Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 150
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Arul Manikandan, N. Vinoth Kumar, R. Pugazhenthi, G. and Pakshirajan, K. 2016. Platform Chemical Biorefinery.

    Bicalho, Tereza Bessou, Cécile and Pacca, Sergio A. 2016. Land use change within EU sustainability criteria for biofuels: The case of oil palm expansion in the Brazilian Amazon. Renewable Energy, Vol. 89, p. 588.

    Cong, Rong-Gang and Termansen, Mette 2016. A bio-economic analysis of a sustainable agricultural transition using green biorefinery. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 571, p. 153.

    Dias, Lívia C. P. Pimenta, Fernando M. Santos, Ana B. Costa, Marcos H. and Ladle, Richard J. 2016. Patterns of land use, extensification, and intensification of Brazilian agriculture. Global Change Biology, Vol. 22, Issue. 8, p. 2887.

    Gamondès Moyano, Isabel M. Morgan, Richard K. and Martínez Pastur, Guillermo 2016. Reshaping forest management in southern Patagonia: a qualitative assessment. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, Vol. 35, Issue. 1, p. 37.

    Garrett, Rachael D. and Rausch, Lisa L. 2016. Green for gold: social and ecological tradeoffs influencing the sustainability of the Brazilian soy industry. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 461.

    Juen, L. Cunha, E. J. Carvalho, F. G. Ferreira, M. C. Begot, T. O. Andrade, A. L. Shimano, Y. Leão, H. Pompeu, P. S. and Montag, L. F. A. 2016. Effects of Oil Palm Plantations on the Habitat Structure and Biota of Streams in Eastern Amazon. River Research and Applications,

    Lenschow, Andrea Newig, Jens and Challies, Edward 2016. Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 136.

    Lobón-Cerviá, J. Mazzoni, R. and Rezende, C. F. 2016. Effects of riparian forest removal on the trophic dynamics of a Neotropical stream fish assemblage. Journal of Fish Biology, Vol. 89, Issue. 1, p. 50.

    McKay, Ben and Colque, Gonzalo 2016. Bolivia's soy complex: the development of ‘productive exclusion’. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 583.

    Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho, Mateo 2016. Soybean agri-food systems dynamics and the diversity of farming styles on the agricultural frontier in Mato Grosso, Brazil. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 419.

    Miguel Ayala, Laura van Eupen, Michiel Zhang, Guoping Pérez-Soba, Marta Martorano, Lucieta G. Lisboa, Leila S. and Beltrao, Norma E. 2016. Impact of agricultural expansion on water footprint in the Amazon under climate change scenarios. Science of The Total Environment,

    Pegas, Fernanda de Vasconcellos and Castley, J. Guy 2016. Private reserves in Brazil: Distribution patterns, logistical challenges, and conservation contributions. Journal for Nature Conservation, Vol. 29, p. 14.

    Plath, Mirco Moser, Christine Bailis, Rob Brandt, Patric Hirsch, Heidi Klein, Alexandra-Maria Walmsley, David and von Wehrden, Henrik 2016. A novel bioenergy feedstock in Latin America? Cultivation potential of Acrocomia aculeata under current and future climate conditions. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 91, p. 186.

    Reynolds, Jason Wesson, Kathryn Desbiez, Arnaud Ochoa-Quintero, Jose and Leimgruber, Peter 2016. Using Remote Sensing and Random Forest to Assess the Conservation Status of Critical Cerrado Habitats in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Land, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 12.

    Sloan, Sean 2016. Tropical Forest Gain and Interactions amongst Agents of Forest Change. Forests, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 55.

    Adams, Ryan Thomas 2015. Neoliberal Environmentality among Elites: Becoming “Responsible Producers” in Santarém, Brazil. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 84.

    Aldrich, Stephen P. 2015. Decision-making and the environment in the Amazon Land War. Journal of Land Use Science, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 38.

    Barcelos, Edson Rios, Sara de Almeida Cunha, Raimundo N. V. Lopes, Ricardo Motoike, Sérgio Y. Babiychuk, Elena Skirycz, Aleksandra and Kushnir, Sergei 2015. Oil palm natural diversity and the potential for yield improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 6,

    Barni, Paulo Eduardo Fearnside, Philip Martin and Graça, Paulo Maurício Lima de Alencastro 2015. Simulating Deforestation and Carbon Loss in Amazonia: Impacts in Brazil’s Roraima State from Reconstructing Highway BR-319 (Manaus-Porto Velho). Environmental Management, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 259.


Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil

  • Philip M. Fearnside (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2002

Soybeans represent a recent and powerful threat to tropical biodiversity in Brazil. Developing effective strategies to contain and minimize the environmental impact of soybean cultivation requires understanding of both the forces that drive the soybean advance and the many ways that soybeans and their associated infrastructure catalyse destructive processes. The present paper presents an up-to-date review of the advance of soybeans in Brazil, its environmental and social costs and implications for development policy. Soybeans are driven by global market forces, making them different from many of the land-use changes that have dominated the scene in Brazil so far, particularly in Amazonia. Soybeans are much more damaging than other crops because they justify massive transportation infrastructure projects that unleash a chain of events leading to destruction of natural habitats over wide areas in addition to what is directly cultivated for soybeans. The capacity of global markets to absorb additional production represents the most likely limit to the spread of soybeans, although Brazil may someday come to see the need for discouraging rather than subsidizing this crop because many of its effects are unfavourable to national interests, including severe concentration of land tenure and income, expulsion of population to Amazonian frontier, and gold-mining, as well as urban areas, and the opportunity cost of substantial drains on government resources. The multiple impacts of soybean expansion on biodiversity and other development considerations have several implications for policy: (1) protected areas need to be created in advance of soybean frontiers, (2) elimination of the many subsidies that speed soybean expansion beyond what would occur otherwise from market forces is to be encouraged, (3) studies to assess the costs of social and environmental impacts associated with soybean expansion are urgently required, and (4) the environmental-impact regulatory system requires strengthening, including mechanisms for commitments not to implant specific infrastructure projects that are judged to have excessive impacts.

Corresponding author
Correspondence: Dr Philip M. Fearnside Tel: +55 92 643 1822 Fax: +55 92 642 8909 e-mail:
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *