Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 20
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Jaskolski, Martina 2016. Space, Place, and Environment.


    Jovovic, Zoran and Kratovalieva, Suzana 2015. Plant Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge for Food Security.


    Singh, Ranjay K. Singh, Anshuman Garnett, Stephen T. Zander, Kerstin K. Lobsang, and Tsering, Darge 2015. Paisang (Quercus griffithii): A Keystone Tree Species in Sustainable Agroecosystem Management and Livelihoods in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Environmental Management, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 187.


    Halbrendt, Jacqueline Gray, Steven A. Crow, Susan Radovich, Theodore Kimura, Aya H. and Tamang, Bir Bahadur 2014. Differences in farmer and expert beliefs and the perceived impacts of conservation agriculture. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 28, p. 50.


    Gray, Steven A. Gray, Stefan Cox, Linda J. and Henly-Shepard, Sarah 2013. 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. p. 965.

    Izurieta, A. Petheram, L. Stacey, N. and Garnett, S.T. 2013. Costs of participatory monitoring and evaluation of joint management of protected areas in the Northern Territory, Australia. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 21.


    Badola, Ruchi Barthwal, Shivani and Hussain, Syed Ainul 2012. Attitudes of local communities towards conservation of mangrove forests: A case study from the east coast of India. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 96, p. 188.


    Gray, Steven Chan, Alex Clark, Dan and Jordan, Rebecca 2012. Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social–ecological decision-making: Benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecological Modelling, Vol. 229, p. 88.


    Terer, Taita Muasya, A. Muthama Dahdouh-Guebas, Farid Ndiritu, George G. and Triest, Ludwig 2012. Integrating local ecological knowledge and management practices of an isolated semi-arid papyrus swamp (Loboi, Kenya) into a wider conservation framework. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 93, Issue. 1, p. 71.


    Renn, Ortwin 2010. The contribution of different types of knowledge towards understanding, sharing and communication risk concepts. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 177.


    McLeod, Elizabeth Szuster, Brian and Salm, Rodney 2009. Sasiand Marine Conservation in Raja Ampat, Indonesia. Coastal Management, Vol. 37, Issue. 6, p. 656.


    Armitage, Derek Marschke, Melissa and Plummer, Ryan 2008. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 86.


    Birkenholtz, Trevor 2008. Contesting expertise: The politics of environmental knowledge in northern Indian groundwater practices. Geoforum, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 466.


    Cinner, Joshua E. and Aswani, Shankar 2007. Integrating customary management into marine conservation. Biological Conservation, Vol. 140, Issue. 3-4, p. 201.


    Raquez, P. and Lambin, E. F. 2006. Conditions for a sustainable land use: case study evidence. Journal of Land Use Science, Vol. 1, Issue. 2-4, p. 109.


    Spiteri, Arian and Nepalz, Sanjay K. 2006. Incentive-Based Conservation Programs in Developing Countries: A Review of Some Key Issues and Suggestions for Improvements. Environmental Management, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Armitage, Derek 2005. Adaptive Capacity and Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Environmental Management, Vol. 35, Issue. 6, p. 703.


    Folke, Carl Hahn, Thomas Olsson, Per and Norberg, Jon 2005. ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 441.


    Kuniyal, Chandra P. Rawat, Yashwant S. Oinam, Santaram S. Kuniyal, Jagdish C. and Vishvakarma, Subhash C. R. 2005. Kuth (Saussurea lappa) cultivation in the cold desert environment of the Lahaul valley, northwestern Himalaya, India: arising threats and need to revive socio-economic values. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 14, Issue. 5, p. 1035.


    Armitage, Derek 2004. Nature?Society Dynamics, Policy Narratives, and Ecosystem Management: Integrating Perspectives On Upland Change and Complexity in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Ecosystems, Vol. 7, Issue. 7, p. 717.


    ×

Traditional agroecological knowledge, adaptive management and the socio-politics of conservation in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia

  • Derek R. Armitage (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892903000079
  • Published online: 01 April 2003
Abstract

This paper illustrates the opportunity for conservation offered by linking traditional agroecological knowledge and advances in adaptive management theory and practice. Drawing on examples from the Banawa-Marawola region of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, a suite of traditional resource management practices premised on principles of adaptive management are identified and assessed, including: (1) resource management practices and regulations that are associated with the dynamics of complex systems; (2) procedural, planning and decision-making processes that foster learning; (3) sanctions and taboos that act as social mechanisms for the management and conservation of natural resources; and (4) ceremonies and social interactions that promote cultural internalization of the various practices, procedures and mechanisms. In addition, an emerging socio-political movement in the Banawa-Marawola region is explored. Premised on the strengthening of traditional rights and practices, the nascent Kamalise movement potentially provides the socio-political, institutional and organizational context needed to link traditional agroecological knowledge and adaptive management with broader conservation goals. Based on this analysis, two opportunities to enhance conservation in the region are identified: first, maintaining traditional agroecological systems and the associated adaptive resource management strategies used by local groups, and second, building upon the Kamalise movement to forge conservation alliances among communities, non-government and government organizations in which locally-evolved adaptive resource management strategies can be effectively applied. Both opportunities to combine traditional knowledge, adaptive management and conservation, however, are linked to the development aspirations of traditional groups: self-determination, acquisition of land rights and controlling the impacts of changes in livelihood.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Dr Derek R. Armitage, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3C5 e-mail: darmitag@wlu.ca
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Conservation
  • ISSN: 0376-8929
  • EISSN: 1469-4387
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-conservation
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: