Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Marcellus Shale Gas Development and New Boomtown Research: Views of New York and Pennsylvania Residents

  • Richard C. Stedman (a1), Jeffrey B. Jacquet (a2), Matthew R. Filteau (a3), Fern K. Willits (a3), Kathryn J. Brasier (a3) and Diane K. McLaughlin (a3)...

Development of unconventional natural gas resources in the Marcellus Shale region of the northeastern United States has progressed rapidly over the last decade. The discourse surrounding such development recalls quarter-century-old debates about positive and negative implications for the well-being of such energy boomtowns. Potential support or opposition relates to trust in the industry and its regulators, perceived knowledge, and perceived impacts. Our research project takes advantage of the opportunity for a natural experiment in comparing these elements between two spatially adjacent sites with contrasting approaches to gas development: in Pennsylvania, drilling of unconventional natural gas reserves has been proceeding for nearly a decade, whereas, at the time of this writing, drilling has not begun in New York. A mail survey of a random sample of New York and Pennsylvania residents within the Marcellus region revealed important differences between sites. New York residents were more opposed to development, characterized the industry in a more negative light, and were more likely to have engaged in various forms of public participation. In contrast, respondents did not differ by state on their perceived level of knowledge, even though gas development is more advanced in Pennsylvania. Potential explanations for these findings are offered, as are implications for understanding newly emerging energy boomtowns.

Environmental Practice 14:287–298 (2012)

Corresponding author
Richard C. Stedman, 207 Bruckner Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850; (phone) 607-255-9729; (fax) 607 255-0349; (e-mail)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L.M. Bacigalupi , and W.R. Freudenberg . 1983. Increased Mental Health Caseloads in an Energy Boomtown. Administration in Mental Health 10(4):306322.

M.M. Bell 1997. The Ghosts of Place. Theory and Society 26(6):813836.

S.E. Bell , and R. York . 2010. Community Economic Identity: The Coal Industry and Ideology Construction in West Virginia. Rural Sociology 75(1):111143.

R.B. Brown , S.F. Dorius , and R.S. Krannich . 2005. The Boom-Bust-Recovery Cycle: Dynamics of Change in Community Satisfaction and Social Integration in Delta, Utah. Rural Sociology 70(1):2849

T.C. Colborn , C. Kwiatkowski , K. Schultz , and M. Bachran . 2011. Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 17:10391056.

W.R. Freudenburg 1986. The Density of Acquaintanceship: An Overlooked Variable in Community Research? American Journal of Sociology 92(1):2763.

W.R. Freudenburg , and T.R. Jones . 1991. Attitudes and Stress in the Presence of Technological Risk: A Test of the Supreme Court Hypothesis. Social Forces 69(4):11431168.

J.S. Gilmore 1976. Boom Towns May Hinder Energy Resource Development. Science 191(4227):535540.

T.R. Greider , and R.S. Krannich . 1985. Perceptions of Problems in Rapid Growth and Stable Communities: A Comparative Analysis. Community Development Society Journal 16(2):8096.

J.R. Parkins , and A.C. Angell . 2011. Linking Social Structure, Fragmentation, and Substance Abuse in a Resource Based Community. Community, Work, and Family 14(1):3955.

R.C. Stedman , M.N. Patriquin , and J.R. Parkins . 2012. Dependence, Diversity, and the Well-being of Rural Community: Building on the Freudenburg Legacy. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2(1):2838.

K.P. Wilkinson , J.G. Thompson , R.R. Reynolds Jr., and L.M. Ostresh . 1982. Local Social Disruption and Western Energy Development: A Critical Review. Pacific Sociological Review 25(3):275296.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Environmental Practice
  • ISSN: 1466-0466
  • EISSN: 1466-0474
  • URL: /core/journals/environmental-practice
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 44 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 297 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.