Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 16
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Zulu, Leo 2013. Bringing People Back into Protected Forests in Developing Countries: Insights from Co-Management in Malawi. Sustainability, Vol. 5, Issue. 5, p. 1917.


    Sjah, Taslim and Baldwin, Claudia 2014. Options for future effective water management in Lombok: A multi-level nested framework. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 519, p. 2448.


    Baral, Nabin 2012. Empirical analysis of factors explaining local governing bodies’ trust for administering agencies in community-based conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 103, p. 41.


    Green, Kathryn E. 2016. A political ecology of scaling: Struggles over power, land and authority. Geoforum, Vol. 74, p. 88.


    Prager, Katrin 2015. Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 12, p. 59.


    Waylen, Kerry Ann Fischer, Anke McGowan, Philip J. K. and Milner-Gulland, E. J. 2013. Deconstructing Community for Conservation: Why Simple Assumptions are Not Sufficient. Human Ecology, Vol. 41, Issue. 4, p. 575.


    Léopold, Marc Beckensteiner, Jennifer Kaltavara, Jeremie Raubani, Jason and Caillon, Sophie 2013. Community-based management of near-shore fisheries in Vanuatu: What works?. Marine Policy, Vol. 42, p. 167.


    Molares, Soledad and Ladio, Ana 2012. Mapuche perceptions and conservation of Andean Nothofagus forests and their medicinal plants: a case study from a rural community in Patagonia, Argentina. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 1079.


    Baral, Nabin 2013. What Makes Grassroots Conservation Organizations Resilient? An Empirical Analysis of Diversity, Organizational Memory, and the Number of Leaders. Environmental Management, Vol. 51, Issue. 3, p. 738.


    Lauvie, Anne Couix, Nathalie and Verrier, Etienne 2014. No Development, No Conservation: Elements from the Conservation of Farm Animal Genetic Resources. Society & Natural Resources, Vol. 27, Issue. 12, p. 1331.


    Cinner, J. E. McClanahan, T. R. MacNeil, M. A. Graham, N. A. J. Daw, T. M. Mukminin, A. Feary, D. A. Rabearisoa, A. L. Wamukota, A. Jiddawi, N. Campbell, S. J. Baird, A. H. Januchowski-Hartley, F. A. Hamed, S. Lahari, R. Morove, T. and Kuange, J. 2012. Comanagement of coral reef social-ecological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 109, Issue. 14, p. 5219.


    ROMERO, DAVID OLIVERO, JESÚS and REAL, RAIMUNDO 2013. Comparative assessment of different methods for using land-cover variables for distribution modelling of Salamandra salamandra longirotris. Environmental Conservation, Vol. 40, Issue. 01, p. 48.


    Sladonja, Barbara Brščić, Kristina Poljuha, Danijela Fanuko, Neda and Grgurev, Marin 2012. Introduction of Participatory Conservation in Croatia, Residents’ Perceptions: A Case Study from the Istrian Peninsula. Environmental Management, Vol. 49, Issue. 6, p. 1115.


    Thondhlana, Gladman Shackleton, Sheona and Blignaut, James 2015. Local institutions, actors, and natural resource governance in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park and surrounds, South Africa. Land Use Policy, Vol. 47, p. 121.


    WAYLEN, K. A. HASTINGS, E. J. BANKS, E. A. HOLSTEAD, K. L. IRVINE, R. J. and BLACKSTOCK, K. L. 2014. The Need to Disentangle Key Concepts from Ecosystem-Approach Jargon. Conservation Biology, Vol. 28, Issue. 5, p. 1215.


    Aziz, Sheema A. Clements, Gopalasamy R. Rayan, D. M. and Sankar, Preetha 2013. Why conservationists should be concerned about natural resource legislation affecting indigenous peoples’ rights: lessons from Peninsular Malaysia. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 639.


    ×

Reflecting on the next generation of models for community-based natural resources management

Abstract

Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) has been a pervasive paradigm in conservation circles for three decades. Despite many potentially attractive attributes it has been extensively critiqued from both ecological and sociological perspectives with respect to theory and practice (for example Leach et al. 1999; Berkes 2004; Fabricius et al. 2004; Blaikie 2006). Nonetheless, many successful examples exist, although an equal number have seemingly not met expectations. Is this because of poor implementation or rather a generally flawed model? If the criteria and conditions for success are so onerous that relatively few projects or situations are likely to qualify, what then is the value of the model? The questions thus become: how and what can we learn from the past theory and practice to develop a new generation of flexible, locally responsive and implementable CBNRM models, and what are likely to be the attributes of such models?

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Reflecting on the next generation of models for community-based natural resources management
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Reflecting on the next generation of models for community-based natural resources management
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Reflecting on the next generation of models for community-based natural resources management
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Agrawal & E. Ostrom (2001) Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society 29: 485514.

Z.T. Ashenafi & N. Leader-Williams (2005) Indigenous common property resource management in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Human Ecology 33: 539563.

N. Baral & M.J. Stern (2010) Looking back and looking ahead: local empowerment and governance in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environmental Conservation DOI: 10.1017/S0376892909990269.

F. Berkes (2004) Re-thinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621630.

P.M. Blaikie (2006) Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resources management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34: 19421957.

K.E. Brandon & M. Wells (1992) Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Development 20: 557570.

S.V. Briggs (2006) Integrating policy and science in natural resources: why so difficult. Ecological Management and Restoration 7: 3739.

B.A. Byers , R.A. Cunliffe & A.T. Hudak (2001) Linking the conservation of culture and nature: a case study of sacred forests in Zimbabwe. Human Ecology 29: 187218.

C.A. Kull (2002) Empowering pyromaniacs in Madagascar: ideology and legitimacy in community-based natural resource management. Development and Change 33: 5778.

M. Leach , R. Mearns & I. Scoones (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development 27: 225247.

D.R. Leal (1998) Community-run fisheries: avoiding the ‘tragedy of the commons’. Population and Environment 19: 225245.

A. Lepp & S. Holland (2006) A comparison of attitudes toward state-led conservation and community-based conservation in the village of Bigodi, Uganda. Society and Natural Resources 19: 609623.

M.S. Reed (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 24172431.



R. Taylor (2009) Community based natural resource management in Zimbabwe: the experience of CAMPFIRE. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 25632583.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×