Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Effective case/infection ratio of poliomyelitis in vaccinated populations

  • G. BENCSKÓ (a1) (a2) and T. FERENCI (a3)

Recent polio outbreaks in Syria and Ukraine, and isolation of poliovirus from asymptomatic carriers in Israel have raised concerns that polio might endanger Europe. We devised a model to calculate the time needed to detect the first case should the disease be imported into Europe, taking the effect of vaccine coverage – both from inactivated and oral polio vaccines, also considering their differences – on the length of silent transmission into account by deriving an ‘effective’ case/infection ratio that is applicable for vaccinated populations. Using vaccine coverage data and the newly developed model, the relationship between this ratio and vaccine coverage is derived theoretically and is also numerically determined for European countries. This shows that unnoticed transmission is longer for countries with higher vaccine coverage and a higher proportion of IPV-vaccinated individuals among those vaccinated. Assuming borderline transmission (R = 1·1), the expected time to detect the first case is between 326 days and 512 days in different countries, with the number of infected individuals between 235 and 1439. Imperfect surveillance further increases these numbers, especially the number of infected until detection. While longer silent transmission does not increase the number of clinical diseases, it can make the application of traditional outbreak response methods more complicated, among others.

Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence: Dr T. Ferenci, John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics, Physiological Controls Group, Óbuda University, H-1034, Bécsi út 96/b, Budapest, Hungary. (Email:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

4. RJD Tebbens , Expert review on poliovirus immunity and transmission. Risk Analysis 2013; 33: 544605.

11. M Eichner , SO Brockmann . Polio emergence in Syria and Israel endangers Europe. Lancet 2013; 382: 1777.

12. M Eichner , K Dietz . Eradication of poliomyelitis: when can one be sure that polio virus transmission has been terminated? American Journal of Epidemiology 1996; 143: 816822.

14. N Nathanson , OM Kew . From emergence to eradication: the epidemiology of poliomyelitis deconstructed. American Journal of Epidemiology 2010; 172: 12131229.

17. A Burton , WHO and UNICEF estimates of national infant immunization coverage: methods and processes. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009; 87: 535541.

20. H Okayasu , Mucosal immunity and poliovirus vaccines: impact on wild poliovirus infection and transmission. Vaccine 2011; 29: 82058214.

24. HE Gary , R Sanders , MA Pallansch . A theoretical framework for evaluating the sensitivity of surveillance for detecting wild poliovirus: II. Factors affecting detection sensitivity in a population with circulating wild poliovirus. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1997; 175: S141145.

25. RE Watkins , An evaluation of the sensitivity of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance for poliovirus infection in Australia. BMC Infectious Diseases 2009; 9: 162.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Bencskó and Ferenci supplementary material
Table S1

 Unknown (80 KB)
80 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 133 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.