Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Reduced spillover transmission of Mycobacterium bovis to feral pigs (Sus scofa) following population control of brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula)

  • G. NUGENT (a1), J. WHITFORD (a1), I. J. YOCKNEY (a1) and M. L. CROSS (a1)
Summary
SUMMARY

In New Zealand, bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is present in domestic cattle and deer herds primarily as the result of on-going disease transmission from the primary wildlife host, the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). However, bTB is also present in other introduced free-ranging mammalian species. Between 1996 and 2007, we conducted a series of studies to determine whether poison control of possum populations would have any effect on the prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in sympatric feral pigs (Sus scrofa). We compared trends in the prevalence of bTB infection in feral pigs in six study areas: possum numbers were reduced in three areas, but not in the other three, effectively providing a thrice-replicated before-after-control-intervention design. Before possum control, the overall prevalence of culture-confirmed M. bovis infection in feral pigs was 16·7–94·4%, depending on area. Infection prevalence varied little between genders but did vary with age, increasing during the first 2–3 years of life but then declining in older pigs. In the areas in which possum control was applied, M. bovis prevalence in feral pigs fell to near zero within 2–3 years, provided control was applied successfully at the whole-landscape scale. In contrast, prevalence changed much less or not at all in the areas with no possum control. We conclude that feral pigs in New Zealand acquire M. bovis infection mainly by inter-species transmission from possums, but then rarely pass the disease on to other pigs and are end hosts. This is in contrast to the purported role of pigs as bTB maintenance hosts in other countries, and we suggest the difference in host status may reflect differences in the relative importance of the oral route of infection in different environments. Despite harbouring M. bovis infection for a number of years, pigs in New Zealand do not sustain bTB independently, but are good sentinels for disease prevalence in possum populations.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence: Dr G. Nugent, Landcare Research – Manaaki Whenua, PO Box 40, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand. (Email: nugentg@landcareresearch.co.nz)
References
Hide All
1.Anon. Animal Health Board Annual Report 2010. Animal Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.
2.Coleman JD, Cook MM. Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife in New Zealand. Tuberculosis 2001; 81: 191202.
3.Efford M. Possum density, population structure, and dynamics. In: Montague TL, ed. The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact, and Management of an Introduced Marsupial. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press, 2000, pp. 4761.
4.Anon. New research estimates there are about 30 million possums in New Zealand. Landcare Research online press release, 9 December 2009. (http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/news/release.asp?Ne_ID=284).
5.Coleman JD, et al. Prevalence and spatial distribution of bovine tuberculosis in brushtail possums on a forest-scrub margin. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 1994; 42: 128132.
6.Nugent G. The of wild deer in the epidemiology and management of bovine tuberculosis in New Zealand. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand, 2005.
7.Corner LA. The role of wild animal populations in the epidemiology of tuberculosis in domestic animals: how to assess the risk. Veterinary Microbiology 2006; 112: 303312.
8.Lugton IW.The contribution of wild mammals to the epidemiology of tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in New Zealand. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 1997.
9.Wakelin CA, Churchman OT. Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in feral pigs in Central Otago. Surveillance 1991; 18: 1920.
10.Morris RS, Pfeiffer DU. Directions and issues in bovine tuberculosis epidemiology and control in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 1995; 43: 256265.
11.McInerney J, Small KJ, Caley P. Prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in feral pigs in the Northern Territory. Australian Veterinary Journal 1995; 72: 448451.
12.Radunz B. Surveillance and risk management during the latter stages of eradication: experiences from Australia. Veterinary Microbiology 2006; 112: 283290.
13.Coleman JD, Caley P. Possums as reservoirs of bovine Tb. In: Montague TL, ed. The Brushtail Possum: Biology, Impact, and Management of an Introduced Marsupial. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press, 2000, pp. 92–104.
14.Machackova M, et al. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) as a possible vector of mycobacterial infections: review of literature and critical analysis of data from Central Europe between 1983 to 2001. Veterinarni Medicina 2003; 48: 5165.
15.Serraino A, et al. Monitoring of transmission of tuberculosis between wild boars and cattle: genotypical analysis of strains by molecular epidemiology techniques. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1999; 37: 27662771.
16.Parra A, et al. Epidemiology of mycobacterium bovis infections of pigs and wild boars, using a molecular approach. Veterinary Microbiology 2003; 97: 123133.
17.Vicente J, et al. Wild boar and red deer display high prevalences of tuberculosis-like lesions in Spain. Veterinary Research 2006; 37: 107119.
18.Vicente J, et al. Risk factors associated with the prevalence of tuberculosis-like lesions in fenced wild boar and red deer in south central Spain. Veterinary Research 2007; 38: 451–64.
19.Richomme C, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in livestock and wild boar on the Mediterranean island, Corsica. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2010; 46: 627–31.
20.Anon. A protocol for possum population monitoring using the trap-catch method. National Possum Control Agencies (NPCA) online publication (http://www.npca.org.nz/images/stories/NPCA/PDF/a1_monittrapc_2010_10.pdf).
21.Coleman J, Fraser W. Bovine Tb persistence in low-density possum populations – the patchiness problem. Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Vertebrate Pest Conference. MAF Publication, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 17.
22.Ramsey D, et al. The evaluation of indices of animal abundance using spatial simulation of animal trapping. Wildlife Research 2005; 32: 229237.
23.Coleman JD, Coleman MC, Warburton B. Trends in the incidence of tuberculosis in possums and livestock associated with differing control intensities applied to possum populations. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 2006; 54: 5260.
24.Pfeiffer DU, et al. The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infection in brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in the Hauhungaroa ranges, New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 1995; 43: 272–80.
25.Nugent G. Optimal buffer widths for control of possums and Tb in wild animals and cattle in the Hauhangaroa range. In: Seminar Proceedings on Possum and Mustelid Control Research. National Possum Control Agencies (NPCA) publication, Wellington, New Zealand, 1997, pp. 123125.
26.Coleman JD, Fraser KW, Nugent G. Costs and benefits of pre-feeding for possum control. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 2007; 34: 185193.
27.Clarke CMH, et al. A comparison of tooth eruption and wear and dental cementum techniques in age determination of New Zealand feral pigs. Wildlife Research 1992; 19: 7697.
28.Collet D. Modeling Binary Data. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
29.de Lisle GW, Yates GF, Coleman JD. Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis from brushtail possums with non-visible lesions. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 2009; 57: 221–4.
30.Cooke MM, et al. Tuberculosis in wild and feral animals in New Zealand. Infectious Diseases Review 1999; 1: 241247.
31.Nugent G, Whitford J, Young N. Use of released pigs as sentinels for Mycobacterium bovis. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2002; 38: 665677.
32.Corner LA, Norton S. Resolution of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wild brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). New Zealand Veterinary Journal 2003; 51: 4042.
33.Francis J. Tuberculosis in Animals and Man. A Study in Comparative Pathology. London: Cassell, 1958.
34.Corner LA, et al. A survey of mycobacteriosis of feral pigs in the northern territory. Australian Veterinary Journal 1981; 57: 537542.
35.Gortázar C, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in Doñana Biosphere Reserve: the role of wild ungulates as disease reservoirs in the last Iberian lynx strongholds. PLoS One 2008; 3: e2776.
36.Hermoso de Mendoza J, et al. Bovine tuberculosis in wild boar (Sus scrofa), red deer (Cervus elaphus) and cattle (Bos taurus) in a Mediterranean ecosystem (1992–2004). Preventative Veterinary Medicine 2006; 74: 239–47.
37.Gortazar C, Vicente J, Gavier-Widén D. Pathology of bovine tuberculosis in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). Veterinary Record 2003; 152: 779780.
38.Miller R, et al. Evaluation of the influence of supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in the Michigan wild deer population. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2003; 39: 8495.
39.Nugent G, Yockney IJ, Whitford EJ. Intraspecific transmission of Mycobacterium bovis among penned feral pigs in New Zealand. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2011; 47: 364372.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 16 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 94 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.