Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Maple, Peter 2015. Application of Oral Fluid Assays in Support of Mumps, Rubella and Varicella Control Programs. Vaccines, Vol. 3, Issue. 4, p. 988.


    Ramirez, Alejandro Wang, Chong Prickett, John R. Pogranichniy, Roman Yoon, Kyoung-Jin Main, Rodger Johnson, John K. Rademacher, Chris Hoogland, Marlin Hoffmann, Patrick Kurtz, Anne Kurtz, Ernest and Zimmerman, Jeffrey 2012. Efficient surveillance of pig populations using oral fluids. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 104, Issue. 3-4, p. 292.


    Ster, Irina Chis 2012. Inference for serological surveys investigating past exposures to infections resulting in long-lasting immunity – an approach using finite mixture models with concomitant information. Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 39, Issue. 11, p. 2523.


    Hens, Kristien Nys, Herman Cassiman, Jean-Jacques and Dierickx, Kris 2011. Risks, Benefits, Solidarity: A Framework for the Participation of Children in Genetic Biobank Research. The Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 158, Issue. 5, p. 842.


    Hens, K. Nys, H. Cassiman, J.-J. and Dierickx, K. 2011. The Storage and Use of Biological Tissue Samples from Minors for Research: A Focus Group Study. Public Health Genomics, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 68.


    ×

Feasibility of collecting oral fluid samples in the home setting to determine seroprevalence of infections in a large-scale cohort of preschool-aged children

  • S. E. BARTINGTON (a1), C. PECKHAM (a1), D. BROWN (a2), H. JOSHI (a3) and C. DEZATEUX (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268808000927
  • Published online: 01 June 2008
Abstract
SUMMARY

Oral fluid is a non-invasive biological sample, which can be returned by post, making it suitable for large-scale epidemiological studies in children. We report our experience of oral fluid collection from 14 373 preschool-aged children in the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Samples were collected by mothers in the home setting following the guidance of trained interviewers, and posted to the laboratory. Samples were received from 11 698 children (81·4%). Children whose mothers were of Black Caribbean ethnicity and who lived in non-English-speaking households were less likely to provide a sample, and those with a maternal history of asthma more likely to provide a sample [adjusted risk ratio (95% CI) 0·85 (0·73–0·98), 0·87 (0·77–0·98) and 1·03 (1·00–1·05) respectively]. Collection of oral fluid samples is feasible and acceptable in large-scale child cohort studies. Formal interpreter support may be required to increase participation rates in surveys that collect biological samples from ethnic minorities.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence: Miss S. E. Bartington, MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK. (Email: s.bartington@ich.ucl.ac.uk)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.JR George , JH Fitchen . Future applications of oral fluid specimen technology. American Journal of Medicine 1997; 102: 2125.

3.A McKie , A Vyse , C Maple . Novel methods for the detection of microbial antibodies in oral fluid. Lancet Infectious Diseases 2002; 2: 1824.

4.MC Morris , Oral fluid collection by post – a pilot study of two approaches. Public Health 2002; 116: 113119.

5.MC Morris , Stability of total and rubella-specific IgG in oral fluid samples: the effect of time and temperature. Journal of Immunological Methods 2002; 266: 111116.

6.E von Mutius . Allergies, infections and the hygiene hypothesis – the epidemiological evidence. Immunobiology 2007; 212: 433439.

14.AJ Vyse , BJ Cohen , ME Ramsay . A comparison of oral fluid collection devices for use in the surveillance of virus diseases in children. Public Health 2001; 115: 201207.

15.DJ Nokes , An evaluation of oral-fluid collection devices for the determination of rubella antibody status in a rural Ethiopian community. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1998; 92: 679685.

16.D Rose , DA Pevalin . A Researchers Guide to the National Statistics Socioeconomic Classification. London: Sage Publications, 2003.

18.G Zou . A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. American Journal of Epidemiology 2004; 159: 702706.

19.MR Petersen , JA Deddens . A comparison of two methods for estimating prevalence ratios. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008; 8: 9.

22.MC Morris-Cunnington , A population-based seroprevalence study of Hepatitis A virus using oral fluid in England and Wales. American Journal of Epidemiology 2004; 159: 786794.

23.T O'Connell , Oral fluid collection by post for viral antibody testing. International Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 30: 298301.

24.P Chatzipantazi , The feasibility and acceptability of collecting oral fluid from healthy children for anti-HCV testing. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2004; 89: 185187.

25.NS Crowcroft , Epidemiology of Epstein-Barr virus infection in pre-adolescent children: application of a new salivary method in Edinburgh, Scotland. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1998; 52: 101104.

26.S Gibbs , Atopic dermatitis and the hygiene hypothesis. International Journal of Epidemiology 2004; 33: 199207.

27.JD Rothmier , MV Lasley , G Shapiro . Factors influencing parental consent in pediatric clinical research. Pediatrics 2003; 111; 10371041.

28.A Tait , T Voepel-Lewis , S Malviya . Participation of children in clinical research: factors that influence a parent's decision to consent. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 819825.

29.AA Sabri , MA Qayyum . Increasing the participation: another factor. PLoS Med 2005; 3: e250.

30.SM Hunt , R Bhopal . Self report in clinical and epidemiological studies with non-English speakers, the challenge of language and culture. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004; 58: 618622.

31.S Hunt , R Bhopal . Self reports in research with non-English speakers. British Medical Journal 2003; 327: 352353.

32.C Bartlett , The causes and effects of socio-demographic exclusions from clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment 2005; 9: 1152.

33.M Hussain-Gambles , K Atkin , B Leese . Why ethnic minority groups are under-represented in clinical trials: a review of the literature. Health and Social Care in the Community 2004; 12: 382388.

35.S Mason , Representation of South Asian people in randomised clinical trials: analysis of trials' data. British Medical Journal 2003; 326: 12441245.

37.G Lamvu , Racial differences among reasons for participating in research of pregnancy outcomes: The right from the start experience Gender Medicine 2005; 2: 166173.

38.KS Crider , Racial and ethnic disparity in participation in DNA collection at the Atlanta Site of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. American Journal of Epidemiology 2006; 164: 805812.

39.VL Shavers , Racial differences in factors that influence the willingness to participate in medical research studies. Annals of Epidemiology 2002; 12: 248256.

40.A Sheikh . Why are ethnic minorities under-represented in US research studies? PLoS Med 2005; 3: e49.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: