Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T02:27:40.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in pregnant Latin American women and congenital transmission rate in a non-endemic area: the experience of the Valencian Health Programme (Spain)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2011

C. BARONA-VILAR*
Affiliation:
Department of Health, General Directorate of Public Health, Generalitat Valenciana, Spain Centre for Public Health Research (CSISP), Valencia, Spain Spanish Consortium for Research on Epidemiology and Public Health, CIBERESP, Spain
M. J. GIMÉNEZ-MARTÍ
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
T. FRAILE
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Consorcio Hospital General, Valencia, Spain
C. GONZÁLEZ-STEINBAUER
Affiliation:
Department of Health, General Directorate of Public Health, Generalitat Valenciana, Spain
C. PARADA
Affiliation:
Centre for Blood Transfusions, Valencia, Spain
A. GIL-BRUSOLA
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
D. BRAVO
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
M. D. GÓMEZ
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
D. NAVARRO
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
A. PEREZ-TAMARIT
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
L. FERNANDEZ-SILVEIRA
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
A. FULLANA-MONTORO
Affiliation:
Department of Health, General Directorate of Public Health, Generalitat Valenciana, Spain Centre for Public Health Research (CSISP), Valencia, Spain
R. BORRÁS
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr C. Barona-Vilar, Perinatal Health Unit, General Directorate of Public Health, Conselleria de Sanitat, Avda Cataluña, 21, 46020 València (Spain), Fn. 34-96-192 57 39. (Email: barona_car@gva.es)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study describes the results of the health programme implemented in the Valencian Community (Spain) to achieve an early diagnosis of Chagas disease in pregnant Latin American women and their newborns. During 2009 and 2010, 1975 women living in the health districts of three university hospitals were enrolled via midwives or at the time of delivery. Diagnosis of disease was performed using two serological tests with different antigens. Congenital infection was diagnosed by parasitological, molecular or serological methods from blood samples obtained at birth or in subsequent controls. The overall seroprevalence of Chagas infection in pregnant women from 16 different endemic countries was 11·4%. Infection was higher in those from countries in the Gran Chaco Region (Bolivia, 34·1%; Paraguay, 7·4%; Argentina, 5·3%). Eight newborn infants from Bolivian mothers had congenital Chagas which represents a vertical transmission rate of 3·7%. In conclusion, this work supports the benefits of offering an early diagnosis to pregnant women and newborns during routine prenatal healthcare.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

INTRODUCTION

During the last decade, Chagas disease has become an emergent public health problem in Spain [Reference Schmunis1] due to the high number of immigrants from endemic countries. Spain is the European country with the greatest number of people arriving from Latin America, with more than one million immigrants in 2008. It has been estimated that 25/1000 of these people could be infected by Trypanosoma cruzi [Reference Schmunis1] and that, since the disease has a slow evolution, most would be in the chronic asymptomatic stage [2].

In 2005 Spanish legislation stipulated the need to perform universal screening of blood and organ donors from endemic countries [Act 1088/2005 published in the Official Bulletin of the State, BOE number 225]. Another possible mode of transmission in Spain is from mother to child during pregnancy or at delivery. In this sense, the potentially exposed population is high, since there were 31 522 births in women from endemic countries during 2009 in Spain, representing 31% of newborns from foreign mothers [3].

Epidemiological studies conducted in Spain to evaluate the prevalence of the infection in pregnant women from endemic countries have been confined to specific areas. The estimated prevalence in Catalonia and the Valencian Community ranges from 1·75% to 9·7% [Reference Ramos4Reference Orti-Lucas and Parada-Barba9] and this variability has been related to the origin of the women included in each study. Nevertheless, all the studies agree in highlighting that women from Bolivia have the highest risk of infection. With respect to mother-to-child transmission, epidemiological studies have not been performed extensively on the susceptible population in Spain, even though some cases of congenital infection have been reported [Reference Riera10Reference Flores-Chavez12].

As mother-to-child transmission cannot be prevented, an early diagnosis of the infection in newborns is essential. Successful aetiological treatment has been reported in children, with a lower incidence of side-effects than in adults [Reference Azogue13Reference Rodrigues Coura and de Castro15]. Therefore, it is especially recommended that health programmes be implemented for early diagnosis in pregnant women, together with protocols aimed at following up their newborns [Reference Riera10]. In 2009 the Public Health Authorities in the Valencian Community decided to design and perform a strategy for dealing with the early diagnosis of Chagas disease in pregnant women from endemic countries [16]. The aims of this study were to evaluate the level of implementation of the protocol for early diagnosis of Chagas disease in pregnant women in the city of Valencia, to determine the prevalence of infection depending on the geographical origin of the women and to discover the status of the congenital disease.

METHODS

Design and setting

A cross-sectional study was performed during 2009 and 2010 in the city of Valencia (Spain). The sources used were the records obtained from the microbiology laboratories' information systems of the university hospitals with the largest number of births in the city of Valencia: Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Hospital Clínico Universitario and Consorcio Hospital General Universitario. Additional information on births was obtained from the regional Neonatal Metabolic Screening Registry, with thorough coverage and high quality on the main perinatal variables, including the mother's country of origin. This source allowed us to calculate the percentages of mothers from the 16 endemic countries who gave birth in the period who had been screened (targeted women).

Participants and laboratory techniques

The populations studied were pregnant women from endemic countries and their newborns, recruited mainly via midwives from primary health centres. In the Valencian Community, midwives are the primary caregivers of uncomplicated pregnancies and deliveries, providing continuous care with the support of obstetricians when necessary. Free healthcare is offered during pregnancy and up to 40 days after delivery to every woman resident in our region. Women are encouraged to arrange an appointment with the midwife early in the first trimester of pregnancy in order to initiate routine care [17], which includes, among other studies, a blood test in order to determine their immunological status to some infectious diseases (rubella, toxoplasmosis, syphilis, hepatitis B, HIV). In the case of non-serologically controlled women, these analyses are performed at the time of delivery in the hospital. The detection of antibodies to T. cruzi in pregnant women from countries with endemic Chagas disease was reported in 2007 and formalized in 2009 by the Public Health Authorities [16, 18]. The protocol for serological studies that the midwife should offer pregnant women and the algorithm to be followed up is shown in Figure 1. The women were required to give oral consent to screening after being informed by midwives.

Fig. 1. Diagnostic algorithm of Chagas disease in pregnant Latin American women.

The detection of antibodies against T. cruzi, following the WHO recommendations [19], was performed using different antigenic substrates that, depending on the policy of the laboratories, were used either as a combination of two ELISA tests, one whole cell lysate antigen test (Ortho® T. cruzi ELISA Test System, Johnson & Johnson, USA, or Chagatek ELISA, bioMérieux, France) and the other with recombinant antigens (T. Cruzi Ab, DIAPRO, Diagnostic BioProbes, Italy), or by the combination of an ELISA test (Chagatek ELISA) with a rapid test of recombinant antigens (agglutination assay, ID-PaGIA Chagas, DiaMed AG, Switzerland, or immunochromatographic assay; Stick Chagas, Operon SA, Spain). The reactive sera were titrated by indirect immunofluorescence (IFA Kit Trypanosomiasis, MarDx Diagnostics, USA, Innogenetics Ibérica, Spain, or Immunofluor Chagas, Biocientífica, Inverness Medical Ibérica, Spain). Agreement between the results of both tests was considered to be evidence of Chagas disease. Any discrepancies in the results obtained by each laboratory, following the established protocol, were analysed by the other two laboratories participating in the study.

In newborns from mothers with serological evidence of T. cruzi infection, a blood sample from the umbilical cord or peripheral blood was collected and tested immediately after birth for the: (i) microscopic observation of parasites (microhaematocrit); (ii) detection of IgM anti-T. cruzi by IFA, in serum samples previously treated with an anti-rheumatoid factor, and when negative for the detection and titration of IgG antibodies, with the above procedures; (iii) detection of DNA by a home-made nested PCR (target: minicircle kDNA, primer 121/122) performed at the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Majadahonda, Spain) or real time-PCR (RealCycler® CHAG, Progenie Molecular, Spain; Ingenie Molecular®, Progenie Molecular, Spain). Vertical transmission was considered positive when at least one test was positive: (i) the microscopic visualization of the parasite; (ii) the presence of IgM; (iii) the persistence or increase of IgG antibody titres to time; (iv) PCR positive on two separate blood samples for at least one month. Serological controls were performed from 1 to 12 months of age, as shown in Figure 2.

Fig. 2. Diagnostic algorithm of Chagas disease in newborns.

Statistical analysis

The outcome variable of study was the mother's antibodies against T. cruzi. Demographic and obstetric variables were considered as covariables. A descriptive analysis was used to calculate absolute and relative frequencies of the main demographical and epidemiological variables. Seroprevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by country of origin were calculated to obtain the epidemiological profile of the women at higher risk of disease. We compared the screening coverage and prevalence between countries of origin using χ2 and Fisher's tests. A statistically significant level of P<0·05 was assumed. The statistical analysis was performed with Epi Info version 3 (CDC, USA) and SPSS version 14 (SPSS Inc., USA) statistical packages.

RESULTS

In absolute figures, 7346 births from Latin American women occurred between 2009 and 2010 in the Valencian Community, representing about 30% of births from all immigrant mothers. This population was mostly settled in the urban area of the city of Valencia, where 2147 Latin American women gave birth at the three university hospitals included in the study. Of those women, 2070 came from endemic regions: 1132 (54·7%) from the Andean Region, 854 (41·3%) from the South Cone and 84 (4%) from Mexico and Central America. Ecuador with 30% of the mothers, Bolivia with 21·7%, Colombia with 17·8% and Argentina with 6·4% were the most representative countries, as shown in Figure 3.

Fig. 3. Geographical origin of immigrant mothers in the city of Valencia, Spain (2009–2010).

The mean age of the mothers studied was 29 years (s.d.=6, range 14–48 years). Vaginal delivery was predominant (75%). Male newborns represented 53·5% and females 46·5%; they reached 3335 g (s.d.=583) of mean birth weight and a preterm rate (<37 weeks gestation) of 8·3%.

A total of 1975 pregnant women were recruited for screening, all being asymptomatic. This total represents coverage of 95·4% of the target population and there was no significant difference between regions of origin. The prevalence of Chagas disease in pregnant women from endemic countries as a whole was 11·4%. There were no discrepancies between the different serological tests, being in all cases the antibody titres against T. cruzi⩾128. Nevertheless, there were many differences depending on the region of origin. Women from South American countries had significantly higher rates than those from Central American countries (11·8% vs. 2·5%, P<0·01). Of the first group, the prevalence of the disease was higher in women born in countries from the Southern Cone than from the Andean Region (24·8% vs. 0·1%, P<0·0001). Mothers from the Gran Chaco Region, especially those from Bolivia, obtained the highest prevalence (34·1%) in Southern Cone countries and there were statistical differences (P<0·0001) with the other countries in that region: Paraguay (7·4%) and Argentina (5·3%). It should be highlighted that 94·7% (214/226) of the detected cases in this study corresponded to Bolivian mothers (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of T. cruzi infection in pregnant Latin American women resident in the city of Valencia by geographical area and country of origin (2009–2010)

CI, Confidence interval.

Values in parentheses are percentage of target mothers.

* Countries with territories included in the Gran Chaco Region.

Eight newborn infants from Bolivian mothers were diagnosed with congenital Chagas disease, which represents a vertical transmission rate of 3·7%. Only one of the newborns showed hepatosplenomegaly at birth, a sign associated with congenital Chagas disease. The PCR test was the most efficient diagnostic procedure for this cohort since it was positive in 7/8 cases, four of which were exclusively diagnosed by it (Table 2). All cases were followed up and successfully treated with benznidazole (7 mg/kg per day for 60 days) without adverse pharmacological effects.

Table 2. Diagnostic methods of congenital Chagas cases

PCR, Polymerase chain reaction.

DISCUSSION

Our findings reveal that the incorporation of serological screening for Chagas disease into the prenatal care programme conducted by midwives is a good strategy for dealing with mother-to-child transmission in our setting. This was reflected by the fact that 95·4% of pregnant women from 16 different countries where the disease is endemic were screened during the study period. The need to implement public health policies in the host country where immigrant women from these different countries have settled has been highlighted, ensuring detection and treatment of acute and chronic cases, including Chagas congenital infection [Reference Yadon and Schmunis20, Reference Schmunis and Yadon21]. This has become a priority in the Valencian Community, taking into account that it has the third largest concentration of immigrant women from developing countries in Spain and that Latin American mothers contribute the highest proportion of births [3].

The overall seroprevalence of T. cruzi infection in pregnant women from 16 endemic countries in this study was 11·4%. This rate is similar to that described by Jackson et al. [Reference Jackson, Holst and Mauris22] in Latin American women living in Geneva (12·8%) and higher than those previously described in the Valencian Community, with rates between 1·75% and 10% in pregnant women [Reference Ramos4, Reference Gil-Brusola6, Reference Orti-Lucas and Parada-Barba9, Reference Parada23], and in Catalonia with rates from 3·4% to 4·3% in pregnant women and women of child-bearing age, respectively [Reference Muñoz8, Reference Soriano Arandes24]. These differences may be related to sample size, indicating that particular countries of origin of the population under study play an important role in prevalence studies [Reference Schmunis and Yadon21]. This fact has been demonstrated in our study, where the prevalence of Chagas disease was lower in pregnant women born in Mexico or Central America than in those from South America (2·5% vs. 11·8%). In our cohort, infection is more prevalent in women coming from Southern Cone countries in the Gran Chaco Region, than in those born in countries from the Andean Region (24·7% vs. 0·1%).

In Latin America, infection rates in mothers range from 2% to 51% [Reference Azogue, La Fuente and Darras25], being higher in rural areas of Bolivia [Reference Torrico26], where the proportion of infected women of childbearing age varies between 20% and 60%, depending on area of residence [Reference Torrico27]. The infection rate in pregnant Bolivian women (34·1%) found in this study is higher than that reported in Madrid (18%) in pregnant women [Reference González-Granado, Rojo Cornejo and González-Tomé28] and our data suggests that these women could have migrated from rural areas.

In our study there have been eight diagnosed cases of congenital Chagas disease in the newborns from Bolivian mothers, which represents a vertical transmission rate of 3·7% for this cohort. Other researchers have reported variable rates of mother-to-child transmission (1–10%) [Reference Muñoz8, Reference Azogue, La Fuente and Darras25, Reference Torrico27]. In our setting, the number of cases detected is within the range expected according to transmission rates of between 1·3% and 5% estimated by Schmunis & Yadon [Reference Schmunis and Yadon21] for the Bolivian cohorts, which would indicate between three and 11 cases, respectively. In newborns, the most effective diagnostic tool was the PCR, since it allowed diagnosis of seven cases, four of them in isolation, compared to the four diagnoses that could have been made with other tests if PCR had not been performed. These findings support the recent data that PCR is more sensitive and allows an earlier diagnosis of congenital infection than conventional techniques [Reference Bern, Martin and Gilman29].

This study identified that women from the Southern Cone and especially those from Bolivia are the most vulnerable to Chagas disease in immigrant mothers in the Valencian Community. We have demonstrated the benefits of offering early diagnosis to pregnant women and newborns as part of routine primary healthcare given by midwives. In order to achieve good results in a health programme applied to a newly imported or emerging infectious disease, it is important that health professionals are adequately trained and are made aware of the specific health needs of the group in question.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors acknowledge the midwives of the Valencian Community for their involvement in the incorporation of serological screening for Chagas disease into the prenatal care programme provided to pregnant women. This study was funded partly by a grant (AP090/11) provided by the Generalitat Valenciana (Spain).

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Schmunis, GA. Epidemiology of Chagas disease in non-endemic countries: the role of international migration. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2007; 102 (Suppl. 1): 7585.Google Scholar
2. WHO. Control of Chagas disease. Second report of the WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report 905. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.Google Scholar
3. Spanish National Institute of Statistics. Vital statistics register, 2010. (http//www.ine.es/inebase/). Accessed 9 December 2010.Google Scholar
4. Ramos, JM, et al. Prenatal screening for Trypanosoma cruzi and human T lymphotropic virus types 1 and 2 in pregnant Latin American. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 2009; 27: 165167.Google Scholar
5. Giménez-Martí, MJ, et al. Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in immigrant population in the city of Valencia [in Spanish]. Enfermedades Emergentes 2006; 3: 7478.Google Scholar
6. Gil-Brusola, A, et al. Prevalence of Chagas disease among pregnant women and immigrant population from Latin America. A comparative study [in Spanish]. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 2007; 25: 8889.Google Scholar
7. Paricio-Talayero, JM, et al. Epidemiological surveillance of vertically-transmitted Chagas disease at three maternity hospitals in the Valencian community. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica 2008; 26: 609613.Google Scholar
8. Muñoz, J, et al. Prevalence and vertical transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection among pregnant Latin American women attending 2 maternity clinics in Barcelona, Spain. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009; 48: 17361740.Google Scholar
9. Orti-Lucas, R, Parada-Barba, C. Prevalence of American trypanosomiasis in pregnant women from a health area of Valencia, Spain, 2005–2007. Revista Española de Salud Pública 2009; 83: 543555.Google Scholar
10. Riera, C, et al. Congenital tansmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in Europe (Spain): a case report. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2006; 75: 10781081.Google Scholar
11. Muñoz, J, et al. Congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection in a non-endemic area. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2007; 101: 11611162.Google Scholar
12. Flores-Chavez, M, et al. Fatal congenital Chagas disease in a non-endemic area: a case report. Cases Journal 2008; 1: 302.Google Scholar
13. Azogue, E. Congenital Chagas disease treatment with nifurtimox and benznidazol. An experience in Santa Cruz, Bolivia [in Spanish]. Revista del Instituto Medico Sucre 1999; 115: 3943.Google Scholar
14. Moretti, EBB, et al. Chagas' disease: study of congenital transmisión in cases of acute maternal infection. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 2005; 38: 5355.Google Scholar
15. Rodrigues Coura, J, de Castro, SRL. A critical review on Chagas disease chemotherapy. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2002; 97: 3–24.Google Scholar
16. Generalitat Valenciana. Imported Chagas disease. Protocol of actions in the Valencian Community [in Spanish]. Valencia: Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria de Sanitat, 2009, pp. 65.Google Scholar
17. Generalitat Valenciana. Pregnancy monitoring guide for professionals [in Spanish]. Valencia: Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria de Sanitat, 2002, pp. 72.Google Scholar
18. Generalitat Valenciana. Prevention of congenital and perinatal infections in the Valencian Community [in Spanish]. Valencia: Generalitat Valenciana, Conselleria de Sanitat, 2007, pp 57.Google Scholar
19. WHO. Chagas disease report [in Spanish]. Buenos Aires: World Health Organization, 2007, pp. 104.Google Scholar
20. Yadon, Z, Schmunis, G. Congenital Chagas disease: estimating the potential risk in the United States. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2009; 81: 927933.Google Scholar
21. Schmunis, GA, Yadon, ZE. Chagas disease: a Latin American health problem becoming a world health problem. Acta Tropica 2010; 115: 1421.Google Scholar
22. Jackson, Y, Holst, M, Mauris, A. Chagas disease in Latin-American adult immigrants living in Geneva, Switzerland: prevalence, clinical description and risk for bloodborne transmission. Tropical Medicine & International Health 2009; 14 (Suppl. 2): 237.Google Scholar
23. Parada, C, et al. Prevalence of Chagas disease among pregnant women and blood donors in Valencia [in Spanish]. Enfermedades Emergentes 2008; 10 (Suppl. 1): 4748.Google Scholar
24. Soriano Arandes, A, et al. Prevalence of Chagas disease in the Latin American immigrant population in a primary health centre in Barcelona (Spain). Acta Tropica 2009; 112: 228230.Google Scholar
25. Azogue, E, La Fuente, C, Darras, C. Congenital Chagas' disease in Bolivia: epidemiological aspects and pathological findings. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1985; 79: 176180.Google Scholar
26. Torrico, F, et al. Maternal Trypanosoma cruzi infection, pregnancy outcome, morbidity and mortality of congenitally infected an non-infected newborns in Bolivia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2004; 70: 201209.Google Scholar
27. Torrico, F, et al. Endemic level of congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection in the areas of maternal residence and the development of congenital Chagas disease in Bolivia. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical 2005; 38 (Suppl. 2): 1720.Google Scholar
28. González-Granado, LI, Rojo Cornejo, P, González-Tomé, MI. Systematic screening for Chagas disease in pregnant Bolivian women and monitoring of newborns. A one year experience [in Spanish]. Enfermedades Emergentes 2009; 11 (Suppl. 1): 1819.Google Scholar
29. Bern, C, Martin, DL, Gilman, RH. Acute and congenital Chagas disease. Advances in Parasitology 2011; 75: 1947.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Diagnostic algorithm of Chagas disease in pregnant Latin American women.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Diagnostic algorithm of Chagas disease in newborns.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Geographical origin of immigrant mothers in the city of Valencia, Spain (2009–2010).

Figure 3

Table 1. Prevalence of T. cruzi infection in pregnant Latin American women resident in the city of Valencia by geographical area and country of origin (2009–2010)

Figure 4

Table 2. Diagnostic methods of congenital Chagas cases