Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Consensual Decision-Making Among Epistemic Peers

  • Stephan Hartmann, Carlo Martini and Jan Sprenger
Abstract

This paper focuses on the question of how to resolve disagreement and uses the Lehrer-Wagner model as a formal tool for investigating consensual decision-making. The main result consists in a general definition of when agents treat each other as epistemic peers (Kelly 2005; Elga 2007), and a theorem vindicating the “equal weight view” to resolve disagreement among epistemic peers. We apply our findings to an analysis of the impact of social network structures on group deliberation processes, and we demonstrate their stability with the help of numerical simulations.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aumann, Robert. 1976. “Agreeing to Disagree.” Annals of Statistics 4: 1236–9.
Bradley, Richard. 2006. “Taking Advantage of Difference of Opinion.” Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3(3): 141–55.
Christensen, David. 2007. “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.” Philosophical Review 116: 187217.
DeGroot, Morris. 1974. “Reaching a Consensus.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 69: 118–21.
DeMarzo, Peter, Vayanos, Dimistri and Zwiebel, Jeffrey. 2003. “Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Unidimensional Opinions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(3): 909–68.
Elga, Adam. 2007. “Reflection and Disagreement.” Noûs 41: 478502.
Elga, Adam. 2009. “How to Disagree About How to Disagree.” In Feldman, R. and Warfield, T. (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feldman, Richard. 2007. “Reasonable Religious Disagreements.” In Antony, L. (eds.), Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life, pp. 194214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Golub, Benjamin and Jackson, Matthew O.. 2007. “Naïve Learning in Social Networks: Convergence, Influence, and the Wisdom of Crowds.” Working Papers Series FEEM Working Paper No. 64.2007.
Gutting, Gary. 1982. Religious Belief and Religious Skepticism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Hegselmann, Rainer and Krause, Ulrich. 2002. “Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence: Models, Analysis, and Simulation.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3).
Jackson, Matthew O. 2008. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kelly, Thomas. 2005. “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.” In Hawthorne, J. and Szabo, T. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology 1, pp. 167–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kelly, Thomas. 2009. “Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.” In Feldman, R. and Warfield, T. (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lehrer, Keith. 1976. “When Rational Disagreement is Impossible.” Noûs 10: 327–32.
Lehrer, Keith and Wagner, Carl. 1981. Rational Consensus in Science and Society. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Milgrom, Paul. 1981. “An Axiomatic Characterization of Common Knowledge.” Econometrica 49: 219–22.
Regan, Helen, Colyvan, Mark and Markovchick-Nicholls, Lisa. 2006. “A Formal Model for Consensus and Negotiation in Environmental Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 80: 167–76.
Steele, Katie, Regan, Helen, Colyvan, Mark and Burgman, Mark A.. 2007. “Right Decisions or Happy Decision-Makers?Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 21: 349–68.
Wagner, Carl. 1978. “Consensus Through Respect: A Model of Rational Group Decision-Making.” Philosophical Studies 34: 335–49.
Zollman, Kevin. 2007. “The Communication Structures of Epistemic Communities.” Philosophy of Science 74: 574–87.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Episteme
  • ISSN: 1742-3600
  • EISSN: 1750-0117
  • URL: /core/journals/episteme
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed