Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Patient's experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: A review of qualitative studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2011


Christina Katsakou
Affiliation:
Unit for Social & Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, London (United Kingdom)
Stefan Priebe
Affiliation:
Unit for Social & Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, London (United Kingdom)
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Summary

Aims - This study aimed to explore psychiatric patients' experiences of involuntary admission and treatment by reviewing qualitative studies. Method - Qualitative studies investigating patients' experiences of involuntary treatment were identified. Relevant databases were searched and authors were contacted. Thematic analysis was applied for the synthesis of emerging issues. Results - Five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The main areas that appear to be of importance are: patients' perceived autonomy and participation in decisions for themselves, their feeling of whether or not they are being cared for and their sense of identity. In these areas both negative and positive consequences from involuntary admission were mentioned. However, methodological weaknesses were also found, such as small sample sizes. Furthermore, it is not described whether these themes are mentioned by all participants as negative and positive aspects of their experience or whether they reflect views supported by distinct groups. Conclusions - Although the perceived impact of involuntary treatment is fairly clearly described, differences between distinct patient groups are not examined. Future research should investigate such differences in order to inform relevant policy decisions for particular groups.

Declaration of Interest: None.


Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Barbour, R. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal 322, 11151117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, M., Davis, A., Tew, J., Gell, C.Glynn, T., Lewis, L., Pryce, J. & Saddal, S. (2000). Users experiences of compulsion under the 1983 Mental Health Act. University of Birmingham (unpublished report).Google Scholar
Bennett, N.S., Lidz, C.W., Monahan, J., Mulvey, E., Hoge, S.K., Roth, L.H. & Gardner, W. (1993). Inclusion, motivation and good faith: the morality of coercion in mental hospital admission. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 11, 295306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromley, H., Dockery, G., Fenton, C., Nhelma, B., Smith, H., Tolhurst, R. & Theobald, S. (2002). Criteria for evaluating qualitative studies. Retrieved November 16, 2006, from http://www.liv.ac.uk/lstm/download/guidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
Canvin, K., Bartlett, A. & Pinfold, V. (2005). Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on supervised discharge and guardianship. Journal of Medical Ethics 31, 457462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, J.P. (2003). How to peer review a qualitative manuscript. In Peer Review in Health Sciences. Second edition, (ed. Jefferson, G. F. and London, T.), pp. 219235. BMJ Books: London.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. (2000). The Quorom statement. Lancet 355 (9205), 756757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon- Woods, M. & Fitzpatrick, R. (2001). Qualitative research in systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 323, 765766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon- Woods, M., Shaw, R.L., Agarwal, S. & Smith, J.A. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care 13, 223225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, M., Davis, A., Tew, J., Gell, C.Glynn, T., Lewis, L., Pryce, J. & Saddal, S. (2000). Users' Experiences of Compulsion Under the 1983 Mental Health Act. University of Birmingham (unpublished report).Google Scholar
Johansson, I.M. & Lundman, B. (2002). Patients' experiences of involuntary psychiatric care: good opportunities and great losses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 9, 639647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, S.L. & Mason, T. (2002). Quality of treatment following police detention of mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 9, 7380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katsakou, C. & Priebe, S. (2006). Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission- a review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 114 (4), 232241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J. & Westmorland, M. (1998). Guidelines for Critical Review Form- Qualitative Studies. Retrieved November 16, 2006, from http://www.usc.edu/hsc/ebnet/res/Guidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust. (2002). Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). 10 Questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Retrieved November 16, 2006, from http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/casp.htmGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, B. & Jacobsson, L. (2001). A plea for respect: involuntary hospitalized psychiatric patients' narratives about being subjected to coercion. Journal of Psychiatric and mental Health Nursing 8, 357366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olofsson, B. & Norberg, A. (2001). Experiences of coercion in psychiatric care as narrated by patients, nurses and physicians. Journal of Advanced Nursing 33 (1), 8997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, M.A.O., Furegato, A.R.F & Pereira, A. (2005). The lived experience of long term psychiatric hospitalization of four women in Brazil. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 41 (3), 124132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, A., Lelliott, P., Audini, B. & Buston, K. (2000). Module C Performing the Act: A Qualitative Study of the Process of Mental Health Act Assessments. Final Report to the Department of Health, London, (unpublished report)Google Scholar
Quirk, A., Lelliott, P., Audini, B. & Buston, K. (2003). Non-clinical and extra-legal influences on decisions about compulsory admission to psychiatric hospital. Journal of Mental Health 12 (2), 119130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seale, C. (2002). Quality issues in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work 1, 97110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, J. & Priebe, S. (2002). A phenomenological account of users' experiences of assertive community treatment. Bioethics 16 (5), 439454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 368 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 2nd December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-79f79cbf67-8q5vc Total loading time: 0.379 Render date: 2020-12-02T10:16:39.196Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Wed Dec 02 2020 10:06:47 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Patient's experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: A review of qualitative studies
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Patient's experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: A review of qualitative studies
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Patient's experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: A review of qualitative studies
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *