. (Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C., USA: 294 pp.)
Culhane, P. J. (1981). Public Lands Politics. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA: xv + 398 pp.
Cutler, M.R. (1982). What kind of wildlifers will be needed in the 1980s? Wildlife Society Bulletin, 10(1), pp. 75–9.
Dana, S.T. & Fairfax, S.K. (1980). Forest and Range Policy. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA: xviii + 458 pp.
Duerr, W.A. (1986). Forestry's upheaval—are advances in western civilizations redefining the profession? Journal of Forestry, 84(1), pp. 20–6.
Frankel, C. (1969). Social values and professional values. Journal of Education for Social Work, 5(3), pp. 2935
Frome, M. (1962). Whose Woods Are These: The Story of the National Forests. Doubleday, Garden City, NJ, USA: xvi + 258 pp., illustr.
Frome, M. (1974). Battle for the Wilderness. Praeger, New York, NY, USA: xii + 246 pp., illustr.
Gold, K.A. (1982). Managing for success: A comparison of the private and public sectors. Public Administration Review, 42(6), pp. 568–75.
Gulick, L.H. (1951). American Forest Policy. Duell, Sloan & Pearce, New York, NY, USA: xii + 252 pp., illustr.
Hays, S. (1959). Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: xv + 248 pp.
Hirschman, A.D. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty—Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: vii + 162 pp.
Janis, I.L. (1967). Victims of Groupthink. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, USA: vii + 276 pp., illustr.
Kaufman, H. (1960). The Forest Ranger. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA: xvii + 259 pp., illustr.
Kennedy, J.J. (1985 a). Conceiving forest management as providing for current and future social value. Forest Ecology and Management, 13(4), pp. 121–32.
Kennedy, J.J. (1985 b). Integrating Professional Diversity into Mainstream Forest Service Organizational Culture. Paper Presented at Forest Service (Reg. 4) Management Conference, Boise, Idaho, USA, 5–7 11 1985: 8 pp. (mimeogr.).
Kennedy, J.J. (1986). Early career development of Forest Service fisheries managers. Fisheries, 11(4), pp. 813.
Kennedy, J.J. & Mincolla, J.A. (1982). Career Evolution of Young 400-series U.S. Forest Service Professionals (Career Development Project Report 1). Department of Forest Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA: 86 pp.
Kennedy, J.J. & Mincolla, J.A. (1985). Early career development of fisheries and wildlife biologists in two Forest Service regions. Transactions of North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 50, pp. 425–35. (Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC, USA.)
Leman, C.K. (1981). The Forest Ranger Revisited: Administrative Behavior in the U.S. Forest Service in the 1980s. Paper Presented at Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, New York, NY, USA: 12 pp. (mimeogr.).
McGeary, M.N. (1960). Gifford Pinchot: Forester-Politician. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA: xii + 186 pp.
Mazmanian, D.A. & Nienabor, J. (1979). Can Organizations Change? Environmental Protection, Citizen Participation and the Corps of Engineers. Brookings Institute, Washington, DC, USA: x + 220 pp.
May, B.E. & Davis, B. (1983). Recognition of Fish and Wildlife Habitat as an Important Resource on National Forests. Idaho Biologists' Workshop, Challis National Forest, Challis, Idaho, USA: 22 pp. (mimeogr.).
Miller, M.C. & Gale, R.P. (1986). Professional styles of federal forest and marine fisheries resource managers. Journal of Fisheries Management, 6(2), pp. 141–8.
Mohai, P. (1987). Rational decision-making in the planning process: Some empirical evidence from RARE II. Environmental Law, 17(3), pp. 507–56.
NEPA (1970). National Environment Policy Act (P.L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 852) 42nd Congressional Records, Washington, DC, USA.
Pinchot, G. (1910). The Fight for Conservation. Doubleday, Page & Co., Garden City, NY, USA: xi + 152 pp., illustr.
Pinchot, G. (1928). The Power Monopoly — Its Make-up and Its Menace. Milford. Pennsylvania, USA: xii + 256 pp., illustr.
Reich, C. (1962). Bureaucracy and the Forests. Center for Study of Democratic Institutions, Santa Barbara, California, USA: 12 pp.
Schiff, A.L. (1962). Fire and Water: Scientific Heresy in the Forest Service. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: ix + 218 pp.
Shannon, M.A. (1984). New Dimensions in the Policy and Legal Aspects of Forest Land Management. Paper Delivered at Society of American Foresters Annual Conference, Quebec City, Canada, 9 pp. (mimeogr.).
Speer, A. (1981). Inside the Third Reich. Collier Books, New York, NY, USA: xx + 248 pp., illustr.
Steen, H.K. (1976). The U.S. Forest Service—A History. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA: xvi + 356 pp., illustr.
Thomas, J.W. (1986). Effectiveness: The hallmark of the natural resource management professional. Transactions of North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, 50, pp. 2738. (Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC, USA.)
Thomson, J.C. Jun., (1968). How could Vietnam happen? An autopsy. Atlantic Monthly (04), pp. 4753.
Twight, B.W. (1983). Organizational Values and Political Power: The Forest Service versus the Olympic National Park. Pennsylvania State University Press, State College, Pennsylvania, USA: xii + 139 pp.
Twight, B.W. (1985). The Forest Service mission: A case of family fidelity. Women in Forestry, 7(3), pp. 57.
USDA-Forest Service (1907). The Use of the National Forests. USDA-Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA: 42 pp., illustr.
USDA-Forest Service (1985). Working Together for Multipleuse — Integrated Resource Management. USDA-Forest Service, Eastern Region, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA: 27 pp., illustr.
USDA-Forest Service (1986). Caring for the Land and Serving People (FS-402). USDA-Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA: 5 pp.
USDA-Forest Service (1987). SPIRIT of the Forest. USDA-Forest-Service, Eastern Region, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA: 11 pp., illustr.
U.S. Senate (1970). A University View of the Forest Service (Bolle report: Senate Doc. No. 115). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 34.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 8 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 148 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.