Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Contribution of Meat Inspection to the surveillance of poultry health and welfare in the European Union

  • A. HUNEAU-SALAÜN (a1), K. D. C. STÄRK (a2) (a3), A. MATEUS (a2) (a3), C. LUPO (a4), A. LINDBERG (a5) and S. LE BOUQUIN-LENEVEU (a1)...
Summary

In the European Union, Meat Inspection (MI) aims to protect public health by ensuring that minimal hazardous material enters in the food chain. It also contributes to the detection and monitoring of animal diseases and welfare problems but its utility for animal surveillance has been assessed partially for some diseases only. Using the example of poultry production, we propose a complete assessment of MI as a health surveillance system. MI allows a long-term syndromic surveillance of poultry health but its contribution is lowered by a lack of data standardization, analysis and reporting. In addition, the probability of case detection for 20 diseases and welfare conditions was quantified using a scenario tree modelling approach, with input data based on literature and expert opinion. The sensitivity of MI appeared to be very high to detect most of the conditions studied because MI is performed at batch level and applied to a high number of birds per batch.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Contribution of Meat Inspection to the surveillance of poultry health and welfare in the European Union
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Contribution of Meat Inspection to the surveillance of poultry health and welfare in the European Union
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Contribution of Meat Inspection to the surveillance of poultry health and welfare in the European Union
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Author for correspondence: Dr A. Huneau-Salaün, ANSES, BP53, 22440 Ploufragan, France. (Email: adeline.huneau@anses.fr)
References
Hide All
1. FAO/OMS. Assuring Food Safety and Quality: Guidelines for Strengthening National Food Control Systems. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper No. 76, 2002, 84 pp.
2. Dwinger, RH, et al. A brief overview of food hygiene legislation. Deutsche Tieraerztliche Wochenschrift 2007; 114: 294298.
3. FAO. Risk-based food inspection manual. Rome, Italy: Organisation Mondiale des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture; 2008, 85 pp.
4. European Commission. Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the experience gained from the application of the hygiene regulation (EC) No. 852/2004, (EC) No. 853/2004 and (EC) No. 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004, 2009.
5. European Commission, Health and Consumers Directorate - General. Requests for a scientific opinion and technical assistance on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat, 2010.
6. EFSA. Scientific Opinion on the public health hazards to be covered by inspection of meat (poultry). EFSA Journal 2012; 10: 2471.
7.Anon. Regulation (EC) No. 854/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific rules for the organisation of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption. Official Journal of the European Union 2004; L 139: 206320.
8. Lupo, C. Appreciation of the risk of sanitary condemnation in poultry carcasses ar slaughterhouse based on food chain information: University of Rennes 1, 2009, 323 pp.
9. Lupo, C, et al. Bayesian network as an aid for food chain information use for meat inspection. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2013; 109: 2536.
10. Allain, V, et al. Health inspection at poultry slaughterhouses: indicators of tasks achievement for veterinary inspection missions. In: World Veterinary Poultry Association Congress. Nantes, France: ISPAIA, 2013, pp. 112.
11. Löhren, U. Overview on current practices of poultry slaughtering and poultry meat inspection: supporting publications EN-298, 2012, 58 pp.
12. OIE. OIE-listed diseases, infections and infestations in force in 2014 (http://www.oie.int/en/animal-health-in-the-world/oie-listed-diseases-2014/). Paris, France: OIE. Accessed 12 May 2014.
13. Lupo, C, et al. Postmortem condemnations of processed broiler chickens in western France. Veterinary Record 2008; 162: 709713.
14. Lupo, C, et al. Risk and indicators of condemnation of male turkey broilers in western France, February-July 2006. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2010; 94: 240250.
15. Grist, A. Poultry Inspection, 2nd edn. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press, 2006, pp. 276.
16. Jordan, FTW. Avian tuberculosis. In: Jordan, FTW, ed. Poultry Diseases, 3rd edn. London: Baillère Tindall, 1990, pp. 6873.
17. Fallavena, LCB, et al. Diagnosis of skin lesions in condemned or downgraded carcasses – a microscopic and macroscopic study. Avian Pathology 2000; 29: 557562.
18. Ansong-Danquah, J. A survey of carcass condemnation at a poultry abattoir and its application to disease management. Canadian Veterinary Journal 1987; 28: 5356.
19. EFSA. Scientific opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare of broilers. EFSA Journal 2012; 10: 2774.
20. Welfare Quality. Welfare quality assessment protocol for poultry (broilers, laying hens). Lelystad, The Netherlands, 2009, 114 pp.
21. Gouveia, KG, Vaz-Pires, P, Martins da Costa, P. Welfare assment of broilers through examination of haematomas, foot-pad dermatitis, scratches and breast blisters at processing. Animal Welfare 2009; 18: 4348.
22. Allain, V, et al. Relations between different skin lesions measured at slaughterhouse in broiler chickens and between prevalence of these lesions and different rearing factors. British Poultry Science 2009; 50: 407417.
23. Ekstrand, C, et al. Prevalence and control of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers in Sweden. British Poultry Science 1998; 39: 318324.
24. Berg, C. Pododermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens. In: Weeks, CA, Butterworth, A, eds. Measuring and Auditing Broiler Welfare. Wallingford: CABI, 2004, pp. 3750.
25. Kumor, LW, et al. Cellulitis in broiler chickens: epidemiological trends, meat hygiene, and possible human health implications. Avian Diseases 1998; 42: 285291.
26. Olkowski, AA, et al. Cellulitis lesions in commercial turkeys identified during processing. Veterinary Record 1999; 145: 228229.
27. Saint-Hilaire, S, Sears, W. Trends in cellulitis condemnations in the Ontario chicken industry between April 1998 and April 2001. Avian Diseases 2003; 47: 537548.
28. Elfadil, AA, Vaillancourt, JP, Meek, AH. Farm management risk factors associated with cellulitis in broiler chickens in southern Ontario. Avian Diseases 1996; 40: 699706.
29. Hoinville, LJ, et al. Proposed terms and concepts for describing and evaluating animal-health surveillance systems. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2013; 112: 112.
30. Salman, MD, Stärk, KDC, Zepeda, C. Quality assurance applied to animal disease surveillance systems. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 2003; 22: 689.
31. Fisher, ME, Trampel, DW, Griffith, RW. Post mortem detection of acute septicemia in broilers. Avian Diseases 1998; 42: 452461.
32. Enoe, C, et al. The need for built-in validation of surveillance data so that changes in diagnostic performance of post-mortem meat inspection can be detected. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2003; 57: 117125.
33. Bonde, M, et al. Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of routine meat inspection of Danish slaughter pigs using latent class analysis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2010; 94: 163169.
34. Stärk, KDC, Nevel, A. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the pig health monitoring systems used in England. Veterinary Record 2009; 165: 461465.
35. Hathaway, SC, Richards, MS. Determination of the performance attributes of post-mortem meat inspection procedures. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1993; 16: 119131.
36. Stärk, KDC, et al. Strengths and weaknesses of meat inspection as a contribution to animal health and welfare surveillance. Food Control 2014; 39: 154162.
37. COMISURV. External scientific report submitted to EFSA on the contribution of meat inspection to animal health surveillance in poultry, 2012, 131 pp.
38. Martin, PAJ, Cameron, AR, Greiner, M. Demonstrating freedom from disease using a complex data sources 1: a new methodology based on scenario trees. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2007; 79: 7197.
39.Anon. Commission Decision of 19 October 2005 laying down biosecurity measures to reduce the risk of transmission of highly pathogenic avian influenza caused by Influenza virus A subtype H5N1 from birds living in the wild to poultry and other captive birds and providing for an early detection system in areas at particular risk. Official Journal of the European Union 2005; L 274: 105.
40.Anon. Commission Decision of 25 June 2010 on the implementation by Member States of surveillance programmes for avian inf luenza in poultry and wild birds (notified under document C(2010) 4190). Official Journal of the European Union 2010; L 166: 22.
41. Christensen, J, et al. A scenario tree model for the Canadian Notifiable Avian Influenza Surveillance System and its application to estimation of probability of freedom and sample size determination. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2011; 99: 161175.
42. Alba, A, et al. Assessment of different surveillance systems for avian influenza in commercial poultry in Catalonia (North-Eastern Spain). Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2010; 97: 107118.
43. Bremner, AS. Post mortem condemnation returns from poultry slaughterhouses in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 1994; 135: 622623.
44. Haslam, SM, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with it, of birds dead on arrival at the slaughterhouse and other rejection conditions in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 2008; 49: 685696.
45. Lupo, C, et al. Risk factors for sanitary condemnation in broiler chickens and their relative impact: application of an original multiblock approach. Epidemiology and Infection 2010; 138: 364375.
46. Lovland, A, Kaldhusdal, M. Liver lesions seen at slaughter as an indicator of necrotic enteritis in broiler flocks. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 1999; 24: 345351.
47. Mayes, FJ. The incidence of bruising in broiler flocks. British Poultry Science 1980; 21: 505–9.
48. Kyvsgaard, NC, et al. Temporal changes and risk factors for foo-pad dermatitis in Danish broilers. Poultry Science 2013; 92: 2632.
49. Lund, VP, et al. Pathological manifestations observed in dead-on-arrival broilers at a Danish abattoir. British Poultry Science 2013; 54: 430440.
50. van Veen, L, et al. Increased condemnation of broilers associated with Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale . Veterinary Record 2000; 147: 422423.
51. van Veen, L, et al. Diagnosis and incidence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in commercial broiler chickens at slaughter. Veterinary Record 2005; 156: 315.
52. Januskeviciene, G, et al. Analysis of pathologic lesions in the livestock and poultry slaughtered in the meat establishments of Lithuania. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika 2010; 52: 3342.
53. Stoev, SD, et al. Mycotoxic nephropathy in Bulgarian pigs and chickens: complex etiology and similarity to Balkan Endemic Nephropathy. Food Additives and Contaminants 2009; 27: 7288.
54. Radkowski, M, Uradzinski, J, Szteyn, J. The occurrence of infectious and parasitic diseases in poultry slaughtered in the district of Olsztyn, Poland, 1986–91. Avian Diseases 1996; 40: 285289.
55. Olkowski, AA, Kumor, LW, Classen, HL. Changing epidemiology of ascites in broiler chickens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 1996; 76: 135140.
56. Tessier, M, et al. Cellulitis in broiler chickens: a one-year retrospective study in four Québec abattoirs. Avian Diseases 2001; 45: 191194.
57. Bielby, M. A review of broiler chicken condemnations in Western Canada in 1998. In: Proceedings of the Forty-eighth Western Poultry Disease Conference. Vancouver, Canada, 1999, pp. 78.
58. Herenda, D, Jakel, O. Poultry abattoir survey of carcass condemnation for standard, vegetarian, and free range chickens. Canadian Veterinary Journal 1994; 35: 293296.
59. Hutchison, TWS, Riddel, C. A study of hepatic lesions in broiler chickens at processing plants in Saskatchewan. Canadian Veterinary Journal 1990; 31: 2025.
60. Mallia, JG, et al. Risk factors for abattoir condemnation of turkey carcasses due to cyanosis in Southern Ontario. Poultry Science 2000; 79: 831837.
61. Weinstock, D, et al. Histopathology and epidemiology of condemnations due to squamous cell carcinoma in broiler chickens in North Carolina. Avian Diseases 1995; 39: 676686.
62. Zimmerman, FC, et al. Downgrading of heavy broiler chicken carcasses due to myodegenration of the anterior latissimus dorsi: pathologic and epidemiologic studies. Avian Diseases 2012; 56: 418421.
63. Jacobsen, G, Flôres, ML. Ascitic condemnations in broilers slaughtered under federal inspection between 2002 and 2006 in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Cienca Rural 2008; 38: 19661971.
64. d'Arc, Moretti L, et al. Time series evaluation of traumatic lesions and airsacculitis at one poultry abattoir in the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil (1996–2005). Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2010; 94: 23123–9.
65. Santana, AP, et al. Causes of condemnation of carcasses from poultry in slaughterhouses located in state of Goias, Brazil. Cienca Rural 2008; 38: 25872592.
66. Paschoal, EC, Otutumi, LK, Silveira, AP. Major reasons for condemnation in broiler slaughter in a slaughter house located in the northwest of Parana, Brazil. Arquivos de Ciencas Veterinarias e Zoologia 2013; 15: 9397.
67. Spanamberg, A, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus from normal and condemned carcasses with airsacculitis in commercial poultry. Pesquisa Veterinaria Brasileira 2013; 33: 10711075.
68. Aboulela, MA. CAV and broiler downgrading. Poultry International 1998, pp. 3031.
69. Ansari-Lari, M, Rezagholi, M. Poultry abattoir survey of carcass condemnations in Fars province, southern Iran. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2007; 79: 287293.
70. Sekizaki, T, et al. Endocarditis in chickens caused by subclinical infection of Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus. Avian Diseases 2008; 52: 183186.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed