Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:32:21.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States' National Park Management: Values, Policy, and Possible Hints for Others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

John Lemons
John Lemons
Affiliation:
Director, Division of Life Sciences, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine 04005, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

National park managers have to make difficult and often controversial decisions regarding how best to protect parks' resources and provide for their continuing use and enjoyment. Strictly speaking, resolution of parks' problems must be based on whether the NPS is adhering to its legislative mandate to regulate development and use and to protect parks' resources. The most basic fiduciary duties of the NPS are to manage resources in natural conditions, provide for use and enjoyment, and provide benefits for present and future generations. However, neither the legislation, judicial interpretations, nor the NPS, has defined the terms natural, appropriate forms (values) of use and enjoyment, or how to resolve intergenerational conflicts between present and future generations. Because neither scientific standards nor criteria of appropriate use have been defined, the NPS traditionally has fashioned policy by compromise—to reflect different citizen constituencies with preferences for different and often conflicting values.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , Winter 1987 , pp. 329 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbour, I.G. (1980). Technology, Environment, and Human Values. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY, USA: xi + 331 pp.Google Scholar
Bonnicksen, T.M. & Stone, E.C. (1985). Restoring naturalness to national parks. Environmental Management, 9, pp. 479–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, S.P. (1985). National park management and values. Environmental Ethics, 1, pp. 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connally, E.H. (Ed.) (1982). National Parks in Crisis. National Parks and Conservation Association, Washington, DC, USA: 220 pp.Google Scholar
Cullinan, T. & Matthews, B. (1976). The Concession System in United States National Parks: Background, Services Performed, Public Attitude Toward, and Future Considerations. Stanford Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, USA: 6 pp.Google Scholar
Devall, B. & Sessions, G. (1984). The development of natural resources and the integrity of nature. Environmental Ethics, 6, pp. 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubos, R. (1968). So Human an Animal. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY, USA: xiv + 267 pp.Google Scholar
Dustin, D.L. & McAvoy, L.H. (1980). Hardining national parks. Environmental Ethics, 1, pp. 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustin, D.L. & McAvoy, L.H. (1982). The decline and fall of quality recreation opportunities and environments? Environmental Ethics, 4, pp. 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfeld, D.W. (1978). The conservation of non-resources. American Scientist, 64, pp. 648–56.Google Scholar
Everhart, W.C. (1982). The National Park Service. Praeger, New York, NY, USA: 198 pp.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, A.K. (1976). National parks: the dilemma of development. Science, 191, pp. 440–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, G. (1968). Tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, pp. 1243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ise, J. (1979). Our National Park Policy: A Critical History. Arno Press, New York, NY, USA: 701 pp.Google Scholar
Jubenville, A. (1976). Outdoor Recreation Planning. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: xiv + 399 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Knight, R.R. & Eberhardt, L.L. (1985). Population dynamics of Yellowstone (USA) Grizzly Bears Ursus arctos horribilis. Ecology, 66, pp. 323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudson, D.M. (1980). Outdoor Recreation. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA: 608 pp.Google Scholar
Lemons, J. (1986 a). Research in the national parks. The Environmental Professional, 8, pp. 127–37.Google Scholar
Lemons, J. (1986 b). Ecological stress phenomena and holistic environmental ethics—a viewpoint. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 27, pp. 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemons, J. (1987). Title 16 United States Code §55 and its implications for management of concession facilities in Yosemite National Park. Environmental Management, 11, pp. 461–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemons, J. & Stout, D. (1984). A reinterpretation of national park legislation. Environmental Law, 15, pp. 41–65.Google Scholar
Lewis, H.T. (1973). Patterns of Indian Burning in California: Ecology and Ethnohistory. Ballena Press, Ramona, California, USA: 101 pp.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. & Miller, K.R. (Eds) (1984). National Parks, Conservation, and Development. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA: xiii + 825 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Mantell, M. (1979). Preservation and use: Concessions in national parks. Ecology Law Quarterly, 8, pp. 1–54.Google Scholar
National Park Service (1978). Draft Environmental Statement, General Management Plan, Yosemite National Park, California. US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA: 242 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
National Park Service (1980 a). State of the Parks—1980, A Report to Congress. Office of Science and Technology, US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA: x + 57 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
National Park Service (1980 b). Proceedings of the Second Conference on Scientific Research in the National Parks, Human Impact on Natural Resources. US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA: 386 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
National Park Service (1980 c). Yosemite General Management Plan. US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA: 78 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Parks Canada (1982). Parks Canada Policy. Department of the Environment, Ottawa, Canada: 69 pp.Google Scholar
Parsons, D.J., Graber, D.M., Agee, J.K. & Wagtendonk, J.W.V. (1986). Natural fire management in national parks. Environmental Management, 10, pp. 21–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, E. (Ed.) (1981). Responsibilities to Future Generations. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, USA: xiv + 319 pp.Google Scholar
Polunin, N. & Eidsvik, H.K. (1979). Ecological principles for the establishment and management of national parks and equivalent areas. Environmental Conservation, 6(1), pp. 21–6, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, G.C. (1976). Survey of critical marine habitats and requirements for their conservation. Pp. 15–59 in Proceedings, International Conference on Marine Parks and Reserves, IUCN Publication New Series No. 37, Merges, Switzerland: 131 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Regan, T. (Ed.) (1984). Earthbound. Random House, New York, NY, USA:xvi + 371 pp.Google Scholar
Rolston, H. III (1985). Valuing wildlands. Environmental Ethics, 7, pp. 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruckleshaus, W.D. (1983). Science, risk, and public policy. Science, 221, pp. 1026–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sax, J. (1979). Fashioning a recreation policy for our national parks: the philosophy of choice and the choice of philosophy. Creighton Law Review, 11, pp. 973–85.Google Scholar
Sax, J. (1980). Mountains Without Handrails: Reflections on the National Parks. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: 160 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabecoff, M. (1981). Administration seeks greater role for entrepreneurs at federal parks. New York Times, 03 29, §1, at 1, col. 1.Google Scholar
Smith, P.G.R. & Theberge, J.B. (1986). A review of criteria for evaluating natural areas. Environmental Management, 10, pp. 715–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P.B. (1986). Uncertainty arguments in environmental issues. Environmental Ethics, 8, pp. 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives (1974). National Park Service Planning and Concession Operations: Joint Hearing Before Certain Subcommittees of the Committee on Government Operations and the Permanent Select Committee on Small Business. 93rd Congress, 2nd Session, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA: vii + 515 pp.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives (1975). National Park Service Management of Concession Operations: Joint Hearings Before Certain Subcommittees of the Committee on Government Operations and the Committee on Small Business. 94th Congress, 1st Session, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA: vi + 1082 pp.Google Scholar
Wright, R.G. (1985). Principles of new park-area planning as applied to the Wrangell-St. Elias region of Alaska. Environmental Conservation, 12(1), pp. 59–66, 7 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar