Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T00:09:08.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of mixed foot–and–mouth disease virus infections in Saudi Arabia: prolonged circulation of an exotic serotype

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

E. L. Woodbury
Affiliation:
Kings College, University of London, Campden Hill Road, Kensington, London W8, UK
A. R. Samuel
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey GU24 ONF, UK
N. J. Knowles
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey GU24 ONF, UK
S. M. Hafez
Affiliation:
C/O National Agriculture and Water Research Centre, PO Box 17285, Riyadh 11484, Saudi Arabia
R. P. Kitching
Affiliation:
C/O National Agriculture and Water Research Centre, PO Box 17285, Riyadh 11484, Saudi Arabia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Plaque purification of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) type O viruses isolated from cattle in Saudi Arabia showed the presence of mixed serotype infections. Sixteen out of 31 samples collected between 1985 and 1991 also contained Asia 1 virus, a serotype which had previously only been isolated from a single outbreak in that country in 1980. Nucleotide sequences of the Asia 1 component of all these samples revealed little variation and showed that they were closely related to both a Russian lapinized vaccine virus strain (Asia 1/Tadzhikistan/64), and to a field isolate from Turkey (Asia 1/TUR/15/73). Although mixed FMD infections have been observed previously this is a first report of a serotype, considered to be exotic to a country, co-existing undetected for an extended period of time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

References

REFERENCES

Arrowsmith, AEM. Variation among strains of type A foot–and–mouth disease virus in the Eastern Mediterranean region 1964–1972. J Hyg 1975; 75: 387–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedger, RS, Herniman, KA. The Middle East foot-and-mouth disease type A epizootic 1964–65. I. Epizootiology and antigenic studies. Bull Off Int Epiz 1966; 65: 303–12.Google Scholar
Brooksby, JB. Exotic strain of FMD in Turkey. Vet Rec 1973; 93: 320–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous. Greek outbreak in Thrace buffer zone. Bull Off Int Epiz 1984; 96: 20–3.Google Scholar
Samuel, AR, Ouldridge, EJ, Arrowsmith, AEM, Kitching, RP, Knowles, NJ. Antigenic analysis of serotype O foot-and-mouth virus isolates from the Middle East, 1981 to 1988. Vaccine 1990; 8: 390–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuel, AR, Knowles, NJ, Kitching, RP. Preliminary antigenic and molecular analysis of strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype O isolated from Saudi Arabia in 1988 and 1989. Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease. Lindholm, Denmark. Rome: FAO, 1990: 139–45.Google Scholar
Kitson, JDA, McCahon, D, Belsham, GJ. Sequence analysis of monoclonal antibody resistant mutants of type O foot-and-mouth disease virus: evidence for the involvement of the three surface exposed capsid proteins in four antigenic sites. Virology 1990; 179: 2634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brocchi, E, Civardi, A, De Simone, F, Panina, GF. Characterisation of foot-and-mouth disease virus antibodies. 20th Congress of the Italian Society of Microbiology, Gardone, Italy. Atti delle Societa Italiana delle scienze veterinarie, 1983; 36: 576–8.Google Scholar
Cappuchi, L, Brocchi, E, De Simone, F, Panina, GF. Characterisation of monoclonal antibodies produced against foot-and-mouth disease viruses. Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Brescia, Italy. Rome: FAO, 1984: 1719.Google Scholar
Xie, QC, McCahon, D, Crowther, JR, Belsham, GJ, McCullough, KC. Neutralisation of foot-and-mouth disease virus can be mediated through any of at least three separate antigenic sites. J Gen Virol 1987; 68: 1637–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuel, AR, Knowles, NJ, Samuel, GD, Crowther, JR. The evaluation of a trapping ELISA for the differentiation of foot-and-mouth disease virus strains using monoclonal antibodies. Biologicals 1991; 19: 299310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roeder, PL, le Blanc, Smith PM. Detection and typing of foot-and-mouth disease virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: a sensitive, rapid and reliable technique for primary diagnosis. Res Vet Sci 1987; 43: 225–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitching, RP, Rendle, R, Ferris, NP. Rapid correlation between field isolates and vaccine strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Vaccine 1988; 6: 403–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanger, F, Nicklen, S, Coulson, AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74: 5463–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmern, D, Kaesberg, P. 3'-Terminal nucleotide sequence of encephalomyocarditis virus RNA determined by reverse transcriptase and chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978; 75: 4257–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, NJ. A method for direct nucleotide sequencing of foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA for epidemiological studies.Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Lindholm. Denmark. Rome: FAO. 1990: 106–12.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 1989: 5: 164–6.Google Scholar
Sosnovtsev, SV, Onischenko, AM, Petrov, NA et al. , Primary structure of the gene of the VP1 protein of epidemic stomatitis virus of Asia 1 serotype. Molekulyarnaya Genetika. Microbiologiya i Virusologiya 1989; 12: 44–6.Google Scholar
Ansell, DM, Samuel, AR, Carpenter, WC, Knowles, NJ. Genetic relationships between foot-and-mouth disease type Asia 1 viruses. Epidemiol Infect 1994; 112: 213–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedger, RS. Foot-and-mouth disease and the African buffalo (Syncerus caffer). J Comp Path 1972: 82: 1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moosbrugger, GA. 1966. Changes in type of foot-and-mouth disease virus during an outbreak. Bull Off Int Epiz 1966; 65: 2023–34.Google Scholar
Overby, E. An outbreak of FMD of serotype Asian 1 in vaccinated (against virus types O. A and C) cattle in Saudi Arabia (case report). Vet Med Rev 1984; 1: 23–8.Google Scholar
Armstrong, RM, Samuel, AR, Knowles, NJ, Uluturk, S. Genetic studies on foot-and-mouth disease viruses isolated from samples collected in Turkey. Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Berne, Switzerland. Rome: FAO, 1992.Google Scholar
Samuel, AR, Knowles, NJ, Kitching, RP. Serological and biochemical analysis of some recent type A foot-and-mouth disease virus isolates from the Middle East. Epidemiol Infect 1988; 101: 577–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, RM, Samuel, AR, Carpenter, WC, Rama, Kant, Knowles, NJ. A comparative study of serological and biochemical methods for strain differentiation of foot-and-mouth disease type A viruses. Vet Microbiol 1993; in press.Google Scholar
Krebs, O, Marquardt, O. Identification and characterisation of foot-and-mouth disease virus O Burgwedel/1987 as an intertypic recombinant. J Gen Virol 1992; 73: 613–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, O. Methods that identify recombinant FMDV strains. Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Berne, Switzerland. Rome: FAO, 1992.Google Scholar
Amaral-Doel, CMF, Owen, NE, Ferris, NP, Kitching, RP, Doel, TR. Detection of foot-and-mouth disease viral sequences in clinical specimens and ethyleneimine-inactivated preparations by the polymerase chain reaction. Vaccine 1993; 11: 415–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed