Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

To pay or not to pay? Monitoring performance and enforcing conditionality when paying for forest conservation in Mexico

  • JORDI HONEY-ROSÉS (a1), JOSÉ LÓPEZ-GARCÍA (a2), EDUARDO RENDÓN-SALINAS (a1), ARMANDO PERALTA-HIGUERA (a2) and CARLOS GALINDO-LEAL (a1) (a3)...

Summary

Paying landowners to conserve forests is a promising new strategy to protect biodiversity and ecosystem services. However to succeed with this approach, programme managers need reliable monitoring data to make informed payment decisions. This includes withholding payment from landowners who do not meet conservation objectives. The monitoring method used for the Monarch Butterfly Conservation Fund compared aerial photographs and conducted field sampling to identify forest changes. The comparison of aerial photographs showed that 161 hectares of forest were degraded in the central core zone of the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve in Mexico between 2001 and 2003. As a result, payment was withheld from one of 13 landowners. Analysis of high resolution (0.6 m) digital aerial photographs did not detect finer scale changes, despite obtaining an average pixel resolution 1000 times greater than Landsat satellite imagery. This suggests that current payment for ecosystem services programmes are underestimating environmental change and overpaying non-compliant participants. In addition, selecting a decision rule to enforce payment conditionality raised new questions about how much ecosystem degradation should be permitted before withholding payment. Sound decisions about withholding payment cannot be developed until the marginal value of ecosystem services is better understood. Until then, payment thresholds can be based on specific policy objectives.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Correspondence: Jordi Honey-Rosés, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois, 111 Temple Buell Hall, 611 Taft Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, USA e-mail: jhoneyr2@illinois.edu

References

Hide All
Adams, W.M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B. & Wolmer, W. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306: 1146–9.
Alonso-Mejía, A., Montesinos-Patiño, E., Rendón-Salinas, E., Brower, L.P. & Oyama, K. (1998) Influence of forest canopy closure on rates of bird predation on overwintering Monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus L. Biological Conservation 85: 151159.
Andam, K., Ferraro, P.J., Pfaff, A., Sánchez-Azofeifa, A.G. & Robalino, J.A. (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings on the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 105: 16089–16084.
Anderson, J.B. & Brower, L.P. (1996) Freeze-protection of overwintering monarch butterflies in México: critical role of the forest as a blanket and an umbrella. Ecological Entomology 21: 107116.
Bishop, J. & Landell-Mills, N. (2002) Forest environmental services: an overview. In: Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, ed. Pagiola, S., Bishop, J. & Landell-Mills, N., pp. 1535. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.
Bojórquez-Tapia, L.A., Brower, L.P., Castilleja, G., Sánchez-Colón, S., Hernández, M., Calvert, W., Diaz, S., Gómez-Priego, P., Alcantar, G., Melgarejo, E.D., Solares, M.J., Gutiérrez, L. & Juárez, M.D.L. (2003) Mapping expert knowledge: redesigning the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve. Conservation Biology 17: 367–79.
Boyer, C.R. (2005) Contested terrain: forestry regimes and community responses in northeastern Michoacán, 1940–2000. In: The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes, ed. Bray, D.B., Merino-Pérez, L. & Barry, D., pp. 2748. Austin, TX, USA: University of Texas Press.
Bray, D.B., Merino-Pérez, L. & Barry, D., eds (2005) The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes. Austin, TX, USA: University of Texas Press.
Brower, L.P. (1977) Monarch migration. Natural History 86: 4053.
Brower, L.P. (1999) Biological necessities for the monarch butterfly overwintering in relation to the oyamel forest ecosystem in Mexico. In: 1997 North American Conference on the Monarch Butterfly, ed. Hoth, J., Merino, L., Oberhauser, K., Pisanty, I., Price, S. & Wilkison, T., pp. 1128. Montreal, Canada: The Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
Brower, L.P., Castilleja, G., Peralta, A., Lopez-Garcia, J., Bojorquez-Tapia, L., Diaz, S., Marmolejo, D. & Missrie, M. (2002) Quantitative changes in forest quality in a principal overwintering area of the monarch butterfly in Mexico 1971–1999. Conservation Biology 2: 346359.
Brower, L.P., Kust, D.R., Rendón-Salinas, E., García-Serrano, E., Kust, K.R., Miller, J., Fernández del Rey, C. & Pape, K. (2004) Catastrophic winter storm mortality of monarch butterflies in Mexico during January 2002. In: The Monarch Butterfly: Biology and Conservation, ed. Oberhauser, K. & Solensky, M.J., pp. 151166. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
Chapela, G. & Barkin, D. (1995) Monarcas y campesinos. México City, Mexico: Mexico Centro de Ecología y Desarrollo.
Costanza, R. & Folke, C. (1997) Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness, and sustainability goals. In: Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, ed. Daily, G.C., pp. 4968. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Daily, G.C., ed. (1997) Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Diario Oficial (1980) Decreto que declara zonas de reserva y refugio silvestre, lugares donde la mariposa inverna y se reproduce. Diario Oficial. Mexico City, Mexico: Órgano del Gobierno Constitucional de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
Diario Oficial (1986) Decreto que declara áreas naturales protegidas para fines de migración, invernación, y reproducción de la mariposa monarca. Decreto Vol. 398. Mexico City, Mexico: Órgano del Gobierno Constitucional de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
Engel, S., Pagiola, S. & Wunder, S. (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 64: 663674.
Ferraro, P.J. (2001) Global habitat protection: limitations of development interventions and a role for conservation performance payments. Conservation Biology 15: 9901000.
Ferraro, P.J. & Kiss, A. (2002) Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298: 17181719.
Ferraro, P.J. & Simpson, R.D. (2002) The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Economics 78: 339353.
Furusawa, T.K., Pahari, M., Umezaki, , & Ohtsuka, R. (2004) Impacts of selective logging on New Georgia Island, Solomon Islands evaluated using very high resolution satellite (IKONOS) data. Environmental Conservation 31: 349355.
Hajkowicz, S., Higgins, A., Miller, C. & Marinoni, O. (2008) Targeting conservation payments to achieve multiple outcomes. Biological Conservation 141: 23682375.
Honey-Rosés, J. (2005) The monarch butterfly conservation fund. In: The Green Buck: Using Economic Tools to Deliver Conservation Goals, ed. LeQuesne, T.. & McNally, R., pp. 1618. London, UK: WWF United Kingdom.
Honey-Rosés, J. (2009) Disentangling the proximate factors of deforestation: the case of the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve in Mexico. Land Degradation and Development. 20: 2232.
Hoth, J., Merino, L., Oberhauser, K., Pisanty, I. & Price, S., eds (1999) 1997 North American Conference on the Monarch Butterfly. Montreal, Canada: Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
Kaimowitz, D. (2002) Amazon deforestation revisited. Latin American Research Review 37: 221–35.
Klooster, D. (2003) Campesinos and Mexican forest policy during the twentieth century. Latin American Research Review 38: 94126.
Mas, J.F., Velázquez, A., Díaz-Gallegos, J.R., Mayorga-Saucedo, R., Alcántara, C., Bocco, G., Castro, R., Fernández, T. & Pérez-Vega, A. (2004) Assessing land use/cover changes: a nationwide multidate spatial database for Mexico. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 10: 249261.
Merino-Pérez, L. (1995) La Reserva Especial de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca: Problemática y Perspectivas. Vol. II. Mexico City, Mexico: El Colegio de Mexico.
Missrie, M. (2004) Design and implementation of a new protected area for overwintering monarch butterflies in Mexico. In: The Monarch Butterfly: Biology and Conservation, ed. Oberhauser, K. & Solensky, M.J., pp. 141150. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.
Missrie, M. & Nelson, K. (2007) Direct payments for conservation: lessons from the Monarch Butterfly Conservation Fund. In: Biodiversity and Conservation: International Perspectives, ed. Usha, A., pp. 189212. Hyderabad, India: The Icfai University Press.
Muñoz-Piña, C., Guevara, A., Torres, J.M. & Braña, J. (2008) Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: analysis, negotiations and results. Ecological Economics 65: 725736.
Myers, N. (1997) The world's forests and the ecosystem services. In: Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, ed. Daily, G.C.. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Pagiola, S. (2008) Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 65: 712724.
Pagiola, S., Bishop, J. & Landell-Mills, N., eds (2002) Selling Forest Environmental Services Market-Based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.
Pagiola, S. & Rios, A.R. (2008) The Impact of Payments for Environmental Services: From Theory to Practice. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
Panayotou, T. & Ashton, P.S. (1992) Not by Timber Alone: Economics and Ecology for Sustaining Tropical Forests. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A. & Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A. (2008) Payments for environmental services: empirical analysis for Costa Rica. [www document]. URL http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTCC/Resources/407863–1213125462243/5090543–1213136742584/PSAeffectsSAN0805.pdf
Rendón-Salinas, E., Ibarra-Contreras, A., Pérez, J. & Galindo-Leal, C., eds (2005) Primeras Memorias del Foro Regional Mariposa Monarca. Mexico City, Mexico: Fundación Telmex.
Sánchez-Azofeifa, A.G., Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A. & Boomhower, J.P. (2007) Costa Rica's payment for environmental services program: intention, implementation, and impact. Conservation Biology 21: 11651173.
SARH (1982) Manual de Aplicación del Método de Desarrollo Silvícola. Mexico City, Mexico: Dirección General para el Desarrollo Forestal, Subsecretaria Forestal y de la Fauna, Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hídricos.
SEMARNAT (2001) Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca.Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.
Simpson, R. & Sedjo, R.A. (1996) Paying for the conservation of endangered ecosystems: a comparison of direct and indirect approaches. Environment and Development Economics 1: 241257.
Tattenbach, F., Obando, G. & Rodríguez, J. (2006) Mejora del excedente nacional del pago de Servicios Ambientales. San José, Costa Rica: FONAFIFO.
Urquhart, F.A. (1976) Found at last: the monarch's overwintering home. National Geographic 150: 160173.
Wells, S.M., Pyle, R.M. & Collins, N.M. (1983) The IUCN Invertebrate Red Data Book International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN: pp. xxi and xxxii.
Wunder, S. (2005) Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. Occasional Paper No. 42. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR [www document]. URL http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-42.pdf
Wunder, S. (2006) Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable forest management in the tropics? Ecology and Society 11: 23 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art23/
Wunder, S. (2007) The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 4858.
Wunder, S., Engel, S. & Pagiola, S. (2008) Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65: 834–52.
WWF Mexico (2000) Convenios de concertación WWF-FMCN-SEMARNAP-comunidades 24 de octubre de 2000. Contractual Agreement. WWF Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
WWF Mexico (2002) Contrato de fideicomiso monarca WWF-FMCN-BBVA Bancomer servicios S.A.- comunidades. Trust Contract. WWF Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
WWF Mexico (2004) La tala ilegal y su impacto en la Reserva de la Biosfera Mariposa Monarca. WWF Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico [www document]. URL http://www.wwf.org.mx/wwfmex/descargas/010604_Informe_Tala_Reserva.pdf

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

To pay or not to pay? Monitoring performance and enforcing conditionality when paying for forest conservation in Mexico

  • JORDI HONEY-ROSÉS (a1), JOSÉ LÓPEZ-GARCÍA (a2), EDUARDO RENDÓN-SALINAS (a1), ARMANDO PERALTA-HIGUERA (a2) and CARLOS GALINDO-LEAL (a1) (a3)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.