Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 16
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bunnefeld, Nils and Milner-Gulland, E. J. 2016. Antelope Conservation.

    Naidoo, Robin Weaver, L. Chris Diggle, Richard W. Matongo, Greenwell Stuart-Hill, Greg and Thouless, Chris 2016. Complementary benefits of tourism and hunting to communal conservancies in Namibia. Conservation Biology, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 628.

    Ulambayar, Tungalag Fernández-Giménez, María E. Baival, Batkhishig and Batjav, Batbuyan 2016. Social Outcomes of Community-based Rangeland Management in Mongolian Steppe Ecosystems. Conservation Letters,

    Kahler, Jessica S. and Gore, Meredith L. 2015. Local perceptions of risk associated with poaching of wildlife implicated in human-wildlife conflicts in Namibia. Biological Conservation, Vol. 189, p. 49.

    Moswete, Naomi and Thapa, Brijesh 2015. Factors that influence support for community-based ecotourism in the rural communities adjacent to the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, Botswana. Journal of Ecotourism, Vol. 14, Issue. 2-3, p. 243.

    Silva, Julie A. and Motzer, Nicole 2015. Hybrid Uptakes of Neoliberal Conservation in Namibian Tourism-based Development. Development and Change, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 48.

    Silva, and Khatiwada, 2014. Transforming Conservation into Cash? Nature Tourism in Southern Africa. Africa Today, Vol. 61, Issue. 1, p. 17.

    Silva, Julie A. and Mosimane, Alfons 2014. “How Could I Live Here and Not Be a Member?”: Economic Versus Social Drivers of Participation in Namibian Conservation Programs. Human Ecology, Vol. 42, Issue. 2, p. 183.

    van Gils, Hein Siegl, Gerhard and Mark Bennett, Rohan 2014. The living commons of West Tyrol, Austria: Lessons for land policy and land administration. Land Use Policy, Vol. 38, p. 16.

    KAHLER, JESSICA S. ROLOFF, GARY J. and GORE, MEREDITH L. 2013. Poaching Risks in Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Conservation Biology, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 177.

    Stringer, Lindsay C. and Dougill, Andrew J. 2013. Channelling science into policy: Enabling best practices from research on land degradation and sustainable land management in dryland Africa. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 114, p. 328.

    Thapa Karki, Shova 2013. Do protected areas and conservation incentives contribute to sustainable livelihoods? A case study of Bardia National Park, Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 128, p. 988.

    Egoh, Benis N. O'Farrell, Patrick J. Charef, Aymen Josephine Gurney, Leigh Koellner, Thomas Nibam Abi, Henry Egoh, Mody and Willemen, Louise 2012. An African account of ecosystem service provision: Use, threats and policy options for sustainable livelihoods. Ecosystem Services, Vol. 2, p. 71.

    Kahler, Jessica S. and Gore, Meredith L. 2012. Beyond the cooking pot and pocket book: Factors influencing noncompliance with wildlife poaching rules. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 103.

    MORSE, STEPHEN and MCNAMARA, NORA 2012. Trade-offs in the exploration of Sustainable Livelihoods: experience from a micro-credit intervention in Nigeria. The Geographical Journal, Vol. 178, Issue. 2, p. 162.

    Snyman, Susan 2012. Ecotourism joint ventures between the private sector and communities: An updated analysis of the Torra Conservancy and Damaraland Camp partnership, Namibia. Tourism Management Perspectives, Vol. 4, p. 127.


The livelihood impacts of the Namibian community based natural resource management programme: a meta-synthesis

  • HELEN SUICH (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 08 June 2010

Community based natural resource management (CBNRM) programmes aim to achieve the joint objectives of biodiversity conservation and improved rural livelihoods by providing incentives to sustainably manage relevant resources. Since 1998, more than 50 natural resource management institutions, known as conservancies, have been established in order to manage wildlife resources, on communal lands in Namibia. The national programme is often cited as a CBNRM success; however, despite its rapid spread, there are few systematically collected or analysed household-level data which demonstrate the long-term ecological, social and economic impacts of Namibian programme. A meta-synthesis was undertaken to determine the range of positive and negative livelihood impacts resulting from CBNRM programme activities in two key regions, and the factors affecting how these impacts have been felt by households or individuals. Impacts were categorized according to any changes in access to and/or returns from the five key assets of the sustainable livelihoods framework, namely financial, human, natural, physical and social assets. Positive and negative impacts were felt on financial, human, natural and social assets; only positive impacts were identified as affecting physical assets. Individual- and household-level impacts differed depending on the specific activities implemented locally and, according to the duration, frequency and timing of the impacts, the circumstances and preferences of households and their access to particular activities and consequent impacts. If a greater understanding of the extent and importance of different impacts is to be gained in the future, more rigorous and comprehensive data collection and analysis will need to be undertaken. Analyses will need to consider the whole range of activities implemented, both the benefits and costs associated with these different activities, and will also need to provide contextual information to allow the relative importance of impacts resulting from CBNRM activities to be better understood.

Corresponding author
*Correspondence: Helen Suich e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

W. Adams (2004) Against Extinction. The Story of Conservation. London, UK: Earthscan.

A. Agrawal & C.C. Gibson (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27 (4): 629649.

C. Bair & J. Haworth (2005) Doctoral student attrition and persistence: a meta-synthesis of research. In: Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, ed. J.C. Smart , pp. 481534. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

P. Blaikie (2006) Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34 (11): 19421957.

T. Bondas & E.O.C. Hall (2007) Challenges in approaching meta-synthesis research. Qualitative Health Research 17 (1): 113121.

D. Carney , M. Drinkwater , T. Rusinow , K. Neefjes , S. Wanmali & N. Singh (1999) Livelihood Approaches Compared. A Brief Comparison of the Livelihoods Approaches of the UK Department for International Development, CARE, Oxfam and the United Nations Development Programme. London, UK: DFID.

L. Emerton (1998) The nature of benefits and the benefits of nature: why wildlife conservation has not economically benefited communities in Africa. Community Conservation in Africa Working Paper No.5/1998, IDPM, Manchester, UK.

P.J. Ferraro (2009) Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. New Directions for Evaluation 2009 (122): 7584.

P. Ferraro & S. Pattanayak (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4 (4): 482488.

D.L. Finfgeld (2003) Meta-synthesis: the state of the art – so far. Qualitative Health Research 13 (7): 893904.

K. Ghimire & M. Pimbert , eds (1997) Social Change and Conservation: Environmental Politics and Impacts of National Parks and Protected Areas. London, UK: Earthscan.

D. Hulme & M. Murphree (1999) Communities, wildlife and the ‘new conservation’ in Africa. Journal of International Development 11 (2): 277–85.

IIED (1994) Whose Eden? An Overview of Community Approaches to Wildlife Management. London, UK: IIED.

M. Jacobsohn & G. Owen-Smith (2003) Integrating conservation and development. A Namibian case study. Nomadic Peoples 7 (1): 92109.

B. Jones (2006) Case studies on successful southern African NRM initiatives and their impacts on poverty and governance. Country study: Namibia. Promoting integrated natural resource management as a means to combat desertification: the Living In A Finite Environment (LIFE) project and the #Khoadi//Hoas Conservancy, Namibia. Paper prepared for the United States Agency for International Development and the IUCN Transboundary Protected Areas Research Initiative [www document]. URL

S. Mulonga and C. Murphy (2003) Spending the money: The experience of conservancy benefit distribution in Namibia up to mid-2003. Research Discussion Paper No.63 Windhoek: DEA/MET.

R.P. Neumann (2005) Model, panacea, or exception? Contextualizing CAMPFIRE and related programs in Africa. In: Communities and Conservation. Histories and Politics of Community Based Natural Resource Management, ed. J.P. Brosius , A.L. Tsing & C. Zerner , pp. 177193, Walnut Creek, CA, USA: Alta Mira Press.

K. Nott & B. Curtis (2005) Aromatic resins from Commiphora trees. Roan News. Wildlife Society of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.

D.G. Ogbaharya (2006) A capability theory of CBNRM: the case of Namibia's communal conservancy programme. Paper prepared for the International Conference of the Human Development and Capability Association, the International Conference of the Human Development and Capability Association on ‘Freedom and Justice’, Groningen, The Netherlands, August 29-September 1, 2006 [www document]. URL

S. Pagiola , A. Arcenas & G. Platais (2005) Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development 33 (2): 237253.

S. Shackleton , C. Shackleton , T. Netshiluvhi , B. Geach , A. Ballance & D. Fairbanks (2002) Use patterns and value of savannah resources in three rural villages in South Africa. Economic Botany 56 (2): 130146.

S. Thorne , L. Jensen , M.H. Kearney , G. Noblit & M. Sandelowski (2004) Qualitative meta-synthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research 14 (10): 13421365.

D. Walsh & S. Downe (2005) Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50 (2): 204211.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Suich Supplementary Material

 Unknown (62 KB)
62 KB