Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Patient's experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: A review of qualitative studies

  • Christina Katsakou (a1) and Stefan Priebe (a1)
Summary

Aims - This study aimed to explore psychiatric patients' experiences of involuntary admission and treatment by reviewing qualitative studies. Method - Qualitative studies investigating patients' experiences of involuntary treatment were identified. Relevant databases were searched and authors were contacted. Thematic analysis was applied for the synthesis of emerging issues. Results - Five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The main areas that appear to be of importance are: patients' perceived autonomy and participation in decisions for themselves, their feeling of whether or not they are being cared for and their sense of identity. In these areas both negative and positive consequences from involuntary admission were mentioned. However, methodological weaknesses were also found, such as small sample sizes. Furthermore, it is not described whether these themes are mentioned by all participants as negative and positive aspects of their experience or whether they reflect views supported by distinct groups. Conclusions - Although the perceived impact of involuntary treatment is fairly clearly described, differences between distinct patient groups are not examined. Future research should investigate such differences in order to inform relevant policy decisions for particular groups.

Declaration of Interest: None.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Professor S. Priebe, Academic Unit, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London E13 8SP (United Kingdom). Fax: 0 (+44) 20 7540 2976 E-mail: s.priebe@qmul.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Barbour, R. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal 322, 11151117.
Barnes, M., Davis, A., Tew, J., Gell, C.Glynn, T., Lewis, L., Pryce, J. & Saddal, S. (2000). Users experiences of compulsion under the 1983 Mental Health Act. University of Birmingham (unpublished report).
Bennett, N.S., Lidz, C.W., Monahan, J., Mulvey, E., Hoge, S.K., Roth, L.H. & Gardner, W. (1993). Inclusion, motivation and good faith: the morality of coercion in mental hospital admission. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 11, 295306.
Bromley, H., Dockery, G., Fenton, C., Nhelma, B., Smith, H., Tolhurst, R. & Theobald, S. (2002). Criteria for evaluating qualitative studies. Retrieved November 16, 2006, from http://www.liv.ac.uk/lstm/download/guidelines.pdf
Canvin, K., Bartlett, A. & Pinfold, V. (2005). Acceptability of compulsory powers in the community: the ethical considerations of mental health service users on supervised discharge and guardianship. Journal of Medical Ethics 31, 457462.
Clark, J.P. (2003). How to peer review a qualitative manuscript. In Peer Review in Health Sciences. Second edition, (ed. Jefferson, G. F. and London, T.), pp. 219235. BMJ Books: London.
Clarke, M. (2000). The Quorom statement. Lancet 355 (9205), 756757.
Dixon- Woods, M. & Fitzpatrick, R. (2001). Qualitative research in systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 323, 765766.
Dixon- Woods, M., Shaw, R.L., Agarwal, S. & Smith, J.A. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care 13, 223225.
Barnes, M., Davis, A., Tew, J., Gell, C.Glynn, T., Lewis, L., Pryce, J. & Saddal, S. (2000). Users' Experiences of Compulsion Under the 1983 Mental Health Act. University of Birmingham (unpublished report).
Johansson, I.M. & Lundman, B. (2002). Patients' experiences of involuntary psychiatric care: good opportunities and great losses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 9, 639647.
Jones, S.L. & Mason, T. (2002). Quality of treatment following police detention of mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 9, 7380.
Katsakou, C. & Priebe, S. (2006). Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission- a review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 114 (4), 232241.
Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J. & Westmorland, M. (1998). Guidelines for Critical Review Form- Qualitative Studies. Retrieved November 16, 2006, from http://www.usc.edu/hsc/ebnet/res/Guidelines.pdf
Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust. (2002). Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). 10 Questions to help you make sense of qualitative research. Retrieved November 16, 2006, from http://www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/casp.htm
Olofsson, B. & Jacobsson, L. (2001). A plea for respect: involuntary hospitalized psychiatric patients' narratives about being subjected to coercion. Journal of Psychiatric and mental Health Nursing 8, 357366.
Olofsson, B. & Norberg, A. (2001). Experiences of coercion in psychiatric care as narrated by patients, nurses and physicians. Journal of Advanced Nursing 33 (1), 8997.
Pereira, M.A.O., Furegato, A.R.F & Pereira, A. (2005). The lived experience of long term psychiatric hospitalization of four women in Brazil. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 41 (3), 124132.
Quirk, A., Lelliott, P., Audini, B. & Buston, K. (2000). Module C Performing the Act: A Qualitative Study of the Process of Mental Health Act Assessments. Final Report to the Department of Health, London, (unpublished report)
Quirk, A., Lelliott, P., Audini, B. & Buston, K. (2003). Non-clinical and extra-legal influences on decisions about compulsory admission to psychiatric hospital. Journal of Mental Health 12 (2), 119130.
Seale, C. (2002). Quality issues in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work 1, 97110.
Watts, J. & Priebe, S. (2002). A phenomenological account of users' experiences of assertive community treatment. Bioethics 16 (5), 439454.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • ISSN: 2045-7960
  • EISSN: 2045-7979
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-psychiatric-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed