Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric perspectives on maternal cradling preferences

  • Jechil S. Sieratzki (a1) and Bencie Woll (a2)

Objective – To assess competing explanations for the universal preference of mothers to cradle infants on their left side and to propose a relation to hemispheric asymmetry for social attachment and communication behaviour. Methods – A review of observational, experimental, physiological, psychological, neuro-physiological, and neuro-psychological studies, including new findings on the cradling behaviour of mothers with auditory or visual impairments. Results – A significant left-cradling bias is observed in both right- and left-handed mothers which cannot adequately be explained by arguments based on handedness or closer contact to the soothing sound of the maternal heartbeat. Observations of primate behaviour have led to the suggestion that the left-cradling bias may be related to a left visual field (right hemisphere) advantage for monitoring an infant's facial expressions of distress. However, more than just monitoring, cradling subserves the mother's connection with the infant. For that reason, we have suggested that left cradling might be related to a right hemisphere specialisation for emotional communication, i.e. the speech melody, smiles, signals, and stroking which mothers use to interact with their infants. Studies of mother-infant interaction show that the sound of the mother's voice is more soothing when cradling on the left, more stimulating when cradling on the right. Cradling laterality may thus be related to emotional state and behavioural intent. There is also evidence to suggest that left cradling is linked to a special role of the right hemisphere in social attachment behaviour. This function may be disturbed in mothers with postnatal depression who show abnormal right hemisphere activity. Conclusion – Cradling embodies the symbiotic relationship between mother and infant; various lines of evidence support the suggestion that the universal preference of mothers to cradle infants on their left side is related to a right hemisphere dominance for social attachment and communication behaviour.

Corresponding author
Indirizzo per la corrispondenza: Professor B. Woll, Department of Language and Communication Science, City University, Northampton Square, London EC 1V 0HB (UK). E-mail:;
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C.T. Best , J.S. Womer & H.F. Queen (1994). Hemispheric asymmetries in adults' perception of infant emotional expressions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance 20, 751765.

B.A. Bettes (1988). Maternal depression and motherese: Temporal and international features. Child Development 59, 10891096.

L.Y. Bogren (1984). Side preference in women and men when holding their new-born child: psychological background. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 69, 1323.

J.C. Borod , C.S. Haywood & E. Koff (1997). Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: a review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsychological Review 7, 4160.

Z. Breznitz & T. Sherman (1987). Speech patterning of natural discourse of well and depressed mothers and their young children. Child Development 58, 395400.

R.S. Bundy (1979). Effect of infant head position on side preference in adult handling. Infant Behaviour & Development 2, 355358.

R.J. Davidson , H. Abercrombie , J.B. Nitschke & K. Putnam (1999). Regional brain function, emotion and disorders of emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9, 228234.

G. Dawson , K. Frey , J. Self , H. Panagiotides , D. Hessl , E. Yamada & J. Rinaldi (1999). Frontal brain electrical activity in infants of depressed and non-depressed mothers: relation to variations in infant behavior. Development and Psychopathology 11, 589605.

A.J. DeCasper & M.J. Spence (1986). Prenatal maternal speech influences newborns' perception of speech sounds. Infant Behavior & Development 9, 133150.

P. De Chateau (1987). Left-side preference in holding and carrying new-born infants. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 75, 283286.

P. De Chateau & Y. Andersson (1976). Left sided preference for holding and carrying newborn infants II: Doll-holding and carrying from 2 to 16 years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 18, 738744.

S. Fernandez-Carriba , A. Loeches , A. Morcillo & W.D. Hopkins (2002). Asymmetry in facial expression of emotions by chimpanzees. Neuropsychologia 40, 15231533.

M.D. Hauser (1993). Right hemisphere dominance for the production of facial expression in monkeys. Science 261, 475477.

N.A. Jones , T. Field & M. Davalos (2000). Right frontal EEG asymmetry and lack of empathy in preschool children of depressed mothers. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 30, 189204.

P.S. Kaplan , J.A. Bachorowski & P. Zarlengo-Stauss (1999). Childdirected speech produced by mothers with symptoms of depression fails to promote associative learning in 4-months-old infants. Child Development 70, 560570.

M. Liotti & H. S. Mayberg (2001). The role of functional neuroimaging in the neuropsychology of depression. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 23, 121–36.

J. P. Lorberbaum , J. D. Newman , A. R. Horwitz , J. R. Dubno , R. B. Lydiard , M. B. Hamner , D. E. Bohning & M. S. George (2002). A potential role for thalamocingulate circuitry in human maternal behaviour. Biological Psychiatry 51, 431445.

M.D. Lucas , O.H. Turabull & Solms K.L. Kaplan (1993). Laterality of cradling in relation to perception and expression of facial affect. Journal of Genetic Psychology 154, 347352.

J.T. Manning & A.T. Chamberlain (1990). The left side cradling preference in great apes. Animal Behaviour 39, 12241227.

J.T. Manning & A.T. Chamberlain (1991). Left-side cradling and brain lateralisation. Ethology and Sociobiology 12, 237244.

H. Palmqvist (1975). The effect of heartbeat sound stimulation on the weight development of new-born infants. Child Development 46, 292295.

M. Pelaez-Nogueras , T.M. Field , Z. Hossain & J. Pickens (1996). Depressed mother's touching increases infants' positive affect and attention in still-face interactions. Child Development 67, 17801792.

N. Reissland (2000). The cradling bias in relation to pitch of maternal child-directed language. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 18, 179186.

L. Salk (1973). The role of the heartbeat in relations between mother and infant. Scientific American 228, 2429.

J. S. Sieratzki & B. Woll (1996). Why do mothers cradle babies to the left ? Lancet 347, 17461748.

B. Todd & G. Butterworth (1998). Her heart is in the right place: An investigation of the «heartbeat hypothesis» as an explanation of the left side cradling preference in a mother with dextrocardia. Early Development & Parenting 7, 229233.

O.H. Turnbull & M.D. Lucas (1996). Is the left cradling preference related to lateral asymmetries in attention? Journal of Genetic Psychology 157, 161167.

O.H. Turnbull , S.L. Rhys-Jones & A.L. Jackson (2001). The leftward cradling bias and prosody: an investigation of cradling preferences in the Deaf community. Journal of Genetic Psychology 162, 178186.

J.H. Weiland & Z. Sperber (1970). Patterns of mother-infant contact: The significance of lateral preference. Journal of Genetic Psychology 117, 157165.

B. Woll & J.S. Sieratzki (2002). Leftward cradling bias, prosodic speech, and deafness: The Deaf are not dumb. Journal of Genetic Psychology 163, 126128.

C. Yoshinaga-Itano (1999). Benefits of early intervention for children with hearing loss. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 32, 10891102.

D. W. Zaidel (1996). Left-sided cradling. Lancet 348, 691.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • ISSN: 2045-7960
  • EISSN: 2045-7979
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-psychiatric-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 79 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.