Skip to main content
×
Home

The use of clinical profiles in the investigation of foodborne outbreaks in restaurants: United States, 1982–1997

  • C. W. HEDBERG (a1), K. L. PALAZZI-CHURAS (a1), V. J. RADKE (a2), C. A. SELMAN (a2) and R. V. TAUXE (a3)...
Summary
SUMMARY

Improving the efficiency of outbreak investigation in restaurants is critical to reducing outbreak-associated illness and improving prevention strategies. Because clinical characteristics of outbreaks are usually available before results of laboratory testing, we examined their use for determining contributing factors in outbreaks caused by restaurants. All confirmed foodborne outbreaks reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from 1982 to 1997 were reviewed. Clinical profiles were developed based on outbreak characteristics. We compared the percentage of contributing factors by known agent and clinical profile to their occurrence in outbreaks of unclassified aetiology. In total, 2246 foodborne outbreaks were included: 697 (31%) with known aetiology and 1549 (69%) with aetiology undetermined. Salmonella accounted for 65% of outbreaks with a known aetiology. Norovirus-like clinical profiles were noted in 54% of outbreaks with undetermined aetiology. Improper holding times and temperatures were associated with outbreaks caused by Clostridium perfringens, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella, and also with outbreaks of undetermined aetiology that fitted diarrhoea-toxin and vomiting-toxin clinical profiles. Poor personal hygiene was associated with norovirus, Shigella, and Salmonella, and also with outbreaks that fitted norovirus-like and vomiting-toxin clinical profiles. Contributing factors were similar for outbreaks with known aetiology and for those where aetiology was assigned by corresponding clinical profile. Rapidly categorizing outbreaks by clinical profile, before results of laboratory testing are available, can help identification of factors which contributed to the occurrence of the outbreak and will promote timely and efficient outbreak investigations.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence: C. W. Hedberg, Ph.D., Division of Environmental Health Sciences, MMC 807, 420 Delaware Street, S.E. Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. (Email: hedbe005@umn.edu)
References
Hide All
1. Olson SJ, et al. Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks – United States, 1993–1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2000; 49 (Suppl. 1): 162.
2. Hall JA, et al. Epidemiologic profiling: evaluating foodborne outbreaks for which no pathogen was isolated by routine laboratory testing: United States, 1982–1989. Epidemiology and Infection 2001; 127: 381387.
3. Deneen VC, et al. The impact of foodborne calicivirus disease: The Minnesota Experience. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2000; 181 (Suppl. 2): S281283.
4. Fankhauser RL, et al. Molecular epidemiology of ‘Norwalk-like viruses’ in outbreaks of gastroenteritis in the United States. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1998; 178: 15711578.
5. Dalton CB, et al. Outbreaks of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in American adults: a clinical and epidemiologic profile. Epidemiology and Infection 1999; 123: 916.
6. Naimi TS, et al. Concurrent outbreaks of Shigella sonnei and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infections associated with parsley: implications for surveillance and outbreak control. Journal of Food Protection 2003; 66: 535541.
7. Beatty ME, et al. Enterotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O169:H41, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004; 10: 518521.
8. O'Brien SJ, et al. Surveillance of foodborne outbreaks of infectious intestinal disease in England and Walesm 1992–1999: contributing to the evidence-based food policy? Public Health 2002; 116: 7580.
9. Rossi PG, Faustini A, Perucci CA. Regional Foodborne Disease Surveillance Group. Validation of guidelines for investigating foodborne disease outbreaks: the experience of the Lazio region, Italy. Journal of Food Protection 2003; 66: 23432348.
10. Turcios RM, et al. Reevaluation of epidemiological criteria for identifying outbreaks of acute gastroenteritis due to norovirus: United States, 1998–2000. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2006; 42: 964969.
11. Food and Drug Administration Retail Food Program Steering Committee. Report of the FDA retail food program database of foodborne illness risk factors. US Food and Drug Adminsitration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. Washington, DC, 2000 (http//www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/retrsk.html). Accessed 15 February 2007.
12. Hedberg CW, et al. (the EHS-Net Working Group). Systematic environmental evaluations to identify food safety differences between outbreak and nonoutbreak restaurants. Journal of Food Protection 2006; 69: 26972702.
13. Bryan FL, Guzewich JJ, Todd ECD. Surveillance of foodborne disease III. Summary and presentation of data on vehicles and contributory factors; their value and limitations. Journal of Food Protection 1997; 60: 701714.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 14 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 85 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.