This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
K. Andrews & B. Edwards (2004) Advocacy organization in the US political process. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 479–506.
S.R. Arnstein (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35: 216–224.
L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (1976 ) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press.
J. Bourgon (2008) The future of public service: a search for a new balance. The Australian Journal of Public Administration 67: 390–404.
L. Crase (2008) Water Policy in Australia. Washington, DC, USA: Resources for the Future Press.
L.R. Gomez-Mejia , D.B. Balkin & R. Cardy (2008) Management: People, Performance, Change. Third edition. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill.
C. Harrington , A. Curtis & R. Black (2008) Locating communities in natural resource management. Journal of Planning and Policy 10 (2): 199–215.
E. Kals & Y. Russell (2001) Individuals’ conceptions of justice and their potential for explaining pro-environmental decision making. Social Justice Research 14: 347–384.
R. Kingsford (2000) Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecology 25: 109–27.
J. Konow (2003) Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature 41: 1188–1239.
J. Konow (2005) Blind spots: the effects of information and stakes on fairness biases. Social Justice Research 18: 349–390.
P.R. LaChapelle , S.F. McCool & M.F. Patterson (2003) Barriers to effective natural resource planning in a messy world. Society and Natural Resources 16: 473–490.
A. Ladson & B. Finlayson (2002) Rhetoric and reality in the allocation of water: a case study of the Goulburn. River Research and Applications 18: 555–568.
R.L. Lawrence , S.E. Daniels & G.H. Stankey (1997) Procedural justice and public involvement in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 10: 577–589.
E.A. Lind & T.R. Tyler (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press.
Murray Irrigation Limited (2006) Annual Report, Deniliquin, NSW, Australia: Murray Irrigation Limited
B.E. Nancarrow & G.J Syme (2001) Challenges in implementing justice research in the allocation of natural resources. Social Justice Research 14: 441–452.
J. Pigram (2006) Australia's Water Resources: From Use to Management. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
R. Plummer & J FitzGibbon (2004) Some observations on the terminology in co-operative environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 70: 63–72.
L.J. Skitka (2009) Exploring the ‘lost and found’ of justice theory and research. Social Justice Research 22: 98–116.
L.J. Skitka & J. Crosby (2003) Trends in the socio-psychological study of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7: 282–285.
A. Slater & O.W. Pederson (2009) Environmental justice: lessons on definition and delivery from Scotland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52: 797–812.
P.D. Smith & M.H. McDonough (2001) Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources 14: 239–249.
J. Tisdell (2003) Equity and social justice in water doctrines. Social Justice Research 16: 401–416.
E.J. Trickett (2009) Multilevel community based culturally situated inventions and community impact: an ecological perspective. American Journal of Community Psychology 43: 257–266.
R. van der Brugge , J. Rotmans & D. Loorbach (2005) The transition in Dutch water management. Regional Environmental Change 5: 164–176.
K. Wade-Benzoni , A. Tenbrunsel & M. Bazerman (1996) Egocentric interpretations of fairness in asymmetric environmental social dilemmas: explaining harvesting behavior and the role of communication. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 67: 111–126.
H. Wilke (1991) Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. European Review of Social Psychology 2: 165–187.